• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术住院医师术前超声引导下经皮头皮静脉切开术建立完全植入式中心静脉通路装置。

Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagasaki Genbaku Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):2079-2085. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11707.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.11707
PMID:31662541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6899108/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cephalic vein (CV) cut-down for totally implantable central venous access devices (TICVADs) is not frequently used due to its low success rate. We compared the outcomes of CV cut-down using preoperative ultrasonography (US) performed by experienced surgeons versus surgical residents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2015 to December 2017, 10 surgeons implanted 212 TICVADs using CV cut-down with preoperative US. The surgeons were divided into two groups of five each: surgical residents (Group A, n=124 procedures) and experienced surgeons (Group B, n=88 procedures). Duration of operation time, completion rate, and complications were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The completion rate was significantly higher in Group A (98.4% versus 92.0%, p=0.04). Duration of operation time (45.2±14.5 versus 42.0±13.1 minutes, p=0.22), rates of early complications (1.6% versus 1.1%, p=0.77) and late complications (3.2% versus 2.3%, p=0.68) were equivalent between the two groups. No fatal complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

CV cut-down can be safely performed by surgical residents under the use of preoperative US.

摘要

背景/目的:由于头静脉(CV)切开术的成功率较低,因此很少用于完全植入式中心静脉通路装置(TICVAD)。我们比较了由经验丰富的外科医生和外科住院医师术前超声(US)引导下进行 CV 切开术的结果。

患者和方法

2015 年 12 月至 2017 年 12 月,10 名外科医生使用术前 US 引导下的 CV 切开术植入了 212 个 TICVAD。外科医生分为两组,每组 5 名:外科住院医师(A 组,n=124 例)和经验丰富的外科医生(B 组,n=88 例)。回顾性分析手术时间、完成率和并发症。

结果

A 组的完成率明显更高(98.4%比 92.0%,p=0.04)。手术时间(45.2±14.5 比 42.0±13.1 分钟,p=0.22)、早期并发症发生率(1.6%比 1.1%,p=0.77)和晚期并发症发生率(3.2%比 2.3%,p=0.68)在两组之间无差异。两组均无致命性并发症发生。

结论

在术前 US 引导下,外科住院医师可以安全地进行 CV 切开术。

相似文献

1
Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents.手术住院医师术前超声引导下经皮头皮静脉切开术建立完全植入式中心静脉通路装置。
In Vivo. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):2079-2085. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11707.
2
Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.经头静脉切开术评估完全植入式中心静脉通路装置:术前超声检查的应用价值。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;113(1):114-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.24100. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.用于可植入式中心静脉通路的头静脉入路:单机构经验的回顾性研究;队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e18007. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018007.
4
Conversion from cephalic vein to external jugular vein: success rate increased on totally implantable access ports with cut-down method.从头皮静脉转换至颈外静脉:采用切开法的全植入式输液港成功率提高。
Surg Innov. 2013 Dec;20(6):566-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350613479178. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
5
Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.外科住院医师行经皮完全植入式中心静脉置管的安全性。
In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):985-993. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12791.
6
External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.作为一种有用的替代方法,颈外静脉切开入路支持选择头静脉进行完全植入式接入装置的放置。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul;12(7):570-3. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.04.028. Epub 2005 May 5.
7
Percutaneous Cut-Down Technique for Indwelling Port Placement.经皮穿刺切开技术用于留置端口置入
Am Surg. 2017 Dec 1;83(12):1336-1342.
8
Analysis of the Outcomes in Central Venous Access Port Implantation Performed by Residents via the Internal Jugular Vein and Subclavian Vein.住院医师经颈内静脉和锁骨下静脉进行中心静脉通路端口植入术的结果分析
J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein Cephalic Vein Cutdown.经颈外静脉与头静脉切开置入全植入式静脉通路装置的前瞻性对比评估
Am Surg. 2018 Jun 1;84(6):841-843.
10
Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.皮下静脉通路装置植入术中头静脉切开术与锁骨下静脉穿刺技术的前瞻性随机研究
Chir Ital. 2002 Jul-Aug;54(4):495-500.

引用本文的文献

1
Matching intraoperative teaching and learning for medical undergraduates via modified briefing-intraoperative teaching-debriefing (BID) model.通过改良的术前介绍-术中教学-术后总结(BID)模型实现医学生术中教学相长。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 23;13(1):13732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40755-9.
2
Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.外科住院医师行经皮完全植入式中心静脉置管的安全性。
In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):985-993. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12791.
3
Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.首例完全植入式静脉输液港(TIVAD)植入 40 年后:单纯的外科切开技术仅能避免可致命的即刻并发症。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):1739-1749. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02225-6. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
4
Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation.静脉输液港植入标准算法的长期结果
J Pers Med. 2021 Apr 24;11(5):344. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050344.
5
Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture . Cut-down and Residents . Senior Surgeons.穿刺、切开与住院医师-高年资医师行中心静脉置管术的比较
In Vivo. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):1197-1204. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12369.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety Level of Total Central Venous Access Port Implantation Performed by Residents.住院医师施行全中心静脉通路港植入术的安全性。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jan-Feb;76(1):182-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
2
Percutaneous Cut-Down Technique for Indwelling Port Placement.经皮穿刺切开技术用于留置端口置入
Am Surg. 2017 Dec 1;83(12):1336-1342.
3
A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.一种通过颈外静脉植入完全植入式静脉通路装置的新型“耸肩技术”:254例连续病例系列。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;115(3):291-295. doi: 10.1002/jso.24504. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.经头静脉切开术评估完全植入式中心静脉通路装置:术前超声检查的应用价值。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;113(1):114-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.24100. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
A prospective evaluation on external jugular vein cut-down approach for TIVAD implantation.经颈外静脉切开入路置入全植入式静脉输液港的前瞻性评估。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug 12;13:243. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0663-x.
6
Ultrasound-guided vein puncture versus surgical cut-down technique in totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADS): a prospective comparative study on safety, efficacy andcomplications.完全植入式静脉通路装置(TIVAD)中超声引导下静脉穿刺与外科切开技术的比较:一项关于安全性、有效性和并发症的前瞻性对照研究
Int Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;99(4):475-8. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00008.1.
7
Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution.完全植入式静脉通路装置:对单一机构植入的796例装置的不同插入技术及并发症预测因素的回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2014 May 8;14:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-27.
8
International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer.国际临床实践指南:癌症患者中心静脉导管相关血栓形成的治疗和预防。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;11(1):71-80. doi: 10.1111/jth.12071.
9
Right- and left-subclavian vein port-a-cath systems: comparison of complications.右锁骨下静脉和左锁骨下静脉植入式静脉输液港系统:并发症比较
Eur Surg Res. 2012;49(2):66-72. doi: 10.1159/000339308. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
10
Risk factors for upper extremity venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters.与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管相关的上肢静脉血栓形成的危险因素。
J Vasc Access. 2012 Apr-Jun;13(2):231-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000039.