Cardiology Department, College of Medicine, Jeddah University, Saudi Arabia.
Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 5;100(44):e27398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027398.
Bleeding is an untoward outcome in the management of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although the potent oral P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor is clinically beneficial, its association with bleeding events in elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) is poorly understood.
We conducted a systematic search of 7 databases up to May 20, 2020 to identify studies which examined the risk of bleeding (defined according to each study) among elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) receiving ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Summary risk ratios (RR) were estimated using the random effects model.
Eight studies consisting of 5 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials involving 7032 elderly patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 12 months. Overall, the pooled RRs showed higher risk of a bleeding event with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (RR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.40; P = .017). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (Q = 6.93; P = .44; I2 = 0). Also, pooled RRs did not show a higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.92; P = .15) or minor bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76-1.58; P = .64) when comparing the ticagrelor to the clopidogrel group.
There is a 20% increased risk of a bleeding event in elderly ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel; for such patients, clopidogrel may be considered as an alternative agent to ticagrelor due to its lower risk of bleeding.
出血是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)老年患者治疗中出现的不良后果。尽管强效口服 P2Y12 抑制剂替格瑞洛具有临床益处,但它与老年 ACS 患者(≥75 岁)出血事件的关系尚不清楚。
我们系统地检索了 7 个数据库,截至 2020 年 5 月 20 日,以确定研究替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,在接受治疗的老年 ACS 患者(≥75 岁)中出血(根据每项研究定义)风险的研究。使用随机效应模型估计汇总风险比(RR)。
共有 8 项研究符合纳入标准,其中包括 5 项观察性研究和 3 项随机对照试验,涉及 7032 名老年患者。患者的平均年龄为 77.8 岁,平均随访时间为 12 个月。总体而言,汇总 RR 显示替格瑞洛治疗出血事件的风险高于氯吡格雷(RR 1.20,95%置信区间[95%CI] 1.03-1.40;P=0.017)。研究之间无统计学显著异质性(Q=6.93;P=0.44;I2=0)。此外,当比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷组时,主要出血(RR 1.32,95%置信区间 0.91-1.92;P=0.15)或次要出血(RR 1.09,95%置信区间 0.76-1.58;P=0.64)的汇总 RR 并未显示出血风险增加。
与氯吡格雷相比,接受替格瑞洛治疗的老年 ACS 患者出血事件的风险增加 20%;对于此类患者,由于出血风险较低,氯吡格雷可能被视为替格瑞洛的替代药物。