Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Nov;128(8):867-880. doi: 10.1037/abn0000469.
Disturbances in motivation are prominent in the clinical presentation of people with schizophrenia and might reflect a disturbance in reward processing. Recent advances in affective neuroscience have subdivided reward processing into distinct components, but there are two limitations of the prior work in schizophrenia. First, studies typically focus on only one component rather than on the unfolding of reward processing across multiple stages. Second, studies have not considered the impact of certainty effects, which represent an important contextual factor that impacts processing. We examined whether individuals with schizophrenia show the typical certainty effects across three phases of reward processing: cue evaluation, feedback anticipation, and feedback receipt. Electroencephalography from 74 healthy controls and 92 people with schizophrenia was recorded during a cued gambling task under conditions in which cues indicated forthcoming reward outcomes that were certain or uncertain. Controls demonstrated the expected certainty effects across each stage. Initial cue evaluation (cue P300) was intact in the schizophrenia group, but people with schizophrenia showed diminished certainty effects during feedback anticipation (stimulus-preceding negativity [SPN]) and receipt (feedback reward positivity [fRewP] and feedback P300). During feedback receipt, event-related potentials in people with schizophrenia were similar to controls for the uncertain context but larger than controls for the certain context. Essentially, people with schizophrenia appeared to process certain feedback as though it were uncertain. These findings show, for the first time, that the fundamental distinction between certain and uncertain contexts is altered in schizophrenia at a neural level. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
动机障碍在精神分裂症患者的临床表现中很突出,可能反映了奖励处理的障碍。情感神经科学的最新进展将奖励处理细分为不同的成分,但先前在精神分裂症中的研究存在两个局限性。首先,研究通常只关注一个组成部分,而不是在多个阶段展开奖励处理。其次,研究尚未考虑确定性效应的影响,确定性效应是影响处理的一个重要背景因素。我们研究了精神分裂症患者在奖励处理的三个阶段(线索评估、反馈预期和反馈接收)中是否表现出典型的确定性效应。在一个线索赌博任务中,记录了 74 名健康对照者和 92 名精神分裂症患者的脑电信号,条件是线索表明即将到来的奖励结果是确定的还是不确定的。对照者在每个阶段都表现出了预期的确定性效应。精神分裂症组的初始线索评估(线索 P300)是完整的,但精神分裂症组在反馈预期(刺激前负性[SPN])和反馈接收(反馈奖励正性[fRewP]和反馈 P300)期间表现出确定性效应减弱。在反馈接收期间,精神分裂症患者的事件相关电位与不确定情境下的对照者相似,但与确定情境下的对照者相比更大。本质上,精神分裂症患者似乎将确定的反馈处理为不确定的反馈。这些发现首次表明,在神经水平上,精神分裂症患者对确定和不确定情境之间的基本区别发生了改变。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。