• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

秘诀:使用合成干预的以受试者为中心的临床随机对照试验。

SECRETS: Subject-efficient clinical randomized controlled trials using synthetic intervention.

作者信息

Lala Sayeri, Jha Niraj K

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, 08544, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 3;38:101265. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101265. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101265
PMID:38352896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10862504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) is commonly used in Phase-3 clinical trials to establish treatment effectiveness but requires hundreds-to-thousands of subjects, making it difficult to implement, which leads to high Phase-3 trial failure rates. One approach to increasing power of a trial is to augment data collected from an RCT with external data from prospective studies or prior RCTs. However, this requires that external data be comparable to data from the study of interest, a condition that does not hold for new interventions or populations being studied. Another approach is to lower sample size requirements by using the cross-over design, which measures individual treatment effects (ITEs) to remove inter-subject variability; however, this design is only suitable for chronic conditions and interventions with effects that wash out rapidly.

METHOD

We propose a novel and practical framework called SECRETS (Subject-Efficient Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials using Synthetic Intervention) to increase power of any parallel-group RCT by simulating the cross-over design using only data collected from the study. SECRETS first estimates ITEs across all subjects recruited to the RCT by using a state-of-the-art counterfactual estimation algorithm called synthetic intervention (SI). Since SI induces dependencies among the ITEs, we introduce a novel hypothesis testing strategy to test for treatment effectiveness.

RESULTS

We show that SECRETS can increase the power of an RCT while maintaining comparable significance levels; in particular, on three real-world clinical RCTs (Phase-3 trials), SECRETS increases power over the baseline method by % (average: 21.5%, standard deviation: 15.8%), thereby reducing the number of subjects needed to obtain a typically desired statistical operating point of 80% power and 5% significance level by % (10-3,957 fewer subjects per arm). Our analyses show that SECRETS increases power by consistently reducing the variance of the average treatment effect, thereby mimicking the effects of a cross-over design.

CONCLUSION

SECRETS increases subject efficiency of an RCT by simulating the cross-over design using only data collected from the RCT; therefore, it is a feasible solution for increasing the trial's power, especially under settings where satisfying sample size requirements is difficult.

摘要

背景

平行组随机对照试验(RCT)常用于三期临床试验以确定治疗效果,但需要数百至数千名受试者,实施起来较为困难,这导致三期试验失败率很高。提高试验效能的一种方法是用前瞻性研究或既往RCT的外部数据补充从RCT收集的数据。然而,这要求外部数据与感兴趣研究的数据具有可比性,对于新的干预措施或正在研究的人群,这一条件并不成立。另一种方法是采用交叉设计来降低样本量要求,该设计测量个体治疗效果(ITE)以消除受试者间的变异性;然而,这种设计仅适用于慢性疾病和效果迅速消失的干预措施。

方法

我们提出了一种新颖实用的框架,称为SECRETS(使用合成干预的高效受试者临床随机对照试验),通过仅使用从研究中收集的数据模拟交叉设计来提高任何平行组RCT的效能。SECRETS首先使用一种称为合成干预(SI)的先进反事实估计算法估计招募到RCT的所有受试者的ITE。由于SI会在ITE之间引发相关性,我们引入了一种新颖的假设检验策略来检验治疗效果。

结果

我们表明,SECRETS可以提高RCT的效能,同时保持可比的显著性水平;特别是在三项真实世界的临床RCT(三期试验)中,SECRETS比基线方法将效能提高了%(平均:21.5%,标准差:15.8%),从而将获得通常期望的80%效能和5%显著性水平的统计操作点所需的受试者数量减少了%(每臂减少10 - 3957名受试者)。我们的分析表明,SECRETS通过持续降低平均治疗效果的方差来提高效能,从而模拟交叉设计的效果。

结论

SECRETS通过仅使用从RCT收集的数据模拟交叉设计来提高RCT的受试者效率;因此,它是提高试验效能的可行解决方案,尤其是在难以满足样本量要求的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/1c2b6b535f19/fx1011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/872c9b78ba3a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/68bcc88e4a81/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/82209012f60b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/70d033e55c8d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/158cb63b25dd/fx1003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/d2eb4ba5997b/fx1004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/6c8f251ff736/fx1009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/1c2b6b535f19/fx1011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/872c9b78ba3a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/68bcc88e4a81/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/82209012f60b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/70d033e55c8d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/158cb63b25dd/fx1003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/d2eb4ba5997b/fx1004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/6c8f251ff736/fx1009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ac/10862504/1c2b6b535f19/fx1011.jpg

相似文献

1
SECRETS: Subject-efficient clinical randomized controlled trials using synthetic intervention.秘诀:使用合成干预的以受试者为中心的临床随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 3;38:101265. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101265. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
5
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
6
Epidemiology Of Study Design研究设计的流行病学
7
8
The "RCT augmentation": a novel simulation method to add patient heterogeneity into phase III trials.“RCT 增强”:一种将患者异质性加入 III 期临床试验的新模拟方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0534-6.
9
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.放疗或放射外科手术后脑放射性坏死的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011492. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011492.pub2.
10

引用本文的文献

1
TAD-SIE: sample size estimation for clinical randomized controlled trials using a Trend-Adaptive Design with a Synthetic-Intervention-Based Estimator.TAD-SIE:使用基于合成干预估计器的趋势自适应设计进行临床随机对照试验的样本量估计。
Trials. 2025 Jan 29;26(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08661-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliable, cheap, fast and few: What is the best study for assessing medical practices? Randomized controlled trials or synthetic control arms?可靠、廉价、快速且样本量小:评估医疗实践的最佳研究是什么?随机对照试验还是合成对照臂?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Aug;51(8):e13580. doi: 10.1111/eci.13580. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
2
From Real-World Patient Data to Individualized Treatment Effects Using Machine Learning: Current and Future Methods to Address Underlying Challenges.从真实世界的患者数据到使用机器学习实现个体化治疗效果:解决潜在挑战的当前和未来方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;109(1):87-100. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1907. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
3
Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials - A Primer for Researchers.
临床试验中的合成对照与外部对照——研究人员入门指南
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May 8;12:457-467. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S242097. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies.使用模拟研究比较汇总的单病例试验与平行和交叉随机对照试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;7(4):137. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040137.
5
Reporting of Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 Statement.多臂平行组随机试验报告:CONSORT 2010 声明的扩展。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1610-1620. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3087.
6
Minimizing Patient Burden Through the Use of Historical Subject-Level Data in Innovative Confirmatory Clinical Trials: Review of Methods and Opportunities.在创新性确证性临床试验中利用历史受试者水平数据减轻患者负担:方法与机遇综述
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):546-559. doi: 10.1177/2168479018778282. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
How much do clinical trials cost?临床试验的成本是多少?
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Jun;16(6):381-382. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.70. Epub 2017 May 19.
8
Trial of Amitriptyline, Topiramate, and Placebo for Pediatric Migraine.阿米替林、托吡酯和安慰剂治疗儿童偏头痛的试验。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 12;376(2):115-124. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610384. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
9
Failure of Investigational Drugs in Late-Stage Clinical Development and Publication of Trial Results.在临床开发后期失败的试验药物和试验结果的发表。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1826-1833. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6008.
10
Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis.重症肌无力胸腺切除术的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):511-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602489.