• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流行病学与法律:法庭与置信区间

Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals.

作者信息

Christoffel T, Teret S P

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661
PMID:1746668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1405300/
Abstract

Beginning with the swine flu litigation of the early 1980s, epidemiological evidence has played an increasingly prominent role in helping the nation's courts deal with alleged causal connections between plaintiffs' diseases or other harm and exposure to specific noxious agents (such as asbestos, toxic waste, radiation, and pharmaceuticals). Judicial reliance on epidemiology has high-lighted the contrast between the nature of scientific proof and of legal proof. Epidemiologists need to recognize and understand the growing involvement of their profession in complex tort litigation.

摘要

从20世纪80年代初的猪流感诉讼开始,流行病学证据在帮助美国法院处理原告疾病或其他伤害与接触特定有害物质(如石棉、有毒废物、辐射和药品)之间所谓的因果关系方面发挥了越来越突出的作用。司法部门对流行病学的依赖凸显了科学证据与法律证据性质之间的差异。流行病学家需要认识并理解他们的专业在复杂侵权诉讼中日益增加的参与度。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals.流行病学与法律:法庭与置信区间
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661.
2
[Epidemiology and civil trials].[流行病学与民事审判]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1991 Aug;38(8):541-5.
3
Changing legal standards for proof of causation in hazardous waste tort cases. Plaintiffs' problems and congressional responses.危险废物侵权案件中因果关系证明法律标准的变化。原告面临的问题及国会的应对措施。
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1983 Dec;4(4):359-63. doi: 10.1097/00000433-198312000-00016.
4
Toxic tort litigation: medical and scientific principles in causation.有毒侵权诉讼:因果关系中的医学与科学原理
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1 Suppl):S69-78. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115792.
5
Causation and disease: biomedical science in toxic tort litigation.因果关系与疾病:有毒侵权诉讼中的生物医学科学
J Occup Med. 1989 Dec;31(12):997-1002. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198912000-00013.
6
Matching evidence about clustered health events with tort law requirements.将关于聚集性健康事件的证据与侵权法要求相匹配。
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1 Suppl):S79-86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115793.
7
Would a Federal Judicial Science Board improve toxic tort litigation?联邦司法科学委员会会改善有毒侵权诉讼吗?
Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(6):761-71. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170609.
8
Use and misuse of epidemiologic data in the courtroom: defining the limits of inferential and particularistic evidence in mass tort litigation.法庭上流行病学数据的使用与滥用:界定群体性侵权诉讼中推断性证据和特定性证据的界限
Am J Law Med. 1986;12(3-4):423-39.
9
Causation's nuclear future: applying proportional liability to the Price-Anderson Act.因果关系的核能未来:将比例责任应用于《普赖斯-安德森法案》。
Duke Law J. 2014 Nov;64(2):333-76.
10
The implementation of medical monitoring programs following potentially hazardous exposures: a medico-legal perspective.潜在危险暴露后医学监测计划的实施:法医学视角
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017 Nov;55(9):956-969. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1334913. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.改变枪支的宪法格局:美国最高法院最近的第二修正案裁决。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2021-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300200. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
2
Burden of proof: judging science and protecting public health in (and out of) the courtroom.举证责任:在法庭(及法庭之外)评判科学与保护公众健康
Am J Public Health. 1999 Apr;89(4):490-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.490.
3
Epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment: a bridge from science to policy.流行病学与定量风险评估:从科学到政策的桥梁。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Apr;85(4):484-91. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.4.484.

本文引用的文献

1
THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?环境与疾病:关联还是因果关系?
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58(5):295-300. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503.
2
Legal and scientific probability of causation of cancer and other environmental disease in individuals.个体患癌症及其他环境疾病的因果关系在法律和科学上的可能性。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Spring;10(1):33-80. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-1-33.
3
White swans, black ravens, and lame ducks: necessary and sufficient causes in epidemiology.白天鹅、黑乌鸦与跛脚鸭:流行病学中的必要病因和充分病因
Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):47-50. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00011.
4
DNA fingerprinting in the twilight zone.“模糊地带”的DNA指纹识别技术
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Mar-Apr;20(2):35-7.