Center on Violence against Women and Children, School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2021 May-Jun;69(4):390-395. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1679153. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
This study explored differences in attitudes about sexual violence, knowledge of intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention resources, and participation in IPV prevention activities among young men based on their fraternity membership and house status (ie, official house versus unofficial house versus no house). : 1,457 undergraduate men completed surveys in the 2017-2018 academic year. Fraternity members indicated whether their fraternity had an official, unofficial, or no house. : The survey included measures of attitudes towards sexual violence, knowledge of IPV resources, and participation in IPV prevention activities. : Fraternity members with unofficial houses were more accepting of sexual violence than nonmembers, whereas fraternity members with official houses were exposed to more IPV prevention messages than nonmembers. : Results highlight the importance of considering fraternity house status as a risk factor for sexual violence. Unofficial houses that are not regulated by the university may be particularly problematic for IPV.
本研究探讨了基于联谊会成员身份和宿舍状态（即正式宿舍、非官方宿舍和无宿舍），年轻男性对性暴力的态度、对亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）预防资源的了解以及参与 IPV 预防活动的差异。在 2017-2018 学年，1457 名本科男性完成了调查。联谊会成员表示他们的联谊会是否有正式、非官方或无宿舍。调查包括对性暴力态度、对 IPV 资源的了解以及参与 IPV 预防活动的措施。与非成员相比，拥有非官方宿舍的联谊会成员对性暴力的接受程度更高，而拥有官方宿舍的联谊会成员比非成员接触到更多的 IPV 预防信息。研究结果强调了考虑联谊会宿舍状态作为性暴力风险因素的重要性。不受大学监管的非官方宿舍可能对 IPV 特别成问题。
