Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitative Medicine, Medical University Greifswald, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, BG Hospital Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin gGmbH, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 25;14(10):e0224370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224370. eCollection 2019.
Although shoulder girdle injuries are frequent, those of the medial part are widely unexplored. Our aim is to improve the knowledge of this rare injury and its management in Germany by big data analysis.
The data are based on ICD-10 codes of all German hospitals as provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Based on the ICD-10 codes S42.01 (medial clavicle fracture, MCF) and S43.2 (sternoclavicular joint dislocation, SCJD), anonymized patient data from 2012 to 2014 were evaluated retrospectively for epidemiologic issues. We analyzed especially the concomitant injuries and therapy strategies.
A total of 114,003 cases with a clavicle involving shoulder girdle injury were identified with 12.5% of medial clavicle injuries (MCI). These were accompanied by concomitant injuries, most of which were thoracic and craniocerebral injuries as well as injuries at the shoulder/upper arm. A significant difference between MCF and SCJD concerning concomitant injuries only appears for head injuries (p = 0.003). If MCI is the main diagnosis, soft tissue injuries typically occur as secondary diagnoses. The MCI are significantly more often associated with concomitant injuries (p < 0.001) for almost each anatomic region compared with lateral clavicle injuries (LCI). The main differences were found for thoracic and upper extremity injuries. Different treatment strategies were used, most frequently plate osteosynthesis in more than 50% of MCF cases. Surgery on SCJD was performed with K-wires, tension flange or absorbable materials, fewer by plate osteosynthesis.
We proved that MCI are rare injuries, which might be why they are treated by inhomogeneous treatment strategies. No standard procedure has yet been established. MCI can occur in cases of severely injured patients, often associated with severe thoracic or other concomitant injuries. Therefore, MCI appear to be more complex than LCI. Further studies are required regarding the development of standard treatment strategy and representative clinical studies.
尽管肩部损伤很常见,但对内侧部分的损伤却知之甚少。我们的目的是通过大数据分析,提高德国对这种罕见损伤及其治疗方法的认识。
数据基于德国联邦统计局提供的所有德国医院的 ICD-10 代码。基于 ICD-10 代码 S42.01(内侧锁骨骨折,MCF)和 S43.2(胸锁关节脱位,SCJD),我们回顾性地评估了 2012 年至 2014 年匿名患者数据,以了解流行病学问题。我们特别分析了伴随损伤和治疗策略。
共确定了 114003 例涉及锁骨的肩部损伤病例,其中 12.5%为内侧锁骨损伤(MCI)。这些损伤伴有伴随损伤,其中大部分是胸部和颅脑损伤以及肩部/上臂损伤。MCF 和 SCJD 之间仅在颅脑损伤方面存在伴随损伤的显著差异(p = 0.003)。如果 MCI 是主要诊断,软组织损伤通常作为次要诊断出现。与外侧锁骨损伤(LCI)相比,MCI 与几乎每个解剖区域的伴随损伤明显更相关(p < 0.001)。主要差异出现在胸部和上肢损伤方面。使用了不同的治疗策略,超过 50%的 MCF 病例主要采用钢板内固定,而 LCI 则较少采用。SCJD 的手术主要采用克氏针、张力翼或可吸收材料,较少采用钢板内固定。
我们证明 MCI 是罕见的损伤,这可能是导致其治疗方法不统一的原因。目前尚未建立标准的治疗程序。MCI 可能发生在受伤严重的患者中,常伴有严重的胸部或其他伴随损伤。因此,MCI 比 LCI 更复杂。需要进一步研究制定标准治疗策略和代表性临床研究。