Crescioli Giada, Lombardi Niccolò, Bettiol Alessandra, Menniti-Ippolito Francesca, Da Cas Roberto, Parrilli Maria, Del Lungo Martina, Gallo Eugenia, Mugelli Alessandro, Maggini Valentina, Firenzuoli Fabio, Vannacci Alfredo
Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;86(1):106-120. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14140. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Despite a significant increase in using cannabis for medical purposes, current evidence on its safety in real-world clinical practice is still poorly characterised. By a case-by-case analysis of spontaneous reports of suspected adverse events (AEs) collected in Tuscany within the Italian Phytovigilance database, the aim of the present study was to describe AEs occurred in patients exposed to medical cannabis.
We evaluated all reports of cannabis-related suspected AEs collected within the Phytovigilance database up to December 2018. Information regarding cannabis therapy, patient's demographic and clinical characteristics, concomitant medications, AE description according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification, AE seriousness and AE outcome, were collected. The causality assessment was performed following World Health Organisation-Uppsala Monitoring Centre criteria.
Fifty-three cannabis-related AE reports were analysed. The majority of patients were females (77.3%), with a mean age of 61.9 years. Thirty-nine (73.6%) cases were defined as nonserious and the majority of them (86.9%) showed a complete resolution or improvement. Forty-six (86.8%) cases were judged as probably related to cannabis consumption. The most frequently reported system organ class was psychiatric and nervous system disorders, and a potential drug-drug interaction was present in 16 cases.
Cannabis was generally well tolerated and the majority of AEs were mild and transient. Our analysis highlighted important safety issues for clinical practice, in particular the need for an accurate prescription monitoring during the titration phase, particularly in the presence of concomitant medications.
尽管医用大麻的使用显著增加,但目前关于其在实际临床实践中安全性的证据仍不充分。通过对意大利植物药警戒数据库中托斯卡纳地区收集的疑似不良事件(AE)自发报告进行逐案分析,本研究旨在描述接触医用大麻的患者发生的不良事件。
我们评估了截至2018年12月植物药警戒数据库中收集的所有与大麻相关的疑似AE报告。收集了有关大麻治疗、患者人口统计学和临床特征、伴随用药、根据《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA)分类的AE描述、AE严重程度和AE结局等信息。因果关系评估按照世界卫生组织-乌普萨拉监测中心标准进行。
分析了53份与大麻相关的AE报告。大多数患者为女性(77.3%),平均年龄61.9岁。39例(73.6%)被定义为非严重事件,其中大多数(86.9%)显示完全缓解或改善。46例(86.8%)被判定可能与大麻消费有关。最常报告的系统器官类别是精神和神经系统疾病,16例存在潜在的药物相互作用。
大麻总体耐受性良好,大多数AE为轻度且短暂。我们的分析突出了临床实践中的重要安全问题,特别是在滴定阶段需要准确的处方监测,尤其是在存在伴随用药的情况下。