Farrier Adam James, Moore Lauren, Manning Will, Avila Carolina, Collins Simon N, Holland James
Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2019 Dec;233(12):1318-1326. doi: 10.1177/0954411919881520. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Hip resurfacing is an attractive alternative to total hip replacement preserving bone and reducing dislocation risk. Recent metal-on-metal designs have caused failure due to metal wear debris. Ceramic implants may mitigate this risk. Temperature increase in periprosthetic bone during cementation can lead to osteonecrosis, while deformation of the component can affect joint lubrication and may increase wear through clamping. Both processes may lead to implant loosening. This study quantifies the temperature and deformation change in a novel ceramic hip resurfacing femoral component compared to a metal standard during cemented implantation in a fresh frozen cadaveric model. Study design and methods Eight femora were prepared from four fresh frozen cadavers. One surgeon experienced in hip resurfacing surgery (J.H.) prepared the femora by reaming. Four ceramic and four metal implants of equal and varying size were cemented in place. Bone and surface temperatures were taken using a probe in the periprosthetic bone and an infrared laser thermometer, respectively. Deformation was measured using a micrometre. Measurements were taken before implantation and every 5-min intervals up to 30 min. The average bone-temperature increment was lower for ceramic heads than for metal heads. Although this difference was not statistically significant, the average bone temperature incremental change in small sizes (42 and 46 mm) was higher than in the large sizes (48 and 50 mm). Most metal heads sustained bearing diameter change that was still near its peak value 30 min after implantation, whereas the ceramic heads suffered a lower diameter change and most of the samples recovered their original diameter 30 min after implantation. Both implants behave similarly, however, a lower temperature rise in bone was observed with ceramic heads. This may lower the risk for thermal damage on periprosthetic bone. The ceramic heads deformed less during surgical implantation. This was not significant.
髋关节表面置换术是全髋关节置换术的一种有吸引力的替代方法,它能保留骨质并降低脱位风险。近期的金属对金属设计因金属磨损碎屑而导致失败。陶瓷植入物可能会降低这种风险。骨水泥固定过程中假体周围骨的温度升高会导致骨坏死,而部件的变形会影响关节润滑,并可能通过夹紧增加磨损。这两个过程都可能导致植入物松动。本研究在新鲜冷冻尸体模型中,对一种新型陶瓷髋关节表面置换股骨部件与金属标准部件在骨水泥植入过程中的温度和变形变化进行了量化。研究设计与方法:从四具新鲜冷冻尸体上制备了八个股骨。一位有髋关节表面置换手术经验的外科医生(J.H.)通过扩孔来制备股骨。将四个尺寸相等且不同的陶瓷植入物和四个金属植入物用骨水泥固定到位。分别使用假体周围骨中的探头和红外激光温度计测量骨温度和表面温度。使用千分尺测量变形。在植入前以及植入后每隔5分钟测量一次,直至30分钟。陶瓷头的平均骨温升高低于金属头。尽管这种差异没有统计学意义,但小尺寸(42和46毫米)的平均骨温增量变化高于大尺寸(48和50毫米)。大多数金属头在植入后30分钟时仍保持接近峰值的轴承直径变化,而陶瓷头的直径变化较小,且大多数样本在植入后30分钟恢复到原始直径。然而,两种植入物的表现相似,只是观察到陶瓷头导致的骨温升高较低。这可能会降低假体周围骨热损伤的风险。陶瓷头在手术植入过程中的变形较小。但这并不显著。