Suppr超能文献

评估快速诊断检测和传统酶联免疫吸附测定法以确定既往登革热感染。

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests and conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to determine prior dengue infection.

机构信息

Global Clinical Immunology, Sanofi Pasteur, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater PA 18370, USA.

Global Biostatistics, Sanofi Pasteur, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater PA 18370, USA.

出版信息

J Travel Med. 2019 Dec 23;26(8). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taz078.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In September 2018, the World Health Organization recommended that prevaccination screening be used with the tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV), to ensure that only individuals with evidence of prior dengue infection (PDI) are vaccinated. Dengue rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) would offer a potential solution for prevaccination screening at the point-of-care, but data on performance of available RDTs for identifying PDI are limited. We determined the suitability of four dengue RDTs and two conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to identify PDI and evaluated cross-reactivity with co-circulating flaviviruses.

UNLABELLED

Methods: Specificity was assessed using 534 dengue-negative [determined by 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50)] serum samples from USA (n = 229) and dengue-endemic regions (n = 305). Sensitivity was assessed using 270 samples from recent (n = 90) or remote (n = 90) virologically confirmed prior dengue cases, and dengue PRNT50-positive samples (n = 90). Cross-reactivity was assessed in dengue-seronegative samples that were seropositive for yellow fever (n = 57), Japanese encephalitis (n = 37), West Nile (n = 59) or Zika (n = 41).

UNLABELLED

Results: Dengue IgG RDTs and the Panbio ELISA exhibited favourable specificities (99-100%), higher than the Focus ELISA (95%). The RDTs had variable sensitivities (40-70%) that were lower than those of the ELISAs (≥90%). Cross-reactivity to other flaviviruses was low with RDTs (≤7%), but more significant with ELISAs (up to 51% for West Nile and 34% for Zika). No cross-reactivity to any of the four closely related flaviviruses was observed with the CTK Biotech RDT. For each SeroTest, sensitivity appeared similar in samples from individuals with recent (<13 months) vs remote (3-4 years) virologically confirmed PDI.

UNLABELLED

Conclusions: In general, dengue IgG RDTs were found to be more specific and less cross-reactive than the ELISAs, but the latter were more sensitive for identifying PDI cases. Currently available RDTs could be temporizing tools for rapid and safe prevaccination screening until improved RDTs with increased sensitivity become available.

摘要

背景

2018 年 9 月,世界卫生组织建议使用四价登革热疫苗(CYD-TDV)进行疫苗接种前筛查,以确保只有有登革热既往感染(PDI)证据的个体接种疫苗。登革热快速诊断检测(RDT)将为在护理点进行疫苗接种前筛查提供一种潜在的解决方案,但目前可用的 RDT 用于识别 PDI 的性能数据有限。我们确定了四种登革热 RDT 和两种常规酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于识别 PDI 的适用性,并评估了与共同循环的黄病毒的交叉反应性。

无标签

方法:使用来自美国(n=229)和登革热流行地区(n=305)的 534 份登革热阴性[通过 50%斑块减少中和试验(PRNT50)确定]血清样本评估特异性。使用最近(n=90)或远程(n=90)病毒学证实的既往登革热病例和登革热 PRNT50 阳性样本(n=90)评估敏感性。在登革热血清阴性但黄热病(n=57)、日本脑炎(n=37)、西尼罗河(n=59)或寨卡(n=41)血清阳性的样本中评估交叉反应性。

无标签

结果:登革热 IgG RDT 和 Panbio ELISA 表现出良好的特异性(99-100%),高于 Focus ELISA(95%)。RDT 的敏感性(40-70%)低于 ELISA(≥90%)。与 RDT 相比,与其他黄病毒的交叉反应性较低(≤7%),但与 ELISA 相比,交叉反应性更高(西尼罗河高达 51%,寨卡 34%)。与 CTK Biotech RDT 无任何四种密切相关黄病毒的交叉反应。对于每个 SeroTest,在近期(<13 个月)和远程(3-4 年)病毒学证实的 PDI 个体的样本中,敏感性似乎相似。

无标签

结论:一般来说,与 ELISA 相比,登革热 IgG RDT 的特异性更高,交叉反应性更低,但后者更能敏感地识别 PDI 病例。目前可用的 RDT 可以作为快速安全疫苗接种前筛查的临时工具,直到灵敏度更高的改进型 RDT 可用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验