Create Fertility Centre, 790 Bay Street, Suite 1100, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1N8, Canada.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S, Canada.
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Nov 5;25(6):694-716. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz026.
Many transgender individuals choose to undergo gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) and/or sex reassignment surgery (SRS) to alleviate the distress that is associated with gender dysphoria. Although these treatment options often succeed in alleviating such symptoms, they can also negatively impact future reproductive potential.
The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the available psychosocial and medical literature on fertility preservation (FP) for transgender adolescents and young adults (TAYAs), to identify gaps in the current research and provide suggestions for future research directions.
A systematic review of English peer-reviewed papers published from 2001 onwards, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines, was conducted. Four journal databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase and Ovid PsychINFO) were used to identify all relevant studies exploring psychosocial or medical aspects of FP in TAYAs. The search strategy used a combination of subject headings and generic terms related to the study topic and population. Bibliographies of the selected articles were also hand searched and cross-checked to ensure comprehensive coverage. All selected papers were independently reviewed by the co-authors. Characteristics of the studies, objectives and key findings were extracted, and a systematic review was conducted.
Included in the study were 19 psychosocial-based research papers and 21 medical-based research papers that explore fertility-related aspects specific for this population. Key psychosocial themes included the desire to have children for TAYAs; FP discussions, counselling and referrals provided by healthcare providers (HCPs); FP utilization; the attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of TAYAs, HCPs and the parents/guardians of TAYAs; and barriers to accessing FP. Key medical themes included fertility-related effects of GAHT, FP options and outcomes. From a synthesis of the literature, we conclude that there are many barriers preventing TAYAs from pursuing FP, including a lack of awareness of FP options, high costs, invasiveness of the available procedures and the potential psychological impact of the FP process. The available medical data on the reproductive effects of GAHT are diverse, and while detrimental effects are anticipated, the extent to which these effects are reversible is unknown.
FP counselling should begin as early as possible as a standard of care before GAHT to allow time for informed decisions. The current lack of high-quality medical data specific to FP counselling practice for this population means there is a reliance on expert opinion and extrapolation from studies in the cisgender population. Future research should include large-scale cohort studies (preferably multi-centered), longitudinal studies of TAYAs across the FP process, qualitative studies of the parents/guardians of TAYAs and studies evaluating the effectiveness of different strategies to improve the attitudes, knowledge and beliefs of HCPs.
许多跨性别者选择接受性别肯定激素治疗(GAHT)和/或性别重置手术(SRS),以减轻与性别焦虑相关的痛苦。尽管这些治疗方法通常成功地缓解了这些症状,但它们也可能对未来的生殖潜力产生负面影响。
本系统评价的目的是综合现有的关于跨性别青少年和年轻人(TAYAs)的生育力保存(FP)的心理社会和医学文献,以确定当前研究中的差距,并为未来的研究方向提供建议。
使用 PRISMA-P 指南对 2001 年以后发表的英语同行评议论文进行了系统评价。使用了四个期刊数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed Medline、Ovid Embase 和 Ovid PsychINFO),以确定所有探讨 TAYAs 中 FP 的心理社会或医学方面的相关研究。搜索策略使用了与研究主题和人群相关的主题词和通用术语的组合。还对选定文章的参考文献进行了手工搜索和交叉核对,以确保全面覆盖。所有选定的论文都由共同作者独立审查。提取了研究的特征、目标和主要发现,并进行了系统评价。
本研究纳入了 19 篇基于心理社会的研究论文和 21 篇基于医学的研究论文,探讨了针对这一人群的与生育力相关的特定方面。主要的心理社会主题包括 TAYAs 想要生育孩子;医疗保健提供者(HCPs)提供的 FP 讨论、咨询和转介;FP 的利用;TAYAs、HCPs 和 TAYAs 的父母/监护人的态度、知识和信念;以及获取 FP 的障碍。主要的医学主题包括 GAHT 对生育能力的影响、FP 选择和结果。从文献综合来看,我们得出结论,有许多障碍阻止 TAYAs 追求 FP,包括对 FP 选择缺乏认识、费用高、现有程序的侵入性以及 FP 过程的潜在心理影响。目前关于 GAHT 对生殖影响的医学数据多种多样,虽然预计会产生不利影响,但这些影响的可逆程度尚不清楚。
在 GAHT 之前,FP 咨询应尽早作为护理标准开始,以便有时间做出知情决策。目前,针对这一人群的 FP 咨询实践缺乏特定的高质量医学数据,这意味着只能依赖专家意见和从顺性别人群的研究中推断。未来的研究应包括大规模队列研究(最好是多中心)、FP 过程中 TAYAs 的纵向研究、TAYAs 父母/监护人的定性研究以及评估不同策略有效性的研究,以改善 HCPs 的态度、知识和信念。