• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trust Me, I'm a Chatbot: How Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Fails the Turing Test.相信我,我是个聊天机器人:医疗保健领域的人工智能如何无法通过图灵测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 28;21(10):e16222. doi: 10.2196/16222.
2
Utilization of Self-Diagnosis Health Chatbots in Real-World Settings: Case Study.自我诊断健康聊天机器人在真实环境中的应用:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):e19928. doi: 10.2196/19928.
3
Unlocking the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Medicine.释放人工智能和大数据在医学中的力量。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 8;21(11):e16607. doi: 10.2196/16607.
4
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Behavior Change Model for Designing Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to Promote Physical Activity and a Healthy Diet: Viewpoint.人工智能聊天机器人行为改变模型设计人工智能聊天机器人促进身体活动和健康饮食:观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 30;22(9):e22845. doi: 10.2196/22845.
5
Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge.人工智能与实施挑战
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e13659. doi: 10.2196/13659.
6
A Medical Ethics Framework for Conversational Artificial Intelligence.医疗伦理框架下的会话式人工智能
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 26;25:e43068. doi: 10.2196/43068.
7
The Real Era of the Art of Medicine Begins with Artificial Intelligence.医学艺术的真正时代始于人工智能。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 18;21(11):e16295. doi: 10.2196/16295.
8
Will Artificial Intelligence Translate Big Data Into Improved Medical Care or Be a Source of Confusing Intrusion? A Discussion Between a (Cautious) Physician Informatician and an (Optimistic) Medical Informatics Researcher.人工智能会将大数据转化为更好的医疗服务,还是会成为令人困惑的干扰源?一位(谨慎的)医生信息专家与一位(乐观的)医学信息学研究员之间的讨论。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 27;21(11):e16272. doi: 10.2196/16272.
9
How to Evaluate Health Applications with Conversational User Interface?如何评估具有对话式用户界面的健康应用程序?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:976-980. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200307.
10
A Research Roadmap: Connected Health as an Enabler of Cancer Patient Support.一份研究路线图:连接健康作为癌症患者支持的推动者。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 29;21(10):e14360. doi: 10.2196/14360.

