• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉腔内激光消融术与射频消融术治疗静脉曲张的超声结果比较

Comparison of ultrasound results following endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of varicose veins.

作者信息

Ontas Hakan, Yavuz Turhan, Acar Altay Nihat, Uysal Dinçer

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:457-462.

PMID:31661439
Abstract

PURPOSE

Superficial venous insufficiency is a common problem associated with varicose veins. In addition to classical symptoms, it may result in skin changes, venous ulcers and has a great impact on patients' health-related quality of life. In the last decade, minimally invasive techniques such as endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been developed as alternatives to surgery in an attempt to reduce morbidity and improve efficiency. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of EVLA and RF therapies in superficial venous insufficiency.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty legs belonging to 50 patients with symptomatic primary venous insufficiency were treated. 25 saphenous veins treated with 1470 nmdiode laser, while 25, saphenous veins treated with bipolar Radiofrequency Induced Thermotherapy (RF). All patients underwent postoperative duplex scanning within 6 month after the procedure and followed clinically, to determine the severity of the venous disease. Complications and occlusion rates were recorded.

RESULTS

Total occlusion rates in RF and EVLA groups were 100% and was 100%, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups (p=0,140). Major complications such as skin burns, deep venous thrombosis have not been detected for both groups. 2 patients treated with EVLA had erythema (8%) and 1 patient had a pain sensation (4%). 1 patient in the RF group had erythema (4%), 1 had pain (4%) and 1 had a burning sensation (4%).

CONCLUSION

EVLA and RF therapies in saphenous vein insufficiency are effective, minimally invasive, safe, easy to use treatment modalities with good patient satisfaction and high occlusion rates.

KEY WORDS

EVLA, Radiofrquency, Venous insufficiency.

摘要

目的

浅静脉功能不全是与静脉曲张相关的常见问题。除了典型症状外,它还可能导致皮肤改变、静脉溃疡,并对患者的健康相关生活质量产生重大影响。在过去十年中,诸如腔内激光消融术(EVLA)和射频消融术(RFA)等微创技术已被开发出来作为手术的替代方法,以试图降低发病率并提高效率。本研究的目的是评估EVLA和射频治疗在浅静脉功能不全中的疗效。

材料与方法

对50例有症状的原发性静脉功能不全患者的50条腿进行治疗。25条大隐静脉用1470纳米二极管激光治疗,而另外25条大隐静脉用双极射频诱导热疗(RF)治疗。所有患者在术后6个月内接受双功超声扫描,并进行临床随访,以确定静脉疾病的严重程度。记录并发症和闭塞率。

结果

射频组和腔内激光消融术组的总闭塞率分别为100%和100%。两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.140)。两组均未检测到皮肤烧伤、深静脉血栓形成等主要并发症。接受腔内激光消融术治疗的2例患者出现红斑(8%),1例患者有疼痛感(4%)。射频组1例患者出现红斑(4%),1例有疼痛(4%),1例有烧灼感(4%)。

结论

腔内激光消融术和射频治疗大隐静脉功能不全是有效、微创、安全、易于使用的治疗方式,患者满意度高,闭塞率高。

关键词

腔内激光消融术;射频;静脉功能不全

相似文献

1
Comparison of ultrasound results following endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of varicose veins.静脉腔内激光消融术与射频消融术治疗静脉曲张的超声结果比较
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:457-462.
2
Endovenous thermal ablation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: single-center experience with 3000 limbs treated in a 7-year period.下肢浅静脉功能不全的腔内热消融术:7年单中心3000例肢体治疗经验
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):500-5. doi: 10.1583/09-2750.1.
3
Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Laser Ablation for Small Saphenous Vein Varicosis.腔内微波消融与激光消融治疗小隐静脉曲张的比较。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2342-2351. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02854-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Endovenous laser with miniphlebectomy for treatment of varicose veins and effect of different levels of laser energy on recanalization. A single center experience.静脉内激光联合小切口静脉切除术治疗静脉曲张及不同激光能量水平对再通的影响:单中心经验
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Jan;30(1):103-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1626-0. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varicose Veins in the Same Patient.同一患者接受静脉腔内激光与射频消融治疗静脉曲张的比较。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Jan;50(1):47-51. doi: 10.1177/1538574415625813. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Long-term outcomes of endovenous laser ablation, n-butyl cyanoacrylate, and radiofrequency ablation for treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.腔内激光消融、氰基丙烯酸正丁酯和射频消融治疗慢性静脉功能不全的长期疗效。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Jul;10(4):865-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.对于小隐静脉曲张,腔内消融治疗(激光或射频)或泡沫硬化疗法与传统手术修复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD010878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2.
8
Delineating the durability outcome differences after saphenous ablation with laser versus radiofrequency.比较激光与射频消融治疗大隐静脉后耐久性结局的差异。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jul;7(4):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.11.013.
9
Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study).前瞻性对比队列研究评估射频分段消融或 1470nm 腔内激光消融联合放射状光纤治疗大隐静脉反流(Varico 2 研究)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jan;6(1):31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus direct and indirect radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins.随机对照临床试验:静脉腔内激光消融术与直接和间接射频消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张的比较。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jul;106(8):998-1004. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11187. Epub 2019 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Endovenous radiofrequency ablation vs laser ablation in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: A meta-analysis.静脉内射频消融与激光消融治疗下肢静脉曲张患者的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Sep;12(5):101842. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101842. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
2
Brazilian guidelines on chronic venous disease of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.巴西血管病学和血管外科学会关于慢性静脉疾病的巴西指南。
J Vasc Bras. 2023 Nov 6;22:e20230064. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300642. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative analysis of endovenous laser ablation versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of venous leg ulcers.
腔内激光消融与超声引导下泡沫硬化剂治疗静脉性下肢溃疡的对比分析。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Apr;35(4):e15322. doi: 10.1111/dth.15322. Epub 2022 Jan 27.