• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察青少年前期和青少年基于优势教养方式及主观幸福感随时间的变化

Observing Change Over Time in Strength-Based Parenting and Subjective Wellbeing for Pre-teens and Teens.

作者信息

Waters Lea, Loton Daniel J, Grace Dawson, Jacques-Hamilton Rowan, Zyphur Michael J

机构信息

Centre for Positive Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of Management and Marketing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 10;10:2273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02273. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02273
PMID:31649593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6795758/
Abstract

The focus of this study was on adolescent mental health. More specifically, the relationship between strength-based parenting (SBP) and subjective wellbeing (SWB) during adolescence was examined at three time points over 14 months ( = 202, = 12.97, = 0.91, 48% female). SBP was positively related to life satisfaction and positive affect at each of the three time points, and was negatively related to negative affect. SBP and SWB both declined significantly over time. When examining the causal relationships between SBP and SWB, two different statistical models were applied: latent growth-curve models (LGM) and random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM). The LGM revealed a strong positive relationship between changes in SBP and SWB. Specifically, this model showed that SBP at one time point predicted adolescent SWB at future time points. However, when the more stringent statistical test was completed through RI-CLPMs, no cross-lagged paths reached significance. Thus, while parenting is a significant predictor of wellbeing for pre-teens and teens in real time, it is not predictive of wellbeing at future time points. Parents, thus, cannot assume that their current levels of SBP are 'banked' by their children to support future wellbeing. Instead, SBP needs to be an ongoing, contemporary parenting practice. Furthermore, the fact that perceptions of SBP decline in this age bracket suggest that SBP interventions may be helpful in supporting adolescent mental health.

