Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
AIMS@JCU, Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB 3, Townsville MC, Queensland 4810, Australia.
Biol Lett. 2019 Oct 31;15(10):20190493. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0493. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Natural environmental gradients encompass systematic variation in abiotic factors that can be exploited to test competing explanations of biodiversity patterns. The (SE) hypothesis attempts to explain species richness gradients as a function of energy availability. However, limited empirical support for SE is often attributed to idiosyncratic, local-scale processes distorting the underlying SE relationship. Meanwhile, studies are also often confounded by factors such as sampling biases, dispersal boundaries and unclear definitions of energy availability. Here, we used spatially structured observations of 8460 colonies of photo-symbiotic reef-building corals and a null-model to test whether energy can explain observed coral species richness over depth. Species richness was left-skewed, hump-shaped and unrelated to energy availability. While local-scale processes were evident, their influence on species richness was insufficient to reconcile observations with model predictions. Therefore, energy availability, either in isolation or in combination with local deterministic processes, was unable to explain coral species richness across depth. Our results demonstrate that local-scale processes do not necessarily explain deviations in species richness from theoretical models, and that the use of idiosyncratic small-scale factors to explain large-scale ecological patterns requires the utmost caution.
自然环境梯度包含非生物因素的系统变化,可以利用这些变化来检验生物多样性模式的竞争解释。(SE)假说试图将物种丰富度梯度解释为能量供应的函数。然而,SE 的有限经验支持通常归因于特有的、局部尺度的过程,这些过程扭曲了潜在的 SE 关系。同时,研究还经常受到采样偏差、扩散边界和能量供应不明确等因素的混淆。在这里,我们使用空间结构观测到的 8460 个共生藻类珊瑚殖民地和一个零模型来检验能量是否可以解释观测到的珊瑚物种丰富度随深度的变化。物种丰富度呈左偏态、驼峰状,与能量供应无关。虽然局部尺度的过程是明显的,但它们对物种丰富度的影响不足以使观测结果与模型预测相协调。因此,能量供应(无论是单独还是与局部确定性过程结合)都无法解释珊瑚物种丰富度随深度的变化。我们的结果表明,局部尺度的过程不一定能解释物种丰富度偏离理论模型的情况,而且利用特有的小尺度因素来解释大尺度的生态模式需要极其谨慎。