Department of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Department of Health Services, Practice and Policy, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):198-206. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16210. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
We aimed to describe a new multidisciplinary team fall prevention intervention for older adults who seek care in the emergency department (ED) after having a fall, assess its feasibility and acceptability, and review lessons learned during its initiation.
Single-blind randomized controlled pilot study.
Two urban academic EDs PARTICIPANTS: Adults 65 years old or older (n = 110) who presented to the ED within 7 days of a fall.
Participants were randomized to a usual care (UC) and an intervention (INT) arm. Participants in the INT arm received a brief medication therapy management session delivered by a pharmacist and a fall risk assessment and plan by a physical therapist (PT). INT participants received referrals to outpatient services (eg, home safety evaluation, outpatient PT).
We used participant, caregiver, and clinician surveys, as well as electronic health record review, to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.
Of the 110 participants, the median participant age was 81 years old, 67% were female, 94% were white, and 16.3% had cognitive impairment. Of the 55 in the INT arm, all but one participant received the pharmacy consult (98.2%); the PT consult was delivered to 83.6%. Median consult time was 20 minutes for pharmacy and 20 minutes for PT. ED length of stay was not increased in the INT arm: UC 5.25 hours vs INT 5.0 hours (P < .94). After receiving the Geriatric Acute and Post-acute Fall Prevention Intervention (GAPcare), 100% of participants and 97.6% of clinicians recommended the pharmacy consult, and 95% of participants and 95.8% of clinicians recommended the PT consult.
These findings support the feasibility and acceptability of the GAPcare model in the ED. A future larger randomized controlled trial is planned to determine whether GAPcare can reduce recurrent falls and healthcare visits in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:198-206, 2019.
我们旨在描述一种新的多学科团队跌倒预防干预措施,适用于因跌倒而在急诊科(ED)就诊的老年患者,评估其可行性和可接受性,并回顾启动过程中的经验教训。
单盲随机对照试点研究。
两家城市学术 ED
年龄在 65 岁及以上(n = 110),在跌倒后 7 天内就诊于 ED。
参与者被随机分配到常规护理(UC)和干预(INT)组。INT 组的参与者接受药剂师进行的简短药物治疗管理,以及物理治疗师(PT)进行的跌倒风险评估和计划。INT 组的参与者获得了门诊服务的转诊(例如,家庭安全评估、门诊 PT)。
我们使用参与者、照顾者和临床医生的调查,以及电子健康记录审查,评估干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
110 名参与者中,中位参与者年龄为 81 岁,67%为女性,94%为白人,16.3%有认知障碍。在 INT 组的 55 名参与者中,除 1 人外,所有人都接受了药房咨询(98.2%);PT 咨询交付给 83.6%的人。药房咨询的中位数时间为 20 分钟,PT 咨询的中位数时间为 20 分钟。INT 组 ED 住院时间未增加:UC 5.25 小时与 INT 5.0 小时(P>.94)。接受老年急性和急性后跌倒预防干预(GAPcare)后,100%的参与者和 97.6%的临床医生推荐药房咨询,95%的参与者和 95.8%的临床医生推荐 PT 咨询。
这些发现支持 GAPcare 模型在 ED 中的可行性和可接受性。计划进行一项更大的未来随机对照试验,以确定 GAPcare 是否可以减少老年患者的复发性跌倒和医疗就诊次数。美国老年学会杂志 68:198-206,2019。