Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Jan;45(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/coa.13467. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
The United States has a heterogenous health insurance landscape for patients <65 years. We sought to characterise the impact of primary payer on overall survival (OS) in insured patients younger than 65 with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with definitive radiotherapy.
DESIGN/STUDY/PARTICIPANTS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients <65 years old diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 undergoing definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy for cancers of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx. Uninsured patients and oropharyngeal cancers without known HPV status were excluded.
Overall survival.
Overall, 27 292 insured patients were identified, including 17 060 (62.5%) with private insurance. Median follow-up was 52.1 months. In multivariable models, patients receiving Medicaid (HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.57-1.75, P < .001), Medicare (HR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.55-1.73, P < .001) and other government insurance (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.29-1., P < .001) had independently increased mortality in comparison to those with private insurance. In propensity score-matched cohorts, 5-year OS was 65.5% vs 50.6% for privately vs government-insured patients, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable subgroup analysis, private insurance was associated with improved survival in all subgroups. However, the magnitude of this effect was most pronounced in patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer vs non-HPV-related cancer (interaction P < .001), younger patients (interaction P = .001), and those without comorbidity (interaction P < .001).
Patients <65 with HNSCC undergoing definitive radiation with private health insurance have markedly longer survival relative to patients with government-sponsored insurance. This illustrates that increasing access to care may be necessary, but is not sufficient, to mitigate the significant disparities in the US healthcare system.
美国 65 岁以下患者的医疗保险种类繁多。我们旨在研究主要支付方对接受根治性放疗的 65 岁以下头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者总生存期(OS)的影响。
设计/研究/参与者:国家癌症数据库(National Cancer Database)检索了 2004 年至 2014 年间接受根治性放疗±化疗的鼻咽癌、口咽癌、下咽癌和喉癌患者的年龄小于 65 岁且未参保和口咽癌患者且 HPV 状态未知的患者被排除在外。
总生存期。
共有 27292 名参保患者,其中 17060 名(62.5%)有私人保险。中位随访时间为 52.1 个月。在多变量模型中,接受医疗补助(HR=1.66,95%CI 1.57-1.75,P<.001)、医疗保险(HR=1.64,95%CI 1.55-1.73,P<.001)和其他政府保险(HR=1.44,95%CI 1.29-1.00,P<.001)的患者与私人保险患者相比,死亡率独立升高。在倾向评分匹配队列中,5 年 OS 分别为私人保险患者的 65.5%和政府保险患者的 50.6%(P<.001)。在多变量亚组分析中,私人保险与所有亚组的生存改善相关。然而,这种影响的幅度在 HPV 阳性口咽癌患者与非 HPV 相关癌症患者(交互 P<.001)、年轻患者(交互 P=0.001)和无合并症患者(交互 P<.001)中最为明显。
接受根治性放疗的 65 岁以下 HNSCC 患者,与有政府资助保险的患者相比,私人健康保险患者的生存期明显延长。这表明,增加获得医疗服务的机会可能是必要的,但不足以缓解美国医疗体系中存在的巨大差异。