Gijbels Jolien
Bull Hist Med. 2019;93(3):305-334. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2019.0029.
Situated on the intersection of medicine and religion, postmortem caesarean sections exposed ideological boundaries in nineteenth-century medicine. According to clerical guidelines circulating in Catholic territories, Catholics who had not necessarily received medical training had to perform operations on deceased women in the absence of medical staff. Most doctors, on the other hand, objected to surgical interventions by unqualified Catholics. This article uses the Belgian debates about the postmortem caesarean section as a means to investigate methods of negotiation between liberal and Catholic doctors. The article analyzes, first, how doctors incorporated religious concerns such as baptism in the medical profession. Second, physicians' strategies to come to a compromise in ideologically diverse settings are examined. Overall, this article casts light on the dynamics of medical debate in times of both ideological rapprochement and polarization.
尸体剖腹产手术处于医学与宗教的交叉点上,暴露了19世纪医学中的意识形态界限。根据天主教地区流传的神职人员指导方针,不一定接受过医学培训的天主教徒必须在没有医务人员的情况下对已故女性进行手术。另一方面,大多数医生反对不合格的天主教徒进行外科干预。本文以比利时关于尸体剖腹产手术的辩论为手段,研究自由派医生和天主教医生之间的协商方法。文章首先分析了医生如何将诸如洗礼等宗教问题纳入医学领域。其次,研究了医生在意识形态多元的环境中达成妥协的策略。总体而言,本文揭示了意识形态和解与两极分化时期医学辩论的动态。