Suppr超能文献

患者-临床医生互动与乳腺癌护理差距:乳腺癌护理公平研究。

Patient-clinician interactions and disparities in breast cancer care: the equality in breast cancer care study.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, The Colorado Trust, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):968-980. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00820-7. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine whether interpersonal aspects of patient-clinician interactions, such as patient-perceived medical discrimination, clinician mistrust, and treatment decision-making contribute to racial/ethnic/educational disparities in breast cancer care.

METHODS

A telephone interview was administered to 542 Asian/Pacific Islander (API), Black, Hispanic, and White women identified through the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, ages 20 and older diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from logistic regression models that assessed associations between race/ethnicity/education, medical discrimination, clinician mistrust, and treatment decision-making with concordance to breast cancer treatment guidelines (guideline-concordant treatment) and perceived quality of care (pQoC).

RESULTS

Approximately three-quarters of women received treatment that was guideline-concordant (76.6%) and reported that their breast cancer care was excellent (72.1%). Non-college-educated Black women had lower odds of guideline-concordant care (aOR (CI) = 0.29 (0.12-0.67)) vs. college-educated White women. Odds of excellent pQoC were lower among the following: college-educated Hispanic women (aOR (CI) = 0.09 (0.02-0.47)) and API women regardless of education (aORs ≤ 0.50) vs. college-educated White women, women reporting low and moderate levels of discrimination (aORs ≤ 0.44) vs. none, and women reporting any clinician mistrust (aOR (CI) = 0.50 (0.29-0.88)) vs. none. Disparities in guideline-concordant care and pQoC persisted after controlling for medical discrimination, clinician mistrust, and decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Interpersonal aspects of the patient-clinician interaction had an impact on pQoC but not receipt of guideline-concordant treatment and did not explain disparities in either outcome.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Although breast cancer survivors' interpersonal interactions with clinicians did not influence receipt of appropriate treatment, intervention strategies to improve patient-clinician relations may help attenuate disparities in survivors' pQoC.

摘要

目的

探讨医患互动中的人际方面,如患者感知的医疗歧视、医生不信任以及治疗决策是否会导致乳腺癌护理中的种族/民族/教育差异。

方法

通过加利福尼亚海湾地区癌症登记处,对 542 名年龄在 20 岁及以上、被诊断为首次原发性浸润性乳腺癌的亚裔/太平洋岛民(API)、黑种人、西班牙裔和白种妇女进行了电话采访。使用逻辑回归模型评估了种族/民族/教育、医疗歧视、医生不信任和治疗决策与乳腺癌治疗指南(指南一致的治疗)和感知护理质量(pQoC)之间的关联,计算了调整后的优势比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

大约四分之三的妇女接受了符合指南的治疗(76.6%),并报告她们的乳腺癌护理非常出色(72.1%)。与受过大学教育的白人妇女相比,未受过大学教育的黑人妇女接受符合指南的治疗的可能性较低(aOR(CI)=0.29(0.12-0.67))。以下人群的优秀 pQoC 几率较低:受过大学教育的西班牙裔妇女(aOR(CI)=0.09(0.02-0.47))和无论教育程度如何的 API 妇女(aORs≤0.50)与受过大学教育的白人妇女相比,报告低和中度歧视的妇女(aORs≤0.44)与无报告者相比,以及报告任何医生不信任的妇女(aOR(CI)=0.50(0.29-0.88))与无报告者相比。在控制了医疗歧视、医生不信任和决策后,符合指南的治疗和 pQoC 的差异仍然存在。

结论

医患互动中的人际方面对 pQoC 有影响,但对接受符合指南的治疗没有影响,也不能解释这两种结果的差异。

意义

尽管乳腺癌幸存者与医生的人际互动并未影响接受适当的治疗,但干预策略改善医患关系可能有助于减轻幸存者 pQoC 的差异。

相似文献

1
Patient-clinician interactions and disparities in breast cancer care: the equality in breast cancer care study.
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):968-980. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00820-7. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
2
Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):398.e1-398.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.041. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
3
5
Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Does Not Explain Breast Cancer Mortality Disparities by Race in Metropolitan Atlanta.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Aug 16;19(11):1242-1251. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7694.
6
Race and ethnicity and self-reported racial/ethnic discrimination in breast cancer patient interactions with providers in the Pathways Study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;209(2):355-366. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07499-0. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
7
Assessing Perceived Discrimination as Reported by Black and White Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jun;8(3):589-595. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00817-4. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Racial-Ethnic Comparison of Guideline-Adherent Gynecologic Cancer Care in an Equal-Access System.
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;137(4):629-640. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004325.
10
Disparities in mortality-to-incidence ratios by race/ethnicity for female breast cancer in New York City, 2002-2016.
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):8226-8234. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3309. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

2
Impact of Structural Racism and Social Determinants of Health on Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality.
Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 2;84(23):3924-3935. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-1359.
3
Associations Between Perceived Discrimination, Screening Mammography, and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Prospective Cohort Analysis.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8012-8020. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15757-0. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
4
Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Oct 2;33(10):1286-1297. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0360.
6
Addressing disparities in European cancer outcomes: a qualitative study Protocol of the BEACON project.
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1252832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252832. eCollection 2024.
7
Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk among Older Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Breast Cancer Survivors.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jan 9;33(1):126-135. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0679.
8
Evaluation of disparities in perceived healthcare discrimination among -positive women from medically underserved populations.
Women Health. 2023 Aug 9;63(7):539-550. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2023.2237610. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
9
The Relationship between Therapeutic Alliance and Quality of Care in Patients with Advanced Cancer in Spain.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 24;30(4):3580-3589. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040273.
10
Challenges Experienced by Black Women with Breast Cancer During Active Treatment: Relationship to Treatment Adherence.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Feb;11(1):516-527. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01537-1. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of Self-reported Treatment Data by Patients With Breast Cancer Compared With Medical Record Data.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Jun;18(3):234-238. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.
3
Perceived Discrimination and Privilege in Health Care: The Role of Socioeconomic Status and Race.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1S1):S86-S94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.024.
5
Factors Affecting Quality of Life for Korean American Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 May 1;43(3):E132-42. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.E132-E142.
6
Latino Immigrants, Acculturation, and Health: Promising New Directions in Research.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:219-36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021545. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):31-42. doi: 10.3322/caac.21320. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
8
Racial disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by hormone receptor and HER2 status.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Nov;24(11):1666-72. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0293. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
10
Intersection of Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status in Mortality After Breast Cancer.
J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1287-99. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0052-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验