• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种利用超高维大数据的力量对随机对照试验中的治疗效果进行的检验。

A test for treatment effects in randomized controlled trials, harnessing the power of ultrahigh dimensional big data.

作者信息

Lee Wen-Chung, Lin Jui-Hsiang

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17630. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017630.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000017630
PMID:31651877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6824789/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold-standard research design in biomedicine. However, practical concerns often limit the sample size, n, the number of patients in a RCT. We aim to show that the power of a RCT can be increased by increasing p, the number of baseline covariates (sex, age, socio-demographic, genomic, and clinical profiles et al, of the patients) collected in the RCT (referred to as the 'dimension').

METHODS

The conventional test for treatment effects is based on testing the 'crude null' that the outcomes of the subjects are of no difference between the two arms of a RCT. We propose a 'high-dimensional test' which is based on testing the 'sharp null' that the experimental intervention has no treatment effect whatsoever, for patients of any covariate profile.

RESULTS

Using computer simulations, we show that the high-dimensional test can become very powerful in detecting treatment effects for very large p, but not so for small or moderate p. Using a real dataset, we demonstrate that the P value of the high-dimensional test decreases as the number of baseline covariates increases, though it is still not significant.

CONCLUSION

In this big-data era, pushing p of a RCT to the millions, billions, or even trillions may someday become feasible. And the high-dimensional test proposed in this study can become very powerful in detecting treatment effects.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验(RCT)是生物医学中的金标准研究设计。然而,实际问题常常限制样本量n,即RCT中的患者数量。我们旨在表明,通过增加p,即RCT中收集的基线协变量(患者的性别、年龄、社会人口统计学、基因组和临床特征等)的数量(称为“维度”),可以提高RCT的检验效能。

方法

传统的治疗效果检验基于检验“粗略无效假设”,即RCT两组中受试者的结局无差异。我们提出一种“高维检验”,它基于检验“精确无效假设”,即对于任何协变量特征的患者,实验性干预都没有任何治疗效果。

结果

通过计算机模拟,我们表明高维检验在p非常大时检测治疗效果的能力会变得很强,但在p较小或中等时并非如此。使用真实数据集,我们证明高维检验P值会随着基线协变量数量的增加而降低,尽管仍然不显著。

结论

在这个大数据时代,将RCT的p值推至数百万、数十亿甚至数万亿,也许有朝一日会变得可行。并且本研究中提出的高维检验在检测治疗效果方面会变得非常强大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/a85056ff6c10/medi-98-e17630-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/8ec409da8182/medi-98-e17630-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/4c5f2309e7d9/medi-98-e17630-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/a85056ff6c10/medi-98-e17630-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/8ec409da8182/medi-98-e17630-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/4c5f2309e7d9/medi-98-e17630-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d78/6824789/a85056ff6c10/medi-98-e17630-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
A test for treatment effects in randomized controlled trials, harnessing the power of ultrahigh dimensional big data.一种利用超高维大数据的力量对随机对照试验中的治疗效果进行的检验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17630. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017630.
2
Improving precision and power in randomized trials with a two-stage study design: Stratification using clustering method.
Pharm Stat. 2023 Mar;22(2):396-407. doi: 10.1002/pst.2279. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
3
Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes.多主要结局随机对照试验分析和样本量计算中多重比较的调整方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0754-4.
4
SECRETS: Subject-efficient clinical randomized controlled trials using synthetic intervention.秘诀:使用合成干预的以受试者为中心的临床随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 3;38:101265. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101265. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.适用于具有连续结局的部分嵌套随机对照试验的适当统计方法:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0559-x.
6
Large-scale, pragmatic randomized trials in the era of big data, precision medicine and machine learning. Valid and necessary, or outdated and a waste of resources?大数据、精准医学和机器学习时代的大规模实用随机试验。是有效且必要的,还是过时且浪费资源的?
Injury. 2023 May;54 Suppl 3:S2-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.016. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.在可能预期治疗效果存在非比例风险的临床试验设计中增强对数秩检验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 11;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x.
8
Estimation of treatment effects in matched-pair cluster randomized trials by calibrating covariate imbalance between clusters.通过校准聚类间的协变量不平衡来估计配对聚类随机试验中的治疗效果。
Biometrics. 2014 Dec;70(4):1014-22. doi: 10.1111/biom.12214. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
Assessment and implication of prognostic imbalance in randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome--a simulation study.二分类结局随机对照试验中预后不均衡的评估及意义——一项模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036677. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
An approach to trial design and analysis in the era of non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect.治疗效果非比例风险时代的试验设计与分析方法。
Trials. 2014 Aug 7;15:314. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-314.

引用本文的文献

1
Health outcome prediction using multiple perturbations.使用多种扰动进行健康结果预测。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18664. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018664.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevention of Nosocomial Infections in Critically Ill Patients With Lactoferrin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.乳铁蛋白预防危重症患者医院感染的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1450-1456. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003294.
2
From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities.从大数据分析到全民个性化医疗:挑战与机遇
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Jun 27;8:33. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0108-y.
3
Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system.
医学中的大数据与新知识:学习型健康系统所需的思维、培训及工具
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1163-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053.
4
Detecting a weak association by testing its multiple perturbations: a data mining approach.通过测试其多种扰动来检测弱关联:一种数据挖掘方法。
Sci Rep. 2014 May 28;4:5081. doi: 10.1038/srep05081.
5
Detecting and correcting the bias of unmeasured factors using perturbation analysis: a data-mining approach.使用微扰分析检测和纠正未测量因素的偏差:一种数据挖掘方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 5;14:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-18.
6
The inevitable application of big data to health care.大数据在医疗保健领域的必然应用。
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1351-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.393.
7
Matrix variate logistic regression model with application to EEG data.矩阵变量逻辑回归模型及其在 EEG 数据中的应用。
Biostatistics. 2013 Jan;14(1):189-202. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs023. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
8
How does multiple testing correction work?多重检验校正如何工作?
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Dec;27(12):1135-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt1209-1135.
9
Bounds on causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance under monotonicity assumptions about covariates.在满足协变量单调假设下,对于不依从的随机试验,因果效应的界。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 20;28(26):3249-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.3724.
10
Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials.临床研究方法学I:随机试验介绍
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.10.003.