Suppr超能文献

全基因组关联研究在结构出生缺陷中的应用:综述与评论。

Genome-wide association studies of structural birth defects: A review and commentary.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1329-1342. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1606. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While there is strong evidence that genetic risk factors play an important role in the etiologies of structural birth defects, compared to other diseases, there have been relatively few genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of these conditions. We reviewed the current landscape of GWAS conducted for birth defects, noting novel insights, and future directions.

METHODS

This article reviews the literature with regard to GWAS of structural birth defects. Key defects included in this review include oral clefts, congenital heart defects (CHDs), biliary atresia, pyloric stenosis, hypospadias, craniosynostosis, and clubfoot. Additionally, other issues related to GWAS are considered, including the assessment of polygenic risk scores and issues related to genetic ancestry, as well as utilizing genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism array data to evaluate gene-environment interactions and Mendelian randomization.

RESULTS

For some birth defects, including oral clefts and CHDs, several novel susceptibility loci have been identified and replicated through GWAS, including 8q24 for oral clefts, DGKK for hypospadias, and 4p16 for CHDs. Relatively common birth defects for which there are currently no published GWAS include neural tube defects, anotia/microtia, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, gastroschisis, and omphalocele.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, GWAS have been successful in identifying several novel susceptibility genes and genomic regions for structural birth defects. These findings have provided new insights into the etiologies of these phenotypes. However, GWAS have been underutilized for understanding the genetic etiologies of several birth defects.

摘要

背景

虽然有强有力的证据表明遗传风险因素在结构出生缺陷的病因学中起着重要作用,但与其他疾病相比,针对这些疾病的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)相对较少。我们回顾了目前针对结构出生缺陷进行的 GWAS 的研究现状,指出了新的见解和未来的方向。

方法

本文综述了结构出生缺陷 GWAS 的文献,重点介绍了包括口腔裂、先天性心脏病(CHD)、胆道闭锁、幽门狭窄、尿道下裂、颅缝早闭和马蹄内翻足在内的关键缺陷。此外,还考虑了与 GWAS 相关的其他问题,包括多基因风险评分的评估以及与遗传祖先相关的问题,以及利用全基因组单核苷酸多态性阵列数据评估基因-环境相互作用和孟德尔随机化。

结果

对于一些出生缺陷,包括口腔裂和 CHD,已经通过 GWAS 确定并复制了几个新的易感基因座,包括口腔裂的 8q24、尿道下裂的 DGKK 和 CHD 的 4p16。目前尚无发表的 GWAS 的相对常见的出生缺陷包括神经管缺陷、无耳/小耳、无眼/小眼、腹裂和脐膨出。

结论

总体而言,GWAS 成功地确定了几个新的结构出生缺陷易感基因和基因组区域。这些发现为这些表型的病因学提供了新的见解。然而,GWAS 在理解几种出生缺陷的遗传病因方面的应用相对较少。

相似文献

1
Genome-wide association studies of structural birth defects: A review and commentary.
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1329-1342. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1606. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
2
Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2011-2015: A focus on eye and ear defects.
Birth Defects Res. 2018 Nov 15;110(19):1478-1486. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1413. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
3
Genetic epidemiology and nonsyndromic structural birth defects: from candidate genes to epigenetics.
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Apr;168(4):371-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4858.
4
Age of onset and effect size in genome-wide association studies.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012 Nov;94(11):908-11. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23066. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
5
Developments in our understanding of the genetic basis of birth defects.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015 Aug;103(8):680-91. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23385. Epub 2015 May 28.
6
Mitochondrial proteins and congenital birth defect risk: a mendelian randomization study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07562-8.
7
Biliary atresia is associated with polygenic susceptibility in ciliogenesis and planar polarity effector genes.
J Hepatol. 2023 Dec;79(6):1385-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.07.039. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Importance of gene-environment interactions in the etiology of selected birth defects.
Clin Genet. 2009 May;75(5):409-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01174.x.
9
Multiancestry Genome-Wide Association Study of Aortic Stenosis Identifies Multiple Novel Loci in the Million Veteran Program.
Circulation. 2023 Mar 21;147(12):942-955. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061451. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
10
Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysis.
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;34(3):696-701. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh363. Epub 2004 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

4
Integrative computational analyses implicate regulatory genomic elements contributing to spina bifida.
Genet Med Open. 2024 Sep 14;2:101894. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101894. eCollection 2024.
5
6
Role of non-chromosomal birth defects on the risk of developing childhood Hodgkin lymphoma: A Children's Oncology Group study.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Mar;71(3):e30822. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30822. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
7
Prevalence of congenital anomalies according to maternal race and ethnicity, Texas, 1999-2018.
Birth Defects Res. 2024 Jan;116(1):e2274. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2274. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
8
Factors Related to Relapse of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV) After the Ponseti Method.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 18;15(8):e43701. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43701. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Gene-environment interactions in birth defect etiology: Challenges and opportunities.
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2023;152:1-30. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

2
Gene-based genome-wide association studies and meta-analyses of conotruncal heart defects.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0219926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219926. eCollection 2019.
3
The role of genetic variation in DGKK on moderate and severe hypospadias.
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Aug 1;111(13):932-937. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1522. Epub 2019 May 18.
4
Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies.
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Aug;20(8):467-484. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1.
5
On the utilization of polygenic risk scores for therapeutic targeting.
PLoS Genet. 2019 Apr 25;15(4):e1008060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008060. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
What Are Polygenic Scores and Why Are They Important?
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1820-1821. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3893.
10
Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations.
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1219-1224. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验