• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛在 75 岁以上老年患者中的出血风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk of bleeding with ticagrelor in elderly patients over 75 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, College of Medicine, Jeddah University, Saudi Arabia.

Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 5;100(44):e27398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027398.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000027398
PMID:34871206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is an untoward outcome in the management of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although the potent oral P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor is clinically beneficial, its association with bleeding events in elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) is poorly understood.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of 7 databases up to May 20, 2020 to identify studies which examined the risk of bleeding (defined according to each study) among elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) receiving ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Summary risk ratios (RR) were estimated using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Eight studies consisting of 5 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials involving 7032 elderly patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 12 months. Overall, the pooled RRs showed higher risk of a bleeding event with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (RR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.40; P = .017). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (Q = 6.93; P = .44; I2 = 0). Also, pooled RRs did not show a higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.92; P = .15) or minor bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76-1.58; P = .64) when comparing the ticagrelor to the clopidogrel group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a 20% increased risk of a bleeding event in elderly ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel; for such patients, clopidogrel may be considered as an alternative agent to ticagrelor due to its lower risk of bleeding.

摘要

背景

出血是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)老年患者治疗中出现的不良后果。尽管强效口服 P2Y12 抑制剂替格瑞洛具有临床益处,但它与老年 ACS 患者(≥75 岁)出血事件的关系尚不清楚。

方法

我们系统地检索了 7 个数据库,截至 2020 年 5 月 20 日,以确定研究替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,在接受治疗的老年 ACS 患者(≥75 岁)中出血(根据每项研究定义)风险的研究。使用随机效应模型估计汇总风险比(RR)。

结果

共有 8 项研究符合纳入标准,其中包括 5 项观察性研究和 3 项随机对照试验,涉及 7032 名老年患者。患者的平均年龄为 77.8 岁,平均随访时间为 12 个月。总体而言,汇总 RR 显示替格瑞洛治疗出血事件的风险高于氯吡格雷(RR 1.20,95%置信区间[95%CI] 1.03-1.40;P=0.017)。研究之间无统计学显著异质性(Q=6.93;P=0.44;I2=0)。此外,当比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷组时,主要出血(RR 1.32,95%置信区间 0.91-1.92;P=0.15)或次要出血(RR 1.09,95%置信区间 0.76-1.58;P=0.64)的汇总 RR 并未显示出血风险增加。

结论

与氯吡格雷相比,接受替格瑞洛治疗的老年 ACS 患者出血事件的风险增加 20%;对于此类患者,由于出血风险较低,氯吡格雷可能被视为替格瑞洛的替代药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/38fa36656c9b/medi-100-e27398-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/ca5a4c8a77c2/medi-100-e27398-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/a3a7e023a5ce/medi-100-e27398-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/8a17bf2e2f63/medi-100-e27398-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/38fa36656c9b/medi-100-e27398-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/ca5a4c8a77c2/medi-100-e27398-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/a3a7e023a5ce/medi-100-e27398-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/8a17bf2e2f63/medi-100-e27398-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6667/8568350/38fa36656c9b/medi-100-e27398-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of bleeding with ticagrelor in elderly patients over 75 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis.替格瑞洛在 75 岁以上老年患者中的出血风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 5;100(44):e27398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027398.
2
Clinically Significant Bleeding With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于拟行有创治疗的韩国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床显著出血比较:一项随机临床试验。
Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1865-1877. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041766. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于东亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):689-694. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Compared efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in treating acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0948-4.
5
De-escalation from Prasugrel or Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者从普拉格雷或替格瑞洛降级为氯吡格雷治疗:随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 May;22(3):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s40256-021-00504-7. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
6
Comparative effects of guided vs. potent P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of 61 898 patients from 15 randomized trials.比较指导下与强效 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗急性冠脉综合征的效果:来自 15 项随机试验的 61898 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 7;43(10):959-967. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab836.
7
Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes of Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Antiplatelet Agents Versus Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.强效P2Y12抑制剂抗血小板药物与氯吡格雷在老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的缺血和出血结局:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 May;38:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
8
Diabetes and CYP2C19 Polymorphism Synergistically Impair the Antiplatelet Activity of Clopidogrel Compared With Ticagrelor in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-treated Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.糖尿病与 CYP2C19 多态性协同作用削弱了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者氯吡格雷的抗血小板活性,而替格瑞洛则无此作用。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;76(4):478-488. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000881.
9
Prasugrel or ticagrelor relative to clopidogrel in triple-antiplatelet treatment combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor for patients with STEMI undergoing PCI: a meta-analysis.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷与氯吡格雷三联抗血小板治疗联合糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂用于接受 PCI 的 STEMI 患者:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01403-6.
10
Net clinical benefit of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in elderly patients carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患有急性冠状动脉综合征且携带CYP2C19功能丧失变异的老年患者中,氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛的净临床获益比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2024 Mar;390:117395. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117395. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Characteristics and Real-World Treatment of Very Elderly Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Japan: An Administrative Claims Database Study.日本非瓣膜性心房颤动高龄患者的患者特征及真实世界治疗:一项行政索赔数据库研究
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Mar;14(1):31-52. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00392-3. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Optimal anti-platelet therapy for older patients with acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising 59,284 older patients.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者的最佳抗血小板治疗:包含 59284 例老年患者的随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Jan;57(1):143-154. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02875-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
2
Efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor under NT-proBNP in hospitalized ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients on percutaneous coronary intervention: CCC-ACS Project Analysis.NT-proBNP水平下氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效:CCC-ACS项目分析
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
3
Reasons for early discontinuing or switching of antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients after acute coronary syndrome.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗停药或换药的原因。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Jan;31(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000787.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor in Comparison to Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效和安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 17;8(18):e012530. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012530. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
Ticagrelor for Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome in real-world practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.替格瑞洛在亚洲急性冠状动脉综合征患者真实世界实践中的应用:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian Heart J. 2019 Jan-Feb;71(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
6
Predictors of poor clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA).非阻塞性冠状动脉急性心肌梗死(MINOCA)患者临床预后不良的预测因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;267:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.092.
7
High bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with contemporary drug-eluting stents and Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor: Insights from CHANGE DAPT.在采用当代药物洗脱支架和氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征伴高出血风险患者中:来自 CHANGE DAPT 的研究结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.116. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于东亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):689-694. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Efficacy and safety of potent platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in elderly versus nonelderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.强效血小板P2Y12受体抑制剂在老年与非老年急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2018 Jan;195:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Corrigendum to: 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS.《2017年欧洲心脏病学会与欧洲心胸外科协会合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新》勘误
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 7;39(22):2089. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx638.