Clinic of Cardiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
Clinic of Cardiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Open Heart. 2024 Sep 30;11(2):e002899. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002899.
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a positive coronary CT angiography (CCTA).
We prospectively enrolled 104 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for symptoms of stable CAD and a CCTA indicative of obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performance of DSE was evaluated against two intracoronary pressure indices: (a) fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.80 and (b) instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.89, indicating haemodynamically significant stenoses.
Of 102 patients, 46 (45%) had at least one significant lesion as defined by FFR, as did 37 (36%) as defined by iFR. DSE showed positive results in 33% (34/102) of cases. The discriminative power of DSE for detecting significant CAD was moderate, with areas under the curve of 0.63 (p=0.024) compared with FFR and 0.64 (p=0.025) compared with iFR. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of DSE were, respectively, 61%, 43%, and 75% against FFR, and 64%, 46% and 74% against iFR. The diagnostic accuracy of DSE did not differ significantly between FFR and iFR as a reference (p=0.549).
In patients with positive CCTA, DSE has a moderate ability to identify haemodynamically significant CAD, with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. When assessed against FFR and iFR criteria, its additive diagnostic value is limited in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD.
NCT03045601.
评估在低至中度疑似阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)且冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)阳性的有症状患者中,多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)的诊断准确性。
我们前瞻性纳入了 104 例因稳定型 CAD 症状和提示阻塞性 CAD 的 CCTA 而行冠状动脉造影的连续患者。评估 DSE 的诊断性能,结果与两个冠状动脉内压力指数相对比:(a)以≤0.80 为截断值的血流储备分数(FFR),(b)以≤0.89 为截断值的瞬时无波比(iFR),提示存在有血流动力学意义的狭窄。
102 例患者中,46 例(45%)至少有一处 FFR 定义的显著病变,37 例(36%)至少有一处 iFR 定义的显著病变。DSE 检查结果阳性的患者有 33%(34/102)。DSE 对检测显著 CAD 的区分能力为中度,曲线下面积为 0.63(p=0.024),与 FFR 相比,与 iFR 相比为 0.64(p=0.025)。与 FFR 相比,DSE 的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为 61%、43%和 75%,与 iFR 相比分别为 64%、46%和 74%。DSE 的诊断准确性与 FFR 和 iFR 作为参考标准相比,没有显著差异(p=0.549)。
在 CCTA 阳性的患者中,DSE 识别有血流动力学意义的 CAD 的能力中等,敏感性低,特异性高。与 FFR 和 iFR 标准相比,在低至中度疑似阻塞性 CAD 的患者中,其附加诊断价值有限。
NCT03045601。