Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch Air Force Satellite, 2510 5th Street, Bldg 840, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States.
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):350-354. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference. Test-negative study designs are often utilized to calculate influenza vaccine effectiveness. The virus interference phenomenon goes against the basic assumption of the test-negative vaccine effectiveness study that vaccination does not change the risk of infection with other respiratory illness, thus potentially biasing vaccine effectiveness results in the positive direction. This study aimed to investigate virus interference by comparing respiratory virus status among Department of Defense personnel based on their influenza vaccination status. Furthermore, individual respiratory viruses and their association with influenza vaccination were examined.
We compared vaccination status of 2880 people with non-influenza respiratory viruses to 3240 people with pan-negative results. Comparing vaccinated to non-vaccinated patients, the adjusted odds ratio for non-flu viruses was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 1.09; p = 0.60). Additionally, the vaccination status of 3349 cases of influenza were compared to three different control groups: all controls (N = 6120), non-influenza positive controls (N = 2880), and pan-negative controls (N = 3240). The adjusted ORs for the comparisons among the three control groups did not vary much (range: 0.46-0.51).
Receipt of influenza vaccination was not associated with virus interference among our population. Examining virus interference by specific respiratory viruses showed mixed results. Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections.
接种流感疫苗可能会增加感染其他呼吸道病毒的风险,这种现象被称为病毒干扰。阴性测试研究设计常用于计算流感疫苗的有效性。病毒干扰现象违反了阴性测试疫苗有效性研究的基本假设,即疫苗不会改变感染其他呼吸道疾病的风险,因此可能会使疫苗有效性结果向阳性方向产生偏差。本研究旨在通过比较美国国防部人员的流感疫苗接种状况与呼吸道病毒状况,来研究病毒干扰。此外,还研究了个体呼吸道病毒及其与流感疫苗接种的关系。
我们将 2880 例非流感呼吸道病毒患者与 3240 例全阴性结果患者的疫苗接种情况进行了比较。与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种疫苗患者感染非流感病毒的调整比值比为 0.97(95%置信区间:0.86,1.09;p=0.60)。此外,我们还将 3349 例流感患者的疫苗接种情况与三组不同的对照组进行了比较:所有对照组(N=6120)、非流感阳性对照组(N=2880)和全阴性对照组(N=3240)。三组对照组之间的调整比值比差异不大(范围:0.46-0.51)。
在我们的人群中,流感疫苗接种与病毒干扰无关。通过特定的呼吸道病毒来检查病毒干扰,结果喜忧参半。疫苗衍生的病毒干扰与冠状病毒和人类偏肺病毒显著相关;然而,接种疫苗的显著保护作用不仅与大多数流感病毒有关,还与副流感病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒和非流感病毒的合并感染有关。