Suppr超能文献

高容量中心以外地区前列腺MRI(PI-RADS第2版)的性能及观察者间变异性

Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres.

作者信息

Kohestani Kimia, Wallström Jonas, Dehlfors Niclas, Sponga Ole Martin, Månsson Marianne, Josefsson Andreas, Carlsson Sigrid, Hellström Mikael, Hugosson Jonas

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Urology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Urol. 2019 Oct;53(5):304-311. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1675757. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

Abstract

Despite the growing trend to embrace pre-biopsy MRI in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PC), its performance and inter-observer variability outside high-volume centres remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate sensitivity of and variability between readers of prostate MRI outside specialized units with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen as the reference standard. Retrospective study comprising a consecutive cohort of all 97 men who underwent MRI and subsequent RP between January 2012 and December 2014 at a private hospital in Sweden. Three readers, blinded to clinical data, reviewed all images (including 11 extra prostate MRI to reduce bias). A tumour was considered detected if the overall PI-RADS v2 score was 3-5 and there was an approximate match (same or neighbouring sector) of tumour sector according to a 24 sector system used for both MRI and whole mount sections. Detection rate for the index tumour ranged from 67 to 76%, if PI-RADS 3-5 lesions were considered positive and 54-66% if only PI-RADS score 4-5 tumours were included. Detection rate for aggressive tumours (GS ≥ 4 + 3) was higher; 83.1% for PI-RADS 3-5 and 79.2% for PI-RADS 4-5. The agreement between readers showed average [Formula: see text] values of 0.41 for PI-RADS score 3-5 and 0.51 for PI-RADS score 4-5. Prostate MRI evidenced a moderate detection rate for clinically significant PC with a rather large variability between readers. Clinics outside specialized units must have knowledge of their performance of prostate MRI before considering omitting biopsies in men with negative MRI.

摘要

尽管在前列腺癌(PC)诊断流程中采用活检前磁共振成像(MRI)的趋势日益增长,但其在高容量中心以外的性能及观察者间变异性仍不明确。本研究旨在以根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本作为参考标准,评估专科单位以外前列腺MRI读者之间的敏感性和变异性。回顾性研究纳入了2012年1月至2014年12月期间在瑞典一家私立医院连续接受MRI检查及后续RP的所有97名男性。三名对临床数据不知情的读者审阅了所有图像(包括11例额外的前列腺MRI以减少偏差)。如果根据用于MRI和全层切片的24扇区系统,总体PI-RADS v2评分3 - 5且肿瘤扇区大致匹配(相同或相邻扇区),则认为检测到肿瘤。如果将PI-RADS 3 - 5病变视为阳性,索引肿瘤的检测率为67%至76%;如果仅纳入PI-RADS评分4 - 5的肿瘤,检测率为54%至66%。侵袭性肿瘤(GS≥4 + 3)的检测率更高;PI-RADS 3 - 5为83.1%,PI-RADS 4 - 5为79.2%。读者之间的一致性显示,PI-RADS评分3 - 5的平均[公式:见原文]值为0.41,PI-RADS评分4 - 5的为0.51。前列腺MRI对临床显著PC的检测率中等,读者间变异性较大。在考虑对MRI阴性的男性省略活检之前,专科单位以外的诊所必须了解其前列腺MRI的性能。

相似文献

1
Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres.
Scand J Urol. 2019 Oct;53(5):304-311. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1675757. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
5
Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108704. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3383-3392. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06654-2. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
10
[Implications of PI-RADS Version 1 and Updated Version 2 on the Scoring of Prostatic Lesions in Multiparametric MRI].
Aktuelle Urol. 2016 Sep;47(5):383-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111128. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances and Challenges in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;17(13):2137. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132137.
4
Enhancing prostate cancer segmentation in bpMRI: Integrating zonal awareness into attention-guided U-Net.
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 24;11:20552076251314546. doi: 10.1177/20552076251314546. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study.
Prostate Int. 2024 Sep;12(3):128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
6
Prostate magnetic resonance imaging and the value of experience: An intrareader variability study.
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
Inter-reader Agreement for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Micro-ultrasound: A Multi-institutional Study.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Jul 13;66:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.017. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
The role of urology and radiology in prostate biopsy: current trends and future perspectives.
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 22;42(1):249. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04967-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Abbreviated Biparametric Versus Standard Multiparametric MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Feb;212(2):357-365. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20103. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):369-378. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18946. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
4
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists.
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):186-195. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017152877. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul;209(1):W1-W9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16981. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
The Learning Curve in Prostate MRI Interpretation: Self-Directed Learning Versus Continual Reader Feedback.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):W92-W100. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16876. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
10
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验