• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌痛的疗效和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析开放标签延伸试验,研究持续时间≥26 周。

Efficacy and harms of long-term opioid therapy in chronic non-cancer pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis of open-label extension trials with a study duration ≥26 weeks.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Department of Pain Medicine, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2020 Feb;24(2):265-278. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1496. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1002/ejp.1496
PMID:31661587
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This updated systematic review evaluated the efficacy, acceptability and safety of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP).

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

Clinicaltrials.gov, CENTRAL and MEDLINE until June 2019. We included open-label extension trials with a study duration ≥26 weeks of RCTs with ≥2 weeks duration. Pooled estimates of event rates of categorical data and standardized mean differences (SMD) of continuous variables were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

We added four new studies with 1,154 participants for a total of 15 studies with 3,590 participants. Study duration ranged between 26 and 156 weeks. Studies included patients with low back, osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain. The quality of evidence for every outcome was very low. 31.1% (95% Confidence interval [CI] 23.0%-40.7%) of patients randomized at baseline finished the open label period. 14.1% (95% CI 10.9%-19.4%) of patients dropped out to due adverse events. In 6.3% (95 CI 3.9%-10.1%) of patients serious adverse events and in 2.7% (95% CI 1.5%-4.7%) aberrant drug behaviour were noted. 0.5% (95% CI 0.2%-1.4%) of patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of open-label extension studies, opioids maintain reduction of pain and disability and are rather well tolerated and safe. LTOT can be considered in carefully selected and monitored patients with low back, osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain who experience a clinically meaningful pain reduction with at least tolerable adverse events in short-term opioid therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

There is very low quality evidence of the long-term efficacy, tolerability and safety of opioids for chronic low back, osteoarthritis and diabetic polyneuropathic pain within the context of open-label extension studies of randomized controlled trials. Drop out rate due to adverse events and deaths increase with study duration. One-third of patients profit from LTOT. Long-term opioid therapy can be considered in some carefully selected and monitored patients.

摘要

背景与目的

本更新的系统评价评估了长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的疗效、可接受性和安全性。

数据库和数据处理

Clinicaltrials.gov、CENTRAL 和 MEDLINE 截至 2019 年 6 月。我们纳入了研究时间≥26 周的开放标签延伸试验和持续时间≥2 周的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用随机效应模型计算分类数据的事件率和连续变量的标准化均数差(SMD)的汇总估计值。

结果

我们新增了四项研究,共纳入 1154 名参与者,共计 15 项研究,纳入 3590 名参与者。研究持续时间为 26-156 周。研究包括腰痛、骨关节炎和神经病理性疼痛患者。每个结局的证据质量均非常低。基线随机分组的 31.1%(95%置信区间[CI] 23.0%-40.7%)患者完成了开放标签期。14.1%(95%CI 10.9%-19.4%)的患者因不良事件而退出。在 6.3%(95%CI 3.9%-10.1%)的患者中观察到严重不良事件,在 2.7%(95%CI 1.5%-4.7%)的患者中观察到异常药物行为。有 0.5%(95%CI 0.2%-1.4%)的患者死亡。

结论

在开放标签延伸研究中,阿片类药物可以持续减轻疼痛和残疾,并且具有较好的耐受性和安全性。对于接受短期阿片类药物治疗后疼痛有临床意义缓解且至少可耐受不良反应的慢性腰痛、骨关节炎和糖尿病性多发性神经病患者,可考虑长期使用阿片类药物。

