• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗停药或换药的原因。

Reasons for early discontinuing or switching of antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients after acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Jan;31(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000787.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000000787
PMID:31609757
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine frequency and reasons for prematurely discontinuing or switching antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients admitted with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

METHOD

Patients of 75 years or older admitted with suspected NSTE-ACS were included between 2013 and 2016. Information was extracted from the patients' medical files.

RESULTS

A total of 544 patients were included, 17.3% discontinued aspirin within one year, predominantly (57%) within 30 days. The most common reason was the start of a (non-vitamin-K) oral anticoagulant [(N)OAC], either combined with a P2Y12-inhibitor (43%) or as monotherapy (16%). The P2Y12-inhibitor was discontinued in 31.2% of patients within one year, of which 46% within 30 days. The most common reason was undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 22%). Switching of clopidogrel seldom occurred; however, ticagrelor was switched in 50/179 patients mainly due to dyspnoea (42%). Independent predictors for prematurely discontinuing antiplatelet therapy were undergoing CABG [odds ratio (OR) 3.257 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.836-5.779)], need for (N)OAC [OR 2.167 (95% CI 1.423-3.300)] and type II ACS as final diagnosis [OR 3.793 (95% CI 1.721-8.361)]. Undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [OR 0.393 (95% CI 0.243-0.634)] and use of clopidogrel [OR 0.441(95% CI 0.293-0.662)] were independent predictors of continuing antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients of at least 75 years with NSTE-ACS, antiplatelet therapy is frequently discontinued prematurely, most often within 30 days. Main reasons for discontinuing are need for (N)OAC, undergoing CABG or type II ACS as final diagnosis and suffering from dyspnoea while on ticagrelor.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定老年非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中断或转换抗血小板治疗的频率和原因。

方法

纳入 2013 年至 2016 年期间入院的年龄在 75 岁或以上的疑似 NSTE-ACS 患者。从患者的病历中提取信息。

结果

共纳入 544 例患者,17.3%的患者在一年内停用阿司匹林,主要(57%)在 30 天内。最常见的原因是开始使用(非维生素 K)口服抗凝剂[(N)OAC],联合使用 P2Y12 抑制剂(43%)或单独使用(16%)。一年内有 31.2%的患者停用 P2Y12 抑制剂,其中 46%在 30 天内。最常见的原因是行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG;22%)。氯吡格雷的转换很少发生,但 50/179 例患者改用替格瑞洛,主要因呼吸困难(42%)。过早停用抗血小板治疗的独立预测因素包括行 CABG[比值比(OR)3.257(95%置信区间[CI] 1.836-5.779])、需要(N)OAC[OR 2.167(95%CI 1.423-3.300)]和最终诊断为 II 型 ACS[OR 3.793(95%CI 1.721-8.361)]。行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗[OR 0.393(95%CI 0.243-0.634)]和使用氯吡格雷[OR 0.441(95%CI 0.293-0.662)]是继续抗血小板治疗的独立预测因素。

结论

在年龄至少 75 岁的 NSTE-ACS 老年患者中,抗血小板治疗经常过早中断,最常见于 30 天内。停药的主要原因是需要(N)OAC、行 CABG 或最终诊断为 II 型 ACS 以及使用替格瑞洛时出现呼吸困难。

相似文献

1
Reasons for early discontinuing or switching of antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients after acute coronary syndrome.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗停药或换药的原因。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Jan;31(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000787.
2
Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.在急性冠脉综合征(GEMINI-ACS-1)中,与低剂量利伐沙班加 P2Y12 抑制相比,加用阿司匹林导致临床显著出血:一项双盲、多中心、随机试验。
Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30751-1. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
3
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征中常规双联抗血小板治疗或阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:SMART-DATE 和 SMART-CHOICE 试验的汇总分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;150:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.03.053. Epub 2021 May 16.
4
Frequency and Reasons of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Discontinuation and Switching of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Stent Implantation.支架植入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗中断及P2Y12抑制剂转换的频率和原因
Cardiology. 2019;142(4):203-207. doi: 10.1159/000500977. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
6
Ticagrelor Does Not Improve Endothelial Dysfunction in Stable Survivors of Acute Coronary Syndrome.替格瑞洛对急性冠状动脉综合征稳定幸存者的内皮功能障碍无改善作用。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Sep;24(5):442-449. doi: 10.1177/1074248419841640. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Ticagrelor alone vs. ticagrelor plus aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: TWILIGHT-ACS.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后:TWILIGHT-ACS研究
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 1;41(37):3533-3545. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa670.
8
Safety of Preoperative Use of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin Compared With Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.替格瑞洛术前单独或联合阿司匹林与阿司匹林单独用于行冠状动脉旁路移植术的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的安全性比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;1(8):921-928. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3028.
9
Fewer gastrointestinal bleeds with ticagrelor and prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention.与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷可减少经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠脉综合征患者的胃肠道出血。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;52(4):646-654. doi: 10.1111/apt.15790. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Vitamin D levels and platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.糖尿病患者接受双联抗血小板治疗时的维生素 D 水平和血小板反应性。
Vascul Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;120:106564. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2019.106564. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clopidogrel therapy in acute coronary syndrome: Contemporary issues.急性冠状动脉综合征中的氯吡格雷治疗:当代问题
Indian Heart J. 2025 Jul-Aug;77(4):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Progress Analysis of Personalized Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing Interventional Therapy.冠心病介入治疗患者个性化抗血小板治疗的进展分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 25;25(12):462. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512462. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor in patients of 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.
70 岁及以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛的成本效益比较。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Dec 15;9(1):76-84. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac037.
4
Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Real-World Registry.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者:来自真实世界注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 15;9:859962. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.859962. eCollection 2022.
5
Risk of bleeding with ticagrelor in elderly patients over 75 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis.替格瑞洛在 75 岁以上老年患者中的出血风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 5;100(44):e27398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027398.