• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic indications.妇科适应症微创手术的最新进展。
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2018 Dec;35(2):150-155. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2018.35.2.150. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
2
Meta-analysis of Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Multiport Hysterectomy: Real Benefits or Diminishing Returns?腹腔镜单孔与阴道自然腔道内镜子宫切除术与多孔子宫切除术的荟萃分析:真正的获益还是收益递减?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):698-709.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.029. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.机器人经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)子宫切除术作为一种无疤痕、无气腹手术。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07115-z. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.机器人技术在妇科良性手术中的优势。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;28(4):304-10. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000293.
6
Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人子宫肌瘤剔除术。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):414-416. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Revolution: The Next Frontier in Gynecologic Minimally Invasive Surgery.阴道自然腔道内镜手术革命:妇科微创外科的下一个前沿领域。
JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00082.
8
Comparison of Outcomes following Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery in Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜下单孔手术在良性子宫切除术中的结局比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Sep 7;12(4):195-202. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_88_22. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
9
Review of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in gynecology.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在妇科中的综述。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Repeat Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A First Feasibility Study.重复阴道自然腔道内镜手术:初步可行性研究。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021;86(1-2):117-122. doi: 10.1159/000513403. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian cysts: a retrospective cohort study.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗良性卵巢囊肿的回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02710-x.
2
Innovative ICG Application in Benign Gynaecological Surgery: Enhancing Safety and Precision.吲哚菁绿在妇科良性手术中的创新应用:提高安全性与精准度。
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul 26;2024:1642315. doi: 10.1155/2024/1642315. eCollection 2024.
3
Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women's Lives.优化子宫切除术:手术技术的前瞻性比较分析及其对女性生活的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 29;14(3):265. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030265.
4
Teres lift-up technique: a retrospective comparative study for an alternative route for laparoscopic entry in gynecologic and oncologic surgery.提拉式经脐入路技术:妇科和肿瘤外科腹腔镜入路的一种替代途径的回顾性对比研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1549-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07191-6. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
Serosal Injury to a Distended Stomach during Open Entry for Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery.腹腔镜单孔手术开放入路时扩张胃的浆膜损伤
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 May 4;11(2):121-123. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_53_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
6
Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description.腹腔镜单孔全子宫切除术:文献综述与手术描述
J Clin Med. 2021 May 12;10(10):2073. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102073.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update.单部位端口机器人辅助子宫切除术:最新进展
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):201-213. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0789-2. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Vaginal Cuff Closure in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Review of Training, Techniques, and Materials.微创子宫切除术中阴道残端闭合术:培训、技术及材料综述
Cureus. 2017 Oct 11;9(10):e1766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1766.
3
Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件疾病的系统评价和Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1083-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
Comparison study of consecutive 100 cases of single port vs. multiport laparoscopic myomectomy; technical point of view.连续100例单孔与多孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的比较研究:技术视角
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jul;37(5):616-621. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1281896. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
In Search for the Best Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approach for the Large Uterus: A Review.寻找治疗大子宫的最佳微创子宫切除术方法:综述
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60(2):286-295. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000285.
7
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Gynecology.妇科自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60(2):324-329. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000280.
8
Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)与腹腔镜手术治疗非脱垂子宫和良性妇科疾病女性子宫切除术后的结局及生活质量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.044. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: An update.妇科肿瘤的腹腔镜单孔手术:最新进展
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jun;141(3):616-623. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜单孔手术治疗良性子宫切除术的疗效比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.883. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

妇科适应症微创手术的最新进展。

Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic indications.

作者信息

Koo Yu-Jin

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2018 Dec;35(2):150-155. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2018.35.2.150. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

DOI:10.12701/yujm.2018.35.2.150
PMID:31620587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6784696/
Abstract

Recently, an increasing interest in less invasive surgery has led to the advent of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). LESS and NOTES could be technically challenging, but available literature has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of LESS for benign gynecologic diseases. However, the evidence is not strong enough to recommend the use of LESS over that of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MLS). As per the results of the most recently published meta-analysis, the majority of surgical outcomes are equivalent between LESS and MLS, except for the longer operative time in LESS for both adnexal surgery and hysterectomy. Although an increasing number of studies have reported on robotic LESS, NOTES, and LESS for gynecologic malignancy, definite conclusions have not been drawn owing to the lack of sufficient information.

摘要

近年来,人们对微创手术的兴趣日益浓厚,催生了腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)和经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)。LESS和NOTES在技术上可能具有挑战性,但现有文献已证明LESS用于良性妇科疾病的可行性和安全性。然而,证据还不够充分,不足以推荐使用LESS而非传统的多端口腹腔镜手术(MLS)。根据最近发表的荟萃分析结果,LESS和MLS的大多数手术结果相当,但LESS进行附件手术和子宫切除术的手术时间较长。尽管越来越多的研究报道了机器人辅助LESS、NOTES以及LESS用于妇科恶性肿瘤的情况,但由于缺乏足够的信息,尚未得出明确结论。