College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Environmental Materials & Remediation Technologies, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, 402160, China.
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Environ Pollut. 2020 Jan;256:113414. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113414. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
The accurate assessment of soil selenium (Se) bioavailability is crucial for Se biofortification in Se-deficient areas and risk assessment in selenosis areas. However, a universally accepted approach to evaluate Se bioavailability in soil is currently lacking. This research investigated Se bioavailability in six soils treated with selenite (Se(IV)) or selenate (Se(VI)) by comparing diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) technique and chemical extraction methods through pot experiments. A bioindicator method was used to evaluate Se concentrations in pak choi and compare the results with the Se concentration measured by other methods. Results showed that chemical extraction methods presented different extraction efficiencies for available Se over a range of soil types, and the same extraction method had various extraction efficiencies for different Se species in the same soil. DGT measured Se concentrations (C-Se) for Se(VI) treatment were 2.3-34.1 times of those for Se(IV) treatment. KHPO-KHPO and AB-DTPA extractable Se could predict the bioavailability of soil Se, but they were disturbed by soil properties. HAc extraction was unsuitable for evaluating Se bioavailability in different Se(IV)-treated soils. By contrast, DGT technique was preferable for predicting plant uptake of Se(IV) over chemical extraction methods. Although DGT technique was independent of soil properties, KHPO-KHPO extraction provided the best fitting regression equation for Se(VI) when it was dependent on soil organic matter. Thus, KHPO-KHPO extraction may be preferred to assess Se(VI) bioavailability in different soil types on a large scale.
准确评估土壤硒(Se)的生物可利用性对于缺硒地区的硒生物强化和富硒地区的风险评估至关重要。然而,目前缺乏一种普遍接受的评估土壤中硒生物可利用性的方法。本研究通过盆栽实验,对比扩散梯度薄膜(DGT)技术和化学提取方法,研究了亚硒酸盐(Se(IV))和硒酸盐(Se(VI))处理的六种土壤中的硒生物可利用性。采用生物指示物方法评价了白菜体内的硒浓度,并与其他方法测量的硒浓度进行了比较。结果表明,化学提取方法在不同土壤类型中对有效硒的提取效率不同,同一提取方法对同一土壤中不同硒形态的提取效率也不同。DGT 测量的 Se(VI)处理的 Se 浓度(C-Se)是 Se(IV)处理的 2.3-34.1 倍。KHPO-KHPO 和 AB-DTPA 可提取硒可以预测土壤 Se 的生物可利用性,但受土壤性质的干扰。HAc 提取不适合评价不同 Se(IV)处理土壤中的 Se 生物可利用性。相比之下,DGT 技术比化学提取方法更适合预测植物对 Se(IV)的吸收。尽管 DGT 技术不受土壤性质的影响,但 KHPO-KHPO 提取在依赖土壤有机质时为 Se(VI)提供了最佳拟合回归方程。因此,KHPO-KHPO 提取可能更适合在不同土壤类型中评估 Se(VI)的生物可利用性。