• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体患癌症及其他环境疾病的因果关系在法律和科学上的可能性。

Legal and scientific probability of causation of cancer and other environmental disease in individuals.

作者信息

Brennan T A, Carter R F

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Spring;10(1):33-80. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-1-33.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-10-1-33
PMID:3160761
Abstract

How to evaluate and apply probabilistic scientific evidence that cancer (or other diseases) have been caused by chemical substances (or other environmental agents) constitutes a critical problem which must be addressed by legal institutions. This article analyzes the basis of the current scientific concepts of causation and the means of incorporating epidemiological and statistical evidence of causation into the legal process, primarily with respect to cases of harm to individuals. Experiments with and adjustments of the legal system to effect an adequate accommodation of such probabilistic evidence are suggested.

摘要

如何评估和应用关于癌症(或其他疾病)由化学物质(或其他环境因素)所致的概率性科学证据,是法律机构必须解决的一个关键问题。本文主要针对个人受伤害案件,分析了当前因果关系科学概念的基础,以及将因果关系的流行病学和统计证据纳入法律程序的方法。文中还建议对法律制度进行试验和调整,以便充分接纳这类概率性证据。

相似文献

1
Legal and scientific probability of causation of cancer and other environmental disease in individuals.个体患癌症及其他环境疾病的因果关系在法律和科学上的可能性。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Spring;10(1):33-80. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-1-33.
2
[Occupational cancer. Legal medical considerations].[职业性癌症。法医学考量]
Beitr Krebsforsch. 1964;9:1-91.
3
Legal vs. medical criteria for determining causation in occupational disease claims.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;572:17-22; discussion 55-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb13566.x.
4
Medical causation analysis heuristics.
J Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jun;38(6):577-86. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199606000-00008.
5
Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.工作场所中的大麻:职业健康专业人员和雇主指南:美国职业健康护士协会与美国职业与环境医学学院联合指南声明
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Apr;63(4):139-64. doi: 10.1177/2165079915581983. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
Adjudicating cancer causation: scientific, political, and legal conflicts.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Jun;13(3):309-25. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90070-c.
7
Screening and monitoring data as evidence in legal proceedings.
J Occup Med. 1986 Oct;28(10):946-50. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198610000-00011.
8
Criteria for evidence of chemical carcinogenicity. Interdisciplinary Panel on Carcinogenicity.
Science. 1984 Aug 17;225(4663):682-7.
9
Science and persuasion: environmental disease in U.S. courts.科学与说服:美国法庭上的环境疾病
Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(10):1019-29. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90297-3.
10
U.S. Industries v. Director: "claim" versus "condition" in the analysis of workers' compensation cases.美国工业公司诉劳工赔偿局局长案:工伤赔偿案件分析中的“索赔”与“状况”
Am J Law Med. 1986;12(2):273-303.

引用本文的文献

1
Compensating lung cancer patients occupationally exposed to coal tar pitch volatiles.对职业性接触煤焦油沥青挥发物的肺癌患者进行补偿。
Occup Environ Med. 1996 Mar;53(3):160-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.3.160.
2
Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals.流行病学与法律:法庭与置信区间
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661.