• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发喉切除术与挽救性喉切除术:放化疗时代结局的比较。

Primary Laryngectomy Versus Salvage Laryngectomy: A Comparison of Outcomes in the Chemoradiation Era.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2020 Sep;130(9):2179-2185. doi: 10.1002/lary.28343. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1002/lary.28343
PMID:31654445
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare primary total laryngectomy (TL) versus salvage TL and analyze the functional outcomes, complications, recurrence rates, and survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifteen-year retrospective analysis of 208 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated by TL was completed. Outcome measures included survival, swallowing rehabilitation, speech rehabilitation, complications, and assessment of comorbidity. Survival estimates were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method, and regression analysis utilized the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Alaryngeal speech was not significantly different between primary TL and salvage TL, 68% versus 82% (P = 0.14). Comparing primary and salvage TL, the perioperative complication rate was 33% versus 48% (P = 0.036). Thirty-six percent of primary TL patients had recurrence compared to 26% of salvage patients. Five-year overall survival rates between primary TL and salvage TL were not significantly different (P = 0.68). Comorbidity was an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of a functional voice was not significantly different between salvage and primary TL patients, with a majority achieving alaryngeal speech. Perioperative complications were more prevalent in the salvage TL group. Recurrence and survival are significantly associated with comorbidity status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:2179-2185, 2020.

摘要

目的

比较原发性全喉切除术(TL)与挽救性 TL,并分析功能结果、并发症、复发率和生存率。

研究设计

病例系列,回顾性图表分析。

设置

三级护理中心。

受试者和方法

完成了对 208 例接受 TL 治疗的喉鳞状细胞癌患者的 15 年回顾性分析。结果测量包括生存率、吞咽康复、言语康复、并发症和共病评估。生存估计采用 Kaplan-Meier 法分析,回归分析采用 Cox 比例风险模型。

结果

原发性 TL 和挽救性 TL 之间的无喉言语差异无统计学意义,分别为 68%和 82%(P=0.14)。比较原发性和挽救性 TL,围手术期并发症发生率分别为 33%和 48%(P=0.036)。原发性 TL 患者中有 36%出现复发,而挽救性 TL 患者中有 26%出现复发。原发性 TL 和挽救性 TL 之间 5 年总生存率无显著差异(P=0.68)。共病是生存的独立预测因素。

结论

挽救性 TL 和原发性 TL 患者之间功能性语音的发展没有显著差异,大多数患者都能实现无喉语音。挽救性 TL 组的围手术期并发症更为常见。复发和生存与共病状况显著相关。

证据水平

4 级喉镜,130:2179-2185,2020。

相似文献

1
Primary Laryngectomy Versus Salvage Laryngectomy: A Comparison of Outcomes in the Chemoradiation Era.原发喉切除术与挽救性喉切除术:放化疗时代结局的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Sep;130(9):2179-2185. doi: 10.1002/lary.28343. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
2
Oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage supracricoid partial laryngectomy.挽救性环状软骨上部分喉切除术的肿瘤学及功能学结果
Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Dec;138(12):1117-1122. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1506154. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Changing trends of speech outcomes after total laryngectomy in the 21st century: a single-center study.21世纪全喉切除术后言语结果的变化趋势:一项单中心研究。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov;124(11):2508-12. doi: 10.1002/lary.24717. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
4
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Primary and Salvage Total Laryngectomy.原发性和挽救性全喉切除术的肿瘤学及功能预后
Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):E569-E575. doi: 10.1002/lary.28955. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
5
Salvage laryngectomy in patients with recurrent laryngeal cancer in the setting of nonoperative treatment failure.挽救性喉切除术治疗非手术治疗失败后复发性喉癌患者。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Aug;149(2):245-51. doi: 10.1177/0194599813486257. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
Elucidation of salvage laryngectomy pathologic and clinical variables to guide further treatment intensification investigation.阐明挽救性喉切除术的病理和临床变量,以指导进一步的强化治疗研究。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):823-830. doi: 10.1002/lary.26782. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Total Laryngectomy Versus Larynx Preservation for T4a Larynx Cancer: Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes.T4a期喉癌的全喉切除术与喉保留术:治疗模式与生存结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 1;92(3):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.004.
8
Elective neck dissection for no neck during salvage total laryngectomy: findings, complications, and oncological outcome.挽救性全喉切除术后无颈部转移行择区性颈清扫术:结果、并发症和肿瘤学转归。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Aug 1;139(8):790-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3995.
9
Laryngeal recurrence sites in patients previously treated with transoral laser microsurgery for squamous cell carcinoma.经口激光微创手术治疗鳞状细胞癌后患者的喉部复发部位。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 13;47(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0266-y.
10
Predictors of Stricture and Swallowing Function Following Salvage Laryngectomy.挽救性喉切除术术后狭窄和吞咽功能的预测因素。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):1229-1234. doi: 10.1002/lary.29215. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival and larynx function after upfront vs. salvage total laryngectomy: a meta-analysis.upfront与挽救性全喉切除术术后的生存率及喉功能:一项荟萃分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09647-8.
2
Guidelines for the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer from the Korean Society of Head and Neck Surgery.韩国头颈外科学会喉癌治疗指南
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May;18(2):89-108. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2025.00009. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
3
Functional and quality-of-life outcomes following salvage surgery for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
挽救性手术治疗头颈部复发性鳞状细胞癌的功能和生活质量结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4597-4618. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08056-z. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Salvage vs. Primary Total Laryngectomy in Patients with Locally Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcomes and Their Predictive Factors.局部晚期喉癌或下咽癌患者挽救性手术与初次全喉切除术的疗效及预测因素分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 7;12(4):1305. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041305.
5
Pharyngocutaneous Fistula Following Primary and Salvage Laryngectomy: Aetiology and Predictive Factors.初次及挽救性喉切除术后咽皮瘘:病因及预测因素
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):2139-2148. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02046-x. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
6
Risk Factors for Functional Outcomes in Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.晚期喉鳞状细胞癌功能结局的危险因素。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Mar;133(3):594-600. doi: 10.1002/lary.30166. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Factors Associated with Outcomes Following Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Laryngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 50 Cases from a Single Center in Poland.波兰单中心 50 例回顾性研究:复发性喉癌挽救性手术后结局的相关因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Sep 18;27:e932004. doi: 10.12659/MSM.932004.
8
Preventing Biofilm Formation and Development on Ear, Nose and Throat Medical Devices.预防耳鼻喉科医疗器械上生物膜的形成与发展。
Biomedicines. 2021 Aug 16;9(8):1025. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9081025.
9
Functional Outcomes and Complications After Salvage Total Laryngectomy for Residual, Recurrent, and Second Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx and Hypopharynx: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.喉和下咽残余、复发及第二原发鳞状细胞癌挽救性全喉切除术后的功能结局与并发症:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 2;10:1390. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01390. eCollection 2020.
10
Rational surgical neck management in total laryngectomy for advanced stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas.在晚期喉鳞状细胞癌的全喉切除术中合理的颈段处理。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb;147(2):549-559. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03352-1. Epub 2020 Aug 18.