• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决欧洲癌症治疗结果的差异:一项定性研究——BEACON项目方案

Addressing disparities in European cancer outcomes: a qualitative study Protocol of the BEACON project.

作者信息

Ferraris Giulia, Coppini Veronica, Monzani Dario, Grasso Roberto, Kirac Iva, Horgan Denis, Pietrobon Ricardo, Galvão Victor, Pravettoni Gabriella

机构信息

Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement (SPPEFF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1252832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252832. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252832
PMID:38469221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10925749/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health disparities represent a crucial factor in cancer survival rates, awareness, quality of life, and mental health of people receiving a cancer diagnosis and their families. Income, education, geographic location, and ethnicity are some of the most important underlying reasons for health disparities in cancer across Europe. Costs of healthcare, access to information, psycho-oncological support options, integration of cancer research and innovative care, and multidisciplinary cancer teams are the main target areas when it comes to addressing disparities in the cancer context. As part of the Beacon Project (BEACON), we developed a protocol for a qualitative study to explore and identify any relevant reasons for cancer inequalities and disparities in Europe.

METHODS

Our four stakeholders namely, cancer patients, healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers will be recruited online, facilitated by collaborative efforts with cancer organizations from various European countries, including but not limited to Italy, Croatia, Estonia, and Slovenia. Qualitative online focus group discussions for each stakeholder will be conducted and transcribed. Subsequently, thematic analysis will be used to identify reasons and aspects that may contribute to the existing disparities in cancer outcomes at various levels of engagement and from different stakeholders' perspectives. Results from focus groups will inform a subsequent Delphi study and a SWOT analysis methodology.

DISCUSSION

Although advances in medical research, cancer screening and treatment options are constantly progressing, disparities in access to and awareness of healthcare in cancer patients are even more noticeable. Thus, mapping the capacity and capability of cancer centres in the European Union, creating decision support tools that will assist the four stakeholders' information needs and improving the quality of European cancer centres will be the main objectives of the BEACON project. The current protocol will outline the methodological and practical procedures to conduct online focus group discussions with different stakeholders.

摘要

引言

健康差异是影响癌症生存率、认知度、生活质量以及癌症确诊患者及其家属心理健康的关键因素。收入、教育程度、地理位置和种族是欧洲癌症健康差异的一些最重要的潜在原因。医疗保健成本、信息获取、心理肿瘤学支持选项、癌症研究与创新护理的整合以及多学科癌症团队是解决癌症领域差异的主要目标领域。作为灯塔项目(BEACON)的一部分,我们制定了一项定性研究方案,以探索和确定欧洲癌症不平等和差异的任何相关原因。

方法

我们的四个利益相关者,即癌症患者、医疗保健提供者、研究人员和政策制定者,将通过与来自包括但不限于意大利、克罗地亚、爱沙尼亚和斯洛文尼亚等不同欧洲国家的癌症组织合作,在网上招募。将针对每个利益相关者进行定性在线焦点小组讨论并进行转录。随后,将使用主题分析来确定在不同参与层面和从不同利益相关者角度可能导致癌症结果现有差异的原因和方面。焦点小组的结果将为后续的德尔菲研究和SWOT分析方法提供信息。

