• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性不育症在线讨论板分析。

Analysis of online discussion boards for male infertility.

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Andrologia. 2019 Dec;51(11):e13422. doi: 10.1111/and.13422. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1111/and.13422
PMID:31642097
Abstract

We aimed to identify what information patients and partners are seeking on male infertility forums. Online discussion boards were identified. Posts were analysed in three steps: open coding, axial coding and selective coding, to determine common themes. A total of 1,118 posts were analysed. The majority of posts (20.2%) were related to "Questions about male fertility diagnosis and testing", with 47.8% asking for assistance interpreting semen analysis results. About 15.7% of posts were about "Feelings associated with male infertility", with 26.7% expressing anger or frustration, 26.1% encouraging hope, 21% seeking hope and 12.5% expressing fear. About 15.4% of posts were about "Lifestyle factors to improve male fertility", 24.4% of which were about vitamins and 6.4% about intercourse timing. About 15.4% of posts were about "Male infertility conditions", with 43% about semen parameters. Other themes included "Questions about male factor treatments", "Questions about assisted reproductive technologies (ART)", "Relationship issues", "Asking for advice", "Financial concerns" and "Information sharing". About 63.6% of posts were written by female partners [t(1,117) = 9.451, p < .001]. The most common posts posed questions about male fertility diagnosis and testing. Users discussed feelings involved in infertility, and counselling should be integrated. About 63.6% of posts were by partners, highlighting the importance of partners having access to infertility information.

摘要

我们旨在确定患者和伴侣在男性不育症论坛上寻求哪些信息。确定了在线讨论板。帖子在三个步骤中进行了分析:开放式编码、轴向编码和选择性编码,以确定常见主题。共分析了 1118 个帖子。大多数帖子(20.2%)与“男性生育力诊断和检测相关问题”有关,其中 47.8%要求协助解读精液分析结果。约 15.7%的帖子与“与男性不育相关的感受”有关,其中 26.7%表达愤怒或沮丧,26.1%鼓励希望,21%寻求希望,12.5%表示恐惧。约 15.4%的帖子与“改善男性生育力的生活方式因素”有关,其中 24.4%与维生素有关,6.4%与性交时间有关。约 15.4%的帖子与“男性不育症状况”有关,其中 43%与精液参数有关。其他主题包括“关于男性因素治疗的问题”、“关于辅助生殖技术(ART)的问题”、“关系问题”、“寻求建议”、“财务问题”和“信息共享”。约 63.6%的帖子是由女性伴侣撰写的[t(1,117)=9.451,p<0.001]。最常见的帖子提出了关于男性生育力诊断和检测的问题。用户讨论了与不育症相关的感受,应该整合咨询。约 63.6%的帖子是由伴侣撰写的,这突出了伴侣获取不育症信息的重要性。

相似文献

1
Analysis of online discussion boards for male infertility.男性不育症在线讨论板分析。
Andrologia. 2019 Dec;51(11):e13422. doi: 10.1111/and.13422. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.大多数骨肉瘤患者寻求情感支持和其他患者经验的信息:主题分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
A Thematic Analysis of Online Discussion Boards for Vasectomy.输精管切除术在线讨论板的主题分析
Urology. 2018 Jan;111:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.061. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
4
Thematic analysis of online discussion forums for soft tissue sarcomas.软组织肉瘤在线论坛的主题分析。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2023;37:100773. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100773. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
5
A qualitative analysis of patient and caregiver experiences with myelomeningocele through online discussion boards.通过在线讨论板对脊髓脊膜膨出患者及照料者经历的定性分析。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Jun;40(6):1783-1790. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06331-w. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
A Thematic Analysis of Online Discussion Boards for Brachial Plexus Injury.臂丛神经损伤在线讨论板的主题分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Aug;41(8):813-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
7
Understanding Patient Anxieties in the Social Media Era: Qualitative Analysis and Natural Language Processing of an Online Male Infertility Community.理解社交媒体时代患者的焦虑情绪:对一个在线男性不育症社区的定性分析与自然语言处理
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 10;22(3):e16728. doi: 10.2196/16728.
8
Scope, Themes, and Medical Accuracy of eHealth Peripheral Artery Disease Community Forums.电子健康外周动脉疾病社区论坛的范围、主题及医学准确性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
Patient and caregiver perceptions of Chiari malformation: a qualitative analysis of online discussion boards.患者和照护者对 Chiari 畸形的认知:在线讨论板的定性分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Feb 2;33(4):382-389. doi: 10.3171/2023.11.PEDS23448. Print 2024 Apr 1.
10
Congenital Upper-Extremity Differences: A Thematic Analysis of On-Line Discussion Boards.先天性上肢差异:在线讨论板的主题分析。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Apr;46(4):337.e1-337.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Dietary Supplements on Male Infertility in Terms of Pregnancy, Live Birth, and Sperm Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.膳食补充剂对男性不育症在妊娠、活产和精子参数方面的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2025 May 18;17(10):1710. doi: 10.3390/nu17101710.
2
Does outdoor air pollution cause poor semen quality? A systematic review and meta-analysis.室外空气污染会导致精液质量差吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01728-4.
3
Understanding Patient Anxieties in the Social Media Era: Qualitative Analysis and Natural Language Processing of an Online Male Infertility Community.
理解社交媒体时代患者的焦虑情绪:对一个在线男性不育症社区的定性分析与自然语言处理
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 10;22(3):e16728. doi: 10.2196/16728.