引用本文的文献

1
ChatGPT and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence in medical education.ChatGPT与医学教育中人工智能的可信度
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Apr 30;14:169. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_334_24. eCollection 2025.
2
A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare disparities.审视人工智能与医疗保健差距
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Mar 6;8:1545869. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1545869. eCollection 2025.
3
Prompt Engineering an Informational Chatbot for Education on Mental Health Using a Multiagent Approach for Enhanced Compliance With Prompt Instructions: Algorithm Development and Validation.使用多智能体方法构建用于心理健康教育的信息聊天机器人以提高对提示指令的依从性:算法开发与验证
JMIR AI. 2025 Mar 26;4:e69820. doi: 10.2196/69820.
4
Finding Consensus on Trust in AI in Health Care: Recommendations From a Panel of International Experts.在医疗保健领域对人工智能信任达成共识:国际专家小组的建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 19;27:e56306. doi: 10.2196/56306.
5
Beyond the Screen: The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Patient Learning and the Patient-Physician Relationship.屏幕之外:生成式人工智能对患者学习及医患关系的影响
Cureus. 2025 Jan 2;17(1):e76825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76825. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Do patients prefer a human doctor, artificial intelligence, or a blend, and is this preference dependent on medical discipline? Empirical evidence and implications for medical practice.患者更喜欢人类医生、人工智能还是两者的结合,这种偏好是否取决于医学学科?来自实证研究的证据及其对医疗实践的启示。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1422177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422177. eCollection 2024.
7
ChatGPT-3.5 System Usability Scale early assessment among Healthcare Workers: Horizons of adoption in medical practice.医疗工作者对ChatGPT-3.5系统可用性量表的早期评估:在医疗实践中的应用前景
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 7;10(7):e28962. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28962. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
8
ChatGPT's Response Consistency: A Study on Repeated Queries of Medical Examination Questions.ChatGPT的回答一致性:关于医学考试问题重复查询的研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):657-668. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030043.
9
Delayed diagnosis of a transient ischemic attack caused by ChatGPT.因 ChatGPT 导致的短暂性脑缺血发作被延误诊断。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Apr;136(7-8):236-238. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02329-1. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
10
A digital innovation typology: Navigating the complexity of emerging technologies to negotiate health systems research with young people.一种数字创新类型学:应对新兴技术的复杂性以与年轻人协商卫生系统研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 7;9:20552076231212286. doi: 10.1177/20552076231212286. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review.人工智能与临床医生在疾病诊断中的比较:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 16;7(3):e10010. doi: 10.2196/10010.
2
Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge.人工智能与实施挑战
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e13659. doi: 10.2196/13659.
3
Physicians' Perceptions of Chatbots in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.医生对医疗保健中聊天机器人的认知:基于网络的横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12887. doi: 10.2196/12887.
4
Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges.机器学习在医学中的应用:应对伦理挑战。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
A cross sectional survey of the UK public to understand use of online ratings and reviews of health services.横断面调查英国公众对在线健康服务评分和评论的使用情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Sep;101(9):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
6
Assessing the Efficacy of Mobile Health Apps Using the Basic Principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Systematic Review.运用认知行为疗法基本原理评估移动健康应用程序的疗效:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 28;19(11):e399. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8598.
7
Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies.超越采用:一个用于理论化和评估健康与护理技术的未采用、废弃以及扩大规模、传播和可持续性挑战的新框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):e367. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775.
8
A study of automated self-assessment in a primary care student health centre setting.一项关于初级保健学生健康中心环境下自动自我评估的研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Apr;20(3):123-7. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14529246. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology.成功实施和采用大规模卫生信息技术的十大关键考虑因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e9-e13. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001684. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
10
Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: ethnographic study using normalisation process theory.在英国国家医疗服务体系的急诊和紧急护理中使用计算机决策支持系统:使用常态过程理论的民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 23;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-111.

相信我,我是个聊天机器人:医疗保健领域的人工智能如何无法通过图灵测试。

Trust Me, I'm a Chatbot: How Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Fails the Turing Test.

作者信息

Powell John

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 28;21(10):e16222. doi: 10.2196/16222.

DOI:10.2196/16222
PMID:31661083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6914236/
Abstract

Over the next decade, one issue which will dominate sociotechnical studies in health informatics is the extent to which the promise of artificial intelligence in health care will be realized, along with the social and ethical issues which accompany it. A useful thought experiment is the application of the Turing test to user-facing artificial intelligence systems in health care (such as chatbots or conversational agents). In this paper I argue that many medical decisions require value judgements and the doctor-patient relationship requires empathy and understanding to arrive at a shared decision, often handling large areas of uncertainty and balancing competing risks. Arguably, medicine requires wisdom more than intelligence, artificial or otherwise. Artificial intelligence therefore needs to supplement rather than replace medical professionals, and identifying the complementary positioning of artificial intelligence in medical consultation is a key challenge for the future. In health care, artificial intelligence needs to pass the implementation game, not the imitation game.

摘要

在接下来的十年里,一个将主导健康信息学社会技术研究的问题是,医疗保健领域人工智能的前景能在多大程度上得以实现,以及随之而来的社会和伦理问题。一个有用的思想实验是将图灵测试应用于医疗保健中面向用户的人工智能系统(如聊天机器人或对话代理)。在本文中,我认为许多医疗决策需要价值判断,医患关系需要同理心和理解才能达成共同决策,这通常要处理大量的不确定性并平衡相互竞争的风险。可以说,医学需要的是智慧而非智能,无论是人工的还是其他的。因此,人工智能需要补充而不是取代医学专业人员,确定人工智能在医疗咨询中的互补定位是未来的一项关键挑战。在医疗保健领域,人工智能需要通过实施游戏,而不是模仿游戏。