Suppr超能文献

两种真皮再生模板在人类烧伤瘢痕挛缩重建中的长期比较研究:临床和组织学结果。

Comparative long-term study between two dermal regeneration templates for the reconstruction of burn scar contractures in humans: Clinical and histological results.

机构信息

Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR. Divisao de Cirurgia Plastica e Queimaduras.

Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR. Laboratorio de Biologia Celular, LIM59, Departamento de Patologia.

出版信息

Burns. 2020 May;46(3):596-608. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 20.

Abstract

The advent of dermal regeneration templates has fostered major advances in the treatment of acute burns and their sequelae, in the last three decades. Both data on morphological aspects of the newly-formed tissue, and clinical trials comparing different templates, are few. The goal of this study was to prospectively analyze the outcome of randomized patients treated with two of the existing templates, followed by thin skin autograft. They are both 2 mm-thick bovine collagen templates (Matriderm® and Integra®), the latter includes a superficial silicone layer. Surgery was performed on patients with impaired mobility resulting from burn sequelae (n = 12 per template) in a two-step procedure. Negative pressure therapy was applied after surgery; patients were monitored for 12 months. No intra or postoperative complications were observed. Data on scar skin quality (Vancouver scar scale), rate of mobility recovery, and graft contraction were recorded; as well as morphological analyses at light microscopical level. Improvement in mobility and skin quality were demonstrated along with graft contraction, in all patients. The double layer template showed the best performance in retraction rate, skin quality and mobility recovery. The subepidermal newly-formed connective tissue showed no histoarchitectural differences between the templates. The double layer template was not absorbed up to 12 months after placement.

摘要

在过去的三十年中,皮肤再生模板的出现促进了急性烧伤及其后遗症治疗的重大进展。关于新形成组织的形态学方面的数据,以及比较不同模板的临床试验都很少。本研究的目的是前瞻性分析随机分组的患者接受两种现有模板(均为 2mm 厚的牛胶原蛋白模板,即 Matriderm®和 Integra®,后者包含一层浅层硅胶)和薄皮自体移植治疗的结果。这些患者因烧伤后遗症而行动不便(每组模板 12 例),采用两步手术进行治疗。手术后应用负压治疗,患者接受 12 个月的监测。未观察到术中或术后并发症。记录了疤痕皮肤质量(温哥华疤痕量表)、活动度恢复率和移植物收缩率,以及光镜下的形态学分析。所有患者的活动度和皮肤质量均得到改善,同时移植物收缩。双层模板在收缩率、皮肤质量和活动度恢复方面表现最佳。在放置后 12 个月内,皮下新形成的结缔组织在两种模板之间没有组织学差异。双层模板在放置后 12 个月内并未被吸收。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验