讨论

尽管医学研究、癌症筛查和治疗选择不断取得进展,但癌症患者在医疗保健获取和认知方面的差异更加明显。因此,绘制欧盟癌症中心的能力和实力、创建有助于满足四个利益相关者信息需求的决策支持工具以及提高欧洲癌症中心的质量将是灯塔项目的主要目标。当前方案将概述与不同利益相关者进行在线焦点小组讨论的方法和实际程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65e0/10925749/d2765e8dcf35/fpsyg-15-1252832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65e0/10925749/d2765e8dcf35/fpsyg-15-1252832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65e0/10925749/d2765e8dcf35/fpsyg-15-1252832-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing disparities in European cancer outcomes: a qualitative study Protocol of the BEACON project.解决欧洲癌症治疗结果的差异:一项定性研究——BEACON项目方案
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1252832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252832. eCollection 2024.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Understanding Reasons for Cancer Disparities in Italy: A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Needs of Cancer Patients and Healthcare Providers.了解意大利癌症差异的原因:癌症患者和医疗保健提供者障碍和需求的定性研究。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241258589. doi: 10.1177/10732748241258589.
4
Anniversary Oncology Days in Paris.巴黎周年肿瘤日。
Exp Oncol. 2023 Dec 28;45(3):273-274.
5
Patients' perspectives on cancer care disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: experiencing taboos, misinformation and barriers in the healthcare system.中东欧国家患者对癌症护理差异的看法:在医疗系统中遭遇禁忌、错误信息和障碍
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 9;14:1420178. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1420178. eCollection 2024.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
8
Disparities and barriers in the assessment of psychological distress, access to and use of psycho-oncological support in Europe: current perspectives.欧洲心理困扰评估、心理肿瘤学支持的获取与使用方面的差异和障碍:当前观点
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1252843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252843. eCollection 2023.
9
10
Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma.利益相关者参与针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔哮喘患者的八项比较疗效试验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 24;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00399-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project.消除欧洲医疗体系中的不平等现象:BEACON项目。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 5;13:1520772. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1520772. eCollection 2025.
2
Cancer burden in Europe: a systematic analysis of the GLOBOCAN database (2022).欧洲的癌症负担:对全球癌症数据库(2022年)的系统分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13862-1.
3
Patients' perspectives on cancer care disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: experiencing taboos, misinformation and barriers in the healthcare system.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to and facilitators of online health information-seeking behaviours among cancer patients: A systematic review.癌症患者在线寻求健康信息行为的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 15;9:20552076231210663. doi: 10.1177/20552076231210663. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality between and within countries in Europe: a population-based study.欧洲国家间及国家内部癌症死亡率的社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Nov 28;25:100551. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100551. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
A ten-year (2009-2018) database of cancer mortality rates in Italy.
中东欧国家患者对癌症护理差异的看法:在医疗系统中遭遇禁忌、错误信息和障碍
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 9;14:1420178. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1420178. eCollection 2024.
4
Understanding Reasons for Cancer Disparities in Italy: A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Needs of Cancer Patients and Healthcare Providers.了解意大利癌症差异的原因:癌症患者和医疗保健提供者障碍和需求的定性研究。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241258589. doi: 10.1177/10732748241258589.
意大利癌症死亡率十年(2009-2018 年)数据库。
Sci Data. 2022 Oct 21;9(1):638. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01729-0.
4
The European cancer burden in 2020: Incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers.2020 年欧洲癌症负担:40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的发病率和死亡率估计。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:308-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.039. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
5
European Reference Network for rare adult solid cancers, statement and integration to health care systems of member states: a position paper of the ERN EURACAN.欧洲罕见成人实体癌参考网络:声明及与成员国医疗保健系统的整合——ERN EURACAN立场文件
ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100174. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100174. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Co-Design for People-Centred Care Digital Solutions: A Literature Review.以患者为中心的护理数字解决方案的协同设计:文献综述
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 30;21(2):16. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5573.
7
Patient-clinician interactions and disparities in breast cancer care: the equality in breast cancer care study.患者-临床医生互动与乳腺癌护理差距:乳腺癌护理公平研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):968-980. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00820-7. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
8
Cancer mortality in Europe in 2015 and an overview of trends since 1990.2015 年欧洲癌症死亡率及自 1990 年以来的趋势概述。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1356-1369. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz179.
9
What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research.哪些因素会影响饱和度?焦点小组研究中的样本量估计。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
10
Effectiveness, acceptance and satisfaction of guided chat groups in psychosocial aftercare for outpatients with prostate cancer after prostatectomy.前列腺切除术后前列腺癌门诊患者心理社会后续护理中引导式聊天小组的有效性、接受度和满意度
Internet Interv. 2017 Jun 15;9:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.06.001. eCollection 2017 Sep.