• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慈善食品援助项目中食品控制的证据:系统范围界定综述。

Evidence on food control in charitable food assistance programs: a systematic scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 25;8(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1164-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-019-1164-8
PMID:31653271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6813981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food control is defined as a mandatory regulatory activity of enforcement aimed at ensuring that all foods during production, handling, storage, processing, and distribution are safe, wholesome, and fit for human consumption; conform to safety and quality requirements; and are honestly and accurately labeled as prescribed by law. This applies to food served by the conventional food supply chain as well as the charitable food assistance programs (CFAPs). This review sought to map the available evidence on the food control in the CFAPs globally.

METHODS

In order to identify the literature, we developed a series of search terms, as well as parameters for including articles to review the literature using African Index Medicus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and EBSCOhost (MEDLINE with full text, Academic search complete, MEDLINE) search engines. Articles were also searched through the "Cited by" search as well as citations included in the reference lists of included articles. We included studies reported in all languages and published from inception to 2018. We included studies if they presented evidence of the CFAPs, namely food banks, food charitable organizations (FCOs), pantries, community soup kitchens, and emergency shelters. We presented the results of our search using thematic analysis in order to reveal the emerging themes.

RESULTS

Beyond inconsistencies with the classification of the CFAPs, our study found significant knowledge gaps in crucial areas, namely food vulnerability, food traceability, vulnerability of beneficiary populations, and lack of food control. Our search yielded a total of 23 articles, which we included in the analysis. Results show that while food is the critical commodity to saving lives, if not controlled properly, it can have an adverse effect, especially on people it is meant to benefit (the vulnerable).

CONCLUSION

With no previous comprehensive review to assess what is known about food control in the CFAPs, we undertook a scoping review, focusing on mapping the key concepts, including the main sources and types of evidence available. By drawing conclusions about the overall state of research activity and identifying research gaps and priorities in the existing literature, this study provides a baseline assessment of the CFAP research published in peer-reviewed journals from inception to 2018.

摘要

背景

食品控制是指一项强制性的监管活动,旨在确保生产、处理、储存、加工和分销过程中的所有食品都是安全、卫生且适合人类食用的;符合安全和质量要求;并按照法律规定如实准确地标注。这适用于传统食品供应链供应的食品以及慈善食品援助计划(CFAP)。本综述旨在绘制全球 CFAP 食品控制的现有证据图谱。

方法

为了确定文献,我们开发了一系列搜索词,并制定了纳入文章的参数,以便使用非洲医学索引、PubMed、Google Scholar 和 EBSCOhost(带有全文的 MEDLINE、学术搜索完整版、MEDLINE)搜索引擎对文献进行综述。还通过“被引”搜索以及纳入文章的参考文献列表中的引文对文章进行搜索。我们纳入了以所有语言发表的并从创建之初到 2018 年发表的研究。如果研究报告了 CFAP,即食品银行、食品慈善组织(FCO)、食品储藏室、社区汤厨房和紧急避难所,我们将其纳入研究。我们使用主题分析展示搜索结果,以揭示新兴主题。

结果

除了与 CFAP 分类不一致外,我们的研究还发现了在关键领域存在严重的知识差距,即食品脆弱性、食品可追溯性、受益人群脆弱性和食品控制不足。我们的搜索共产生了 23 篇文章,我们将其纳入分析。结果表明,虽然食品是拯救生命的关键商品,但如果控制不当,它可能会产生不利影响,尤其是对那些本应受益的弱势群体。

结论

由于之前没有全面的综述来评估 CFAP 中食品控制的情况,我们进行了范围综述,重点是绘制关键概念图,包括现有证据的主要来源和类型。通过总结研究活动的总体状态并确定现有文献中的研究差距和优先事项,本研究对 2018 年之前在同行评议期刊上发表的 CFAP 研究进行了基线评估。

