• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重受伤后 3 年内重返工作岗位的定性探索。

A Qualitative Exploration of Return to Work in the First 3-Years After Serious Injury.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, St Kilda Road, Monash University (Dr Braaf, Prof Collie, Prof Cameron, Prof Gabbe); School of Population Health, University of Auckland, St Johns, Auckland, New Zealand (Prof Ameratunga); Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, Beford Park, Adelaide (Prof Harrison); Trauma Service, The Royal Children's Hospital (Prof Teague); Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne (Prof Teague); Surgical Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (Prof Teague); Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College of London, London, United Kingdom (Prof Christie).

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;61(12):e461-e467. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001719.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001719
PMID:31609779
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore how people with serious injuries returned to paid employment in the first 3-years after injury.

METHODS

Fifty-four adult survivors of serious injuries were interviewed at 3-years post-injury, all of whom had returned to work and were currently employed. A framework analysis approach was undertaken.

RESULTS

Participant decisions and actions taken to return to work (RTW) were influenced by their resilience, approach to adjusting goals, priorities and plans, and how social connections and relationships were used and maintained. The environment in which these decisions and actions were taken shaped opportunities for work in meaningful, appropriate, and sustained employment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study of 54 people who RTW indicated the importance of personal adjustments and resources, positive social relations, and advanced planning aligning with responsive employers, insurers and health professionals for successful RTW.

摘要

目的

探讨严重受伤者在受伤后 3 年内如何重返有偿工作。

方法

对 54 名严重受伤的成年幸存者进行了访谈,他们均在受伤后 3 年内重返工作岗位并继续工作。采用框架分析方法。

结果

参与者重返工作(RTW)的决定和采取的行动受到他们的适应能力、调整目标、优先事项和计划的方法以及如何利用和维持社会关系的影响。做出这些决定和采取这些行动的环境为从事有意义、适当和持续就业的工作创造了机会。

结论

我们对 54 名 RTW 人员的研究表明,个人调整和资源、积极的社会关系以及与响应性雇主、保险公司和卫生专业人员协调一致的前瞻性计划对于成功 RTW 非常重要。

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Exploration of Return to Work in the First 3-Years After Serious Injury.严重受伤后 3 年内重返工作岗位的定性探索。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;61(12):e461-e467. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001719.
2
Return to work for severely injured survivors of the Christchurch earthquake: influences in the first 2 years.克赖斯特彻奇地震重伤幸存者的重返工作情况:头两年的影响因素
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(10):987-93. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1070299. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
3
Twelve-month work-related outcomes following hip fracture in patients under 65 years of age.65岁以下髋部骨折患者的12个月工作相关结局
Injury. 2017 Mar;48(3):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
4
Patterns and Predictors of Return to Work After Major Trauma: A Prospective, Population-based Registry Study.重大创伤后重返工作岗位的模式和预测因素:一项前瞻性、基于人群的登记研究。
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):972-978. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002666.
5
Patterns and Predictors of Failed and Sustained Return-to-Work in Transport Injury Insurance Claimants.交通伤害保险索赔人失败和持续重返工作岗位的模式和预测因素。
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Dec;28(4):740-748. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9761-2.
6
Factors associated with return-to-work and health outcomes among survivors of road crashes in Victoria.与维多利亚州道路碰撞幸存者重返工作岗位和健康结果相关的因素。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Apr;34(2):153-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00500.x.
7
Mortality, functional and return to work outcomes of major trauma patients injured from deliberate self-harm.因故意自残而受伤的重大创伤患者的死亡率、功能状况及重返工作岗位情况
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):184-194. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
Prevalence and predictors of return to work in hospitalised trauma patients during the first year after discharge: a prospective cohort study.创伤住院患者出院后 1 年内重返工作岗位的发生率及预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1606-13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.038. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
9
Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: a qualitative study using the ICF as a framework.支持早期重返工作岗位的环境和个人因素:一项以国际功能、残疾和健康分类为框架的定性研究
Work. 2014;48(2):203-15. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131657.
10
Return to work or job transition? Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice.重返工作岗位还是职业转型?当地职场实践中雇主在承担重返工作岗位社会责任方面的困境。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(19):1760-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.978509. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
What Works (or Doesn't) in Return to Work after Physical Injury? A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Trauma Patients and Health Care Professionals on Barriers and Facilitators in Return to Work.身体受伤后重返工作岗位的有效方法(或无效方法)是什么?一项关于创伤患者和医护人员对重返工作岗位的障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10309-z.
2
Priorities for returning to work after traumatic injury: A public and professional involvement study.创伤性损伤后重返工作岗位的优先事项:一项公众与专业人士参与的研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Dec;85(12):974-983. doi: 10.1177/03080226221107772. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
Factors associated with long term work incapacity following a non-catastrophic road traffic injury: analysis of a two-year prospective cohort study.
与非灾难性道路交通事故伤害后长期工作能力丧失相关的因素:一项为期两年的前瞻性队列研究分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):1498. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13884-5.
4
A Standpoint Approach to Return-to-Work Coordination: Understanding Union Roles.一种重返工作岗位协调的立场方法:理解工会的作用。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep;32(3):564-573. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10025-y. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Patient Perspectives on Key Outcomes for Vocational Rehabilitation Interventions Following Traumatic Injury.创伤后职业康复干预关键结局的患者观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042035.