Koo Yu-Jin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2018 Dec;35(2):150-155. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2018.35.2.150. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
Recently, an increasing interest in less invasive surgery has led to the advent of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). LESS and NOTES could be technically challenging, but available literature has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of LESS for benign gynecologic diseases. However, the evidence is not strong enough to recommend the use of LESS over that of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MLS). As per the results of the most recently published meta-analysis, the majority of surgical outcomes are equivalent between LESS and MLS, except for the longer operative time in LESS for both adnexal surgery and hysterectomy. Although an increasing number of studies have reported on robotic LESS, NOTES, and LESS for gynecologic malignancy, definite conclusions have not been drawn owing to the lack of sufficient information.
近年来,人们对微创手术的兴趣日益浓厚,催生了腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)和经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)。LESS和NOTES在技术上可能具有挑战性,但现有文献已证明LESS用于良性妇科疾病的可行性和安全性。然而,证据还不够充分,不足以推荐使用LESS而非传统的多端口腹腔镜手术(MLS)。根据最近发表的荟萃分析结果,LESS和MLS的大多数手术结果相当,但LESS进行附件手术和子宫切除术的手术时间较长。尽管越来越多的研究报道了机器人辅助LESS、NOTES以及LESS用于妇科恶性肿瘤的情况,但由于缺乏足够的信息,尚未得出明确结论。