相似文献

1
Evidence on food control in charitable food assistance programs: a systematic scoping review.慈善食品援助项目中食品控制的证据:系统范围界定综述。
Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 25;8(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1164-8.
2
Mapping evidence on charitable food assistance system's compliance with safety and general hygiene requirements in Africa and the rest of the world: a systematic scoping review protocol.绘制慈善食品援助系统在非洲和世界其他地区遵守安全和一般卫生要求的证据图:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0907-2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Mapping evidence of food safety at transport stations in Africa: a scoping review protocol.非洲交通站点食品安全证据图谱:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;10(8):e035879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035879.
7
Outcomes of disease prevention and management interventions in food pantries and food banks: protocol for a scoping review.食品分发处和食品银行疾病预防与管理干预措施的结果:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e018022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018022.
8
Policy approaches to nutrition-focused food banking in industrialized countries: a scoping review.工业化国家以营养为重点的食品银行政策方法:范围综述。
Nutr Rev. 2023 Sep 11;81(10):1373-1392. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad004.
9
Outcomes of disease prevention and management interventions in food pantries and food banks: a scoping review.食品储藏室和食品银行中疾病预防和管理干预措施的结果:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 21;9(8):e029236. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029236.
10
The Nutritional Quality of Food Provided from Food Pantries: A Systematic Review of Existing Literature.食品救济站提供的食品的营养质量:现有文献的系统综述
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):577-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Food handling practices and sanitary conditions of charitable food assistance programs in eThekwini District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省埃特科姆地区慈善食品援助项目的食品处理操作和卫生条件。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72359-2.
2
Food bank operations: review of operation research methods and challenges during COVID-19.食品银行运营:COVID-19 期间运营研究方法和挑战综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;23(1):1783. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16269-4.
3
Dietary risk of donated food at an Australian food bank: an audit protocol.澳大利亚一家食品银行捐赠食品的饮食风险:一项审计方案。
BMC Nutr. 2023 Jun 5;9(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00719-8.
4
Food handlers' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practices regarding safe food handling in charitable food assistance programmes in the eThekwini District, South Africa: cross-sectional study.南非埃滕哈赫区慈善食品援助项目中食品处理人员关于安全食品处理的知识、态度和自我报告做法:横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e065357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065357.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping evidence on charitable food assistance system's compliance with safety and general hygiene requirements in Africa and the rest of the world: a systematic scoping review protocol.绘制慈善食品援助系统在非洲和世界其他地区遵守安全和一般卫生要求的证据图:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0907-2.
2
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Ensuring food safety in food donations: Case study of the Belgian donation/acceptation chain.确保食品捐赠中的食品安全:以比利时捐赠/接受链为例。
Food Res Int. 2017 Oct;100(Pt 2):137-149. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.08.046. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
Risk Assessment in the Recovery of Food for Social Solidarity Purposes: Preliminary Data.用于社会团结目的的食品回收风险评估:初步数据。
Ital J Food Saf. 2016 Nov 15;5(4):6187. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.6187. eCollection 2016 Sep 20.
5
The right to food, food donation and microbiological problems of food safety: an experience in the territory of Florence.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(1):119-22. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_01_19.
6
HYGIENE PRACTICES IN URBAN RESTAURANTS AND CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTING FOOD SAFETY AND HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS (HACCP) PROGRAMMES IN THIKA TOWN, KENYA.肯尼亚锡卡镇城市餐厅的卫生习惯以及实施食品安全与危害分析关键控制点(HACCP)计划面临的挑战
East Afr Med J. 2012 Dec;89(12):390-8.
7
Staphylococcus aureus food poisoning among Bulawayo City Council employees, Zimbabwe, 2014.2014年津巴布韦布拉瓦约市议会员工中的金黄色葡萄球菌食物中毒事件。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 28;8:485. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1490-4.
8
Effectiveness of the food recovery at the retailing stage under shelf life uncertainty: An application to Italian food chains.保质期不确定情况下零售阶段食品回收的有效性:以意大利食品连锁店为例
Waste Manag. 2015 Jul;41:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Food safety practices among Norwegian consumers.挪威消费者的食品安全行为。
J Food Prot. 2013 Nov;76(11):1939-47. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-269.
10
An assessment of food safety needs of restaurants in Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.尼日利亚奥韦里州餐馆食品安全需求评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Aug 2;10(8):3296-309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10083296.