摘要

本研究的重点是青少年心理健康。更具体地说,在14个月内的三个时间点考察了基于优势的养育方式(SBP)与青少年主观幸福感(SWB)之间的关系(n = 202,M = 12.97,SD = 0.91,48%为女性)。在三个时间点的每一个上,SBP与生活满意度和积极情绪呈正相关,与消极情绪呈负相关。SBP和SWB均随时间显著下降。在考察SBP与SWB之间的因果关系时,应用了两种不同的统计模型:潜在增长曲线模型(LGM)和随机截距交叉滞后面板模型(RI-CLPM)。LGM揭示了SBP变化与SWB之间存在很强的正相关关系。具体而言,该模型表明一个时间点的SBP能够预测未来时间点的青少年SWB。然而,当通过RI-CLPM完成更严格的统计检验时,没有交叉滞后路径达到显著水平。因此,虽然养育方式在当下是儿童和青少年幸福感的重要预测指标,但它并不能预测未来时间点的幸福感。因此,父母不能认为他们当前的SBP水平会被孩子“储存”起来以支持未来的幸福感。相反,SBP需要成为一种持续的、与时俱进的养育方式。此外,在这个年龄段对SBP的认知下降这一事实表明,SBP干预可能有助于支持青少年心理健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/12f60c7adf86/fpsyg-10-02273-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/79511be2894d/fpsyg-10-02273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/a51bfbafe229/fpsyg-10-02273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/12f60c7adf86/fpsyg-10-02273-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/79511be2894d/fpsyg-10-02273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/a51bfbafe229/fpsyg-10-02273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/6795758/12f60c7adf86/fpsyg-10-02273-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Observing Change Over Time in Strength-Based Parenting and Subjective Wellbeing for Pre-teens and Teens.观察青少年前期和青少年基于优势教养方式及主观幸福感随时间的变化
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 10;10:2273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02273. eCollection 2019.
2
The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy in the Connections between Strength-Based Parenting, Happiness and Psychological Distress in Teens.自我效能感在基于优势的养育方式、青少年幸福感与心理困扰之间关系中的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 10;8:1707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01707. eCollection 2017.
3
Evaluating the Structure of Subjective Well-Being: Evidence From Three Large-Scale, Long-Term, National Longitudinal Studies.评估主观幸福感的结构:来自三项大规模、长期全国纵向研究的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Mar 4:1461672241233433. doi: 10.1177/01461672241233433.
4
From Strength-Based Parenting to Subjective Well-Being of College Students: A Chain Mediating Role of Personal Growth Initiative and Strengths Use.从基于优势的养育方式到大学生的主观幸福感:个人成长主动性和优势利用的链式中介作用。
Psychol Rep. 2025 Aug;128(4):2353-2376. doi: 10.1177/00332941231181656. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
5
Comparing findings from the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and the monozygotic twin difference cross-lagged panel model: Maladaptive parenting and offspring emotional and behavioural problems.比较随机截距交叉滞后面板模型和同卵双胞胎差异交叉滞后面板模型的研究结果:适应不良的养育方式与后代的情绪和行为问题。
JCPP Adv. 2023 Oct 28;4(1):e12203. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12203. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Re-examining the reciprocal effects model of self-concept, self-efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel frameworks.重新审视自我概念、自我效能与学业成就的互逆效应模型:跨时滞面板与随机截距跨时滞面板框架的比较。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Mar;90(1):77-91. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12265. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
Subjective wellbeing of autistic adolescents and young adults: A cross sectional study.自闭症青少年和成年人的主观幸福感:一项横断面研究。
Autism Res. 2024 Jun;17(6):1175-1186. doi: 10.1002/aur.3139. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
8
Self-concept Clarity and Subjective Well-Being: Disentangling Within- and Between-Person Associations.自我概念清晰度与主观幸福感:剖析个体内与个体间的关联
J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(4):1439-1461. doi: 10.1007/s10902-023-00646-2. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
Subjective well-being, hope, and needs of individuals with serious mental illness.严重精神疾病患者的主观幸福感、希望和需求。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Apr 30;196(2-3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.10.012. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
10
Using path analysis to investigate the relationships between standardized instruments that measure health-related quality of life, capability wellbeing and subjective wellbeing: An application in the context of spinal cord injury.采用路径分析方法研究测量健康相关生活质量、能力幸福感和主观幸福感的标准化工具之间的关系:在脊髓损伤背景下的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Parenting styles and preschool children's development: from network analysis perspective.养育方式与学龄前儿童发展:基于网络分析视角
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1624317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1624317. eCollection 2025.
2
"It doesn't feel easy at all": Stressors and Supports of Parenting Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents in the US Southeast.“这感觉一点都不容易”:美国东南部养育性少数和性别少数青少年过程中的压力源与支持因素
LGBTQ Fam. 2025;21(3):201-222. doi: 10.1080/27703371.2024.2395902. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Children's executive functioning and health behaviors across pediatric life stages and ecological contexts.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and sensitivity to change of the Family Life Questionnaire in a clinical population.临床人群中家庭生活问卷的信度及对变化的敏感性
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2012 May;17(2):121-125. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00621.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
2
Advances in subjective well-being research.主观幸福感研究进展。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;2(4):253-260. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of becoming parents on the couple relationship.为人父母对夫妻关系影响的系统评价与元综合分析
儿童在儿科生命阶段和生态环境中的执行功能与健康行为。
J Behav Med. 2025 Apr;48(2):230-250. doi: 10.1007/s10865-024-00543-w. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Strength-Based Parenting Scale in an Adolescent Sample.基于优势的养育量表波斯语版本在青少年样本中的心理测量学特性。
Brain Behav. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70213. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70213.
5
Parenting Practices and Psychosomatic Complaints Among Swedish Adolescents.瑞典青少年的养育实践与身心症状抱怨。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;68:1606580. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606580. eCollection 2023.
6
Raising Children in Risk Neighborhoods from Chile: Examining the Relationship between Parenting Stress and Parental Adjustment.智利高危社区的儿童养育问题:考察育儿压力与父母适应之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):45. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010045.
Midwifery. 2018 Jun;61:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Cumulative effects of negative life events and family stress on children's mental health: the Bergen Child Study.消极生活事件和家庭压力对儿童心理健康的累积影响:卑尔根儿童研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1451-4. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy in the Connections between Strength-Based Parenting, Happiness and Psychological Distress in Teens.自我效能感在基于优势的养育方式、青少年幸福感与心理困扰之间关系中的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 10;8:1707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01707. eCollection 2017.
6
Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing.我们的未来:《柳叶刀》青少年健康与福祉委员会
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. Epub 2016 May 9.
7
Emotional Inertia is Associated with Lower Well-Being when Controlling for Differences in Emotional Context.在控制情绪背景差异时,情绪惯性与较低的幸福感相关。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 8;6:1997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01997. eCollection 2015.
8
Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.越多就一定越好吗?验证性因素分析中每个因素的指标数量。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1998 Apr 1;33(2):181-220. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1.
9
A critique of the cross-lagged panel model.对交叉滞后面板模型的批判。
Psychol Methods. 2015 Mar;20(1):102-16. doi: 10.1037/a0038889.
10
Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents.年度研究综述:儿童和青少年精神障碍全球患病率的荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):345-65. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12381. Epub 2015 Feb 3.