From the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (M.H.F.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; University Medical Centre Groningen (L.A.R.), University of Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery (S.L.), Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow; and Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (R.A.-S.S.), University of Edinburgh, UK.
Neurology. 2019 Nov 19;93(21):e1971-e1979. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008521. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
The efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) is uncertain, so we set out to quantify clinical outcomes after SRS for CCM and compare them to microsurgical excision or conservative management.
We searched Ovid Medline and Ovid EMBASE from inception until June 1, 2018, for peer-reviewed publications describing clinical outcomes after SRS for ≥10 people with CCM in cohorts with or without a comparison group treated with neurosurgical excision or conservative management. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies to quantify cohort characteristics and the incidence of the primary outcome (death attributable to CCM or its treatment) and secondary outcomes (incident nonfatal symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] and incident nonhemorrhagic persistent focal neurologic deficit [FND]). We assessed whether comparative studies showed a dramatic association (meaning the conventionally calculated probability comparing 2 differently managed patient groups from the same population was <0.01 with a rate ratio greater than 10).
We included 30 cohort studies involving a total of 1,576 patients undergoing SRS for CCM. Four nonrandomized studies compared SRS to other treatment strategies, but did not demonstrate dramatic associations. During a median follow-up of 48 (interquartile range 35-62) months after SRS, the annual incidences (95% confidence interval) of outcomes were death 0.18% (0.10-0.31), ICH 2.40% (2.05-2.80), FND 0.71% (0.53-0.96), and the composite of death, ICH, or FND 3.63% (3.17-4.16). Outcomes did not differ by CCM location or type of SRS.
After SRS for CCM, the annual incidences of death, ICH, and FND are <5% and seem comparable to outcomes without SRS. A randomized trial of SRS for CCM is needed.
立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗脑动静脉畸形(CCM)的疗效尚不确定,因此我们旨在量化 SRS 治疗 CCM 的临床结果,并将其与显微手术切除或保守治疗进行比较。
我们在 Ovid Medline 和 Ovid EMBASE 上进行了检索,检索时间从建库开始至 2018 年 6 月 1 日,以获取描述 SRS 治疗 CCM 后 ≥10 例患者临床结果的同行评审文献,这些研究纳入的患者队列中有或没有比较组,比较组接受神经外科切除或保守治疗。两名审查员独立从纳入的研究中提取数据,以量化队列特征和主要结局(归因于 CCM 或其治疗的死亡)和次要结局(新发非致命性症状性颅内出血 [ICH]和新发非出血性持续性局灶性神经功能缺损 [FND])的发生率。我们评估了比较研究是否显示出显著关联(意味着从同一人群中比较两个接受不同管理的患者组的传统计算概率<0.01,且率比大于 10)。
我们纳入了 30 项队列研究,共纳入了 1576 例接受 SRS 治疗的 CCM 患者。四项非随机研究比较了 SRS 与其他治疗策略,但未显示出显著关联。在 SRS 后中位随访 48(四分位距 35-62)个月期间,结局的年发生率(95%置信区间)分别为死亡 0.18%(0.10-0.31)、ICH 2.40%(2.05-2.80)、FND 0.71%(0.53-0.96)和死亡、ICH 或 FND 的复合发生率 3.63%(3.17-4.16)。CCM 位置或 SRS 类型对结局无影响。
在 SRS 治疗 CCM 后,死亡、ICH 和 FND 的年发生率<5%,且似乎与不接受 SRS 的结局相当。需要开展 SRS 治疗 CCM 的随机试验。