Christoffel T, Teret S P
School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680.
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661.
Beginning with the swine flu litigation of the early 1980s, epidemiological evidence has played an increasingly prominent role in helping the nation's courts deal with alleged causal connections between plaintiffs' diseases or other harm and exposure to specific noxious agents (such as asbestos, toxic waste, radiation, and pharmaceuticals). Judicial reliance on epidemiology has high-lighted the contrast between the nature of scientific proof and of legal proof. Epidemiologists need to recognize and understand the growing involvement of their profession in complex tort litigation.
从20世纪80年代初的猪流感诉讼开始,流行病学证据在帮助美国法院处理原告疾病或其他伤害与接触特定有害物质(如石棉、有毒废物、辐射和药品)之间所谓的因果关系方面发挥了越来越突出的作用。司法部门对流行病学的依赖凸显了科学证据与法律证据性质之间的差异。流行病学家需要认识并理解他们的专业在复杂侵权诉讼中日益增加的参与度。