Suppr超能文献

高危妊娠中院内监护与远程监护的对比(HOTEL):一项多中心非劣效性随机对照试验的研究方案。

HOspital care versus TELemonitoring in high-risk pregnancy (HOTEL): study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e031700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031700.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women faced with complications of pregnancy often require long-term hospital admission for maternal and/or fetal monitoring. Antenatal admissions cause a burden to patients as well as hospital resources and costs. A telemonitoring platform connected to wireless cardiotocography (CTG) and automated blood pressure (BP) devices can be used for telemonitoring in pregnancy. Home telemonitoring might improve autonomy and reduce admissions and thus costs. The aim of this study is to compare the effects on patient safety, satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of spital care versus emonitoring (HOTEL) as an obstetric care strategy in high-risk pregnancies requiring daily monitoring.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The HOTEL trial is an ongoing multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial with a non-inferiority design. Eligible pregnant women are >26+0 weeks of singleton gestation requiring monitoring because of pre-eclampsia (hypertension with proteinuria), fetal growth restriction, preterm rupture of membranes without contractions, recurrent reduced fetal movements or an intrauterine fetal death in a previous pregnancy.Randomisation takes place between traditional hospitalisation (planned n=208) versus telemonitoring (planned n=208) until delivery. Telemonitoring at home is facilitated with Sense4Baby CTG devices, Microlife BP monitor and daily telephone calls with an obstetric healthcare professional as well as weekly hospital visits.Primary outcome is a composite of adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal mortality, 5 min Apgar <7 or arterial cord blood pH <7.05, maternal morbidity (eclampsia, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome, thromboembolic event), neonatal intensive care admission and caesarean section rate. Patient satisfaction and preference of care will be assessed using validated questionnaires. We will perform an economic analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention to treat principle.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Utrecht University Medical Center and the boards of all six participating centres. Trial results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR6076.

摘要

简介

孕妇在妊娠期间出现并发症时,通常需要长期住院进行母婴和/或胎儿监测。产前住院给患者和医院资源及成本带来负担。连接无线胎心监护仪(CTG)和自动血压(BP)设备的远程监护平台可用于妊娠期间的远程监护。家庭远程监护可能会提高自主性,减少住院次数,从而降低成本。本研究旨在比较高危妊娠(因子痫前期、胎儿生长受限、胎膜早破无宫缩、反复胎动减少或既往妊娠宫内胎儿死亡而需要每日监测)的患者安全、满意度和成本效益,以医院护理与远程监护(HOTEL)作为产科护理策略的效果。

方法和分析

HOTEL 试验是一项正在进行的多中心随机对照临床试验,采用非劣效性设计。纳入标准为妊娠 26+0 周以上的单胎妊娠孕妇,因子痫前期(高血压伴蛋白尿)、胎儿生长受限、胎膜早破无宫缩、反复胎动减少或既往妊娠宫内胎儿死亡需要监测。随机分组在传统住院治疗(计划纳入 208 例)与远程监护(计划纳入 208 例)之间进行,直至分娩。家庭远程监护由 Sense4Baby CTG 设备、Microlife BP 监护仪、与产科医疗保健专业人员的每日电话联系以及每周医院就诊协助完成。主要结局为不良围产结局的复合指标,定义为围产儿死亡率、5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 或动脉脐带血 pH 值<7.05、母体发病率(子痫、HELLP 综合征、血栓栓塞事件)、新生儿重症监护病房入住率和剖宫产率。使用经过验证的问卷评估患者满意度和护理偏好。我们将进行经济分析。根据意向治疗原则分析结局。

伦理和传播

研究方案已获得乌得勒支大学医学中心伦理委员会和所有六个参与中心委员会的批准。试验结果将提交给同行评议的期刊。

试验注册号

NTR6076。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f03/6830707/67baf72d256a/bmjopen-2019-031700f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验