意义

在随机对照试验的开放标签延伸研究中,阿片类药物治疗慢性腰痛、骨关节炎和糖尿病性多发性神经病疼痛的长期疗效、耐受性和安全性的证据质量非常低。由于不良事件和死亡导致的脱落率随研究时间的延长而增加。三分之一的患者受益于 LTOT。长期阿片类药物治疗可考虑用于一些精心选择和监测的患者。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and harms of long-term opioid therapy in chronic non-cancer pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis of open-label extension trials with a study duration ≥26 weeks.长期阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌痛的疗效和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析开放标签延伸试验,研究持续时间≥26 周。
Eur J Pain. 2020 Feb;24(2):265-278. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1496. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
2
[Long-term opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in open-label extension trials with study duration of at least 26 weeks].[慢性非癌性疼痛的长期阿片类药物治疗。对研究持续时间至少为26周的开放标签延长期试验中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行系统评价和荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):96-108. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1452-0.
3
[Opioids in chronic neuropathic pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].[阿片类药物用于慢性神经性疼痛。对至少持续4周的随机安慰剂对照研究中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行系统评价和荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1455-x.
4
[Opioids in chronic noncancer pain-are opioids superior to nonopioid analgesics? A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized head-to-head comparisons of opioids versus nonopioid analgesics of at least four week's duration].[慢性非癌性疼痛中的阿片类药物——阿片类药物优于非阿片类镇痛药吗?对阿片类药物与非阿片类镇痛药至少持续四周的随机直接比较中的疗效、耐受性和安全性的系统评价与荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1436-0.
5
[Opioids in chronic osteoarthritis pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].[阿片类药物用于慢性骨关节炎疼痛。对至少持续4周的随机安慰剂对照研究中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行的系统评价与荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):47-59. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1451-1.
6
[Opioids in chronic low back pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration].[阿片类药物用于慢性下腰痛。对至少持续4周的随机安慰剂对照研究中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行的系统评价和荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):60-72. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1449-8.
7
Opioids for chronic non-cancer neuropathic pain. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration.阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性神经病理性疼痛。一项在至少 4 周的随机安慰剂对照研究中评估疗效、耐受性和安全性的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):3-18. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1494. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Opioids for chronic osteoarthritis pain: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks double-blind duration.阿片类药物治疗慢性骨关节炎疼痛:至少 4 周双盲持续时间的随机安慰剂对照研究中疗效、耐受性和安全性的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2020 Apr;24(4):685-703. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1522. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
9
Opioids for chronic low back pain: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks of double-blind duration.慢性下背痛的阿片类药物:至少 4 周双盲期随机安慰剂对照研究的疗效、耐受性和安全性的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2020 Mar;24(3):497-517. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1519. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
10
[Opioids in chronic noncancer pain-are opioids different? A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized head-to-head comparisons of opioids of at least four week's duration].[慢性非癌性疼痛中的阿片类药物——阿片类药物有区别吗?对至少为期四周的阿片类药物随机直接比较中的疗效、耐受性和安全性进行的系统评价与荟萃分析]
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1432-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Pathophysiology and New Insights into the Mechanism of Action of High-Concentration Topical Capsaicin.糖尿病性周围神经病变:病理生理学及高浓度局部用辣椒素作用机制的新见解
J Exp Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 9;17:651-665. doi: 10.2147/JEP.S526968. eCollection 2025.
2
Sleep Quality in Chronic Pain Patients With and Without Strong Opioid Use: An Observational Study Using a Wearable Device.使用和未使用强效阿片类药物的慢性疼痛患者的睡眠质量:一项使用可穿戴设备的观察性研究。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Sep;45(3):e70052. doi: 10.1002/npr2.70052.
3
Needs and Wishes Towards Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Chronic Pain Management: A Qualitative Study with German General Practitioners.
对性别敏感的慢性疼痛管理的需求与期望:一项针对德国全科医生的定性研究
J Pain Res. 2025 May 20;18:2567-2581. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S522497. eCollection 2025.
4
Virtual Reality Interventions and Chronic Pain: Scoping Review.虚拟现实干预与慢性疼痛:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 18;27:e59922. doi: 10.2196/59922.
5
Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Identified Using STOPP/START Version 3 in Geriatric Patients and Comparison with Version 2: A Cross-Sectional Study.使用STOPP/START第3版在老年患者中识别潜在不适当处方并与第2版进行比较:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6043. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206043.
6
Misuse, Abuse and Medication Errors' Adverse Events Associated with Opioids-A Systematic Review.与阿片类药物相关的误用、滥用及用药错误不良事件——一项系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;17(8):1009. doi: 10.3390/ph17081009.
7
Opioid Therapy and Implications for Oxidative Balance: A Clinical Study of Total Oxidative Capacity (TOC) and Total Antioxidative Capacity (TAC).阿片类药物治疗及其对氧化平衡的影响:总氧化能力(TOC)和总抗氧化能力(TAC)的临床研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 22;13(1):82. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010082.
8
Identifying Prescription-Opioid-Related Risks Using Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs' Algorithms and Clinical Screening Tools.使用处方药监测程序算法和临床筛查工具识别与处方阿片类药物相关的风险。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;11(5):164. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11050164.
9
Continued Opioid Use and Adverse Events Following Provision of Opioids for Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在急诊科为肌肉骨骼疼痛提供阿片类药物后继续使用阿片类药物和不良事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2023 Nov;83(16):1523-1535. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01941-1. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
10
Notochordal cells: A potential therapeutic option for intervertebral disc degeneration.脊索细胞:椎间盘退变的一种潜在治疗选择。
Cell Prolif. 2024 Feb;57(2):e13541. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13541. Epub 2023 Sep 11.