Personeni Nicola, Pressiani Tiziana, Bozzarelli Silvia, Rimassa Lorenza
Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Oct 15;11(10):788-803. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.788.
Over the past ten years, sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has been the standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and well-preserved liver function. Recently, lenvatinib, a different multikinase inhibitor, was shown to be non-inferior to sorafenib, in terms of survival, while all other agents previously tested failed to prove non-inferiority (or superiority) when compared to sorafenib. Similarly, in the second-line setting, most investigational drugs failed to provide better survival outcomes than placebo. However, in the last 2 years three positive phase III trials have been published in this setting. The RESORCE trial, a phase III study evaluating regorafenib in HCC patients who experienced disease progression after first-line treatment with sorafenib, showed better outcomes with regorafenib compared to placebo. More recently, the phase III CELESTIAL trial demonstrated the superiority of cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, MET, and AXL, placebo in the second- and third-line setting in patients progressing on or intolerant to sorafenib. The survival benefits of a sustained anti-angiogenic inhibition were demonstrated also with ramucirumab in the phase III REACH-2 trial in patients previously treated with sorafenib and who had high baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels. Overall, the adverse events reported in these trials were in line with the known safety profiles of the tested agents. After nearly a decade of a certain degree of stagnation, we are now witnessing a period of novel therapeutic advances with multikinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies that will likely change the treatment scenario of HCC.
在过去十年中,多激酶抑制剂索拉非尼一直是无法切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)且肝功能良好患者的标准治疗药物。最近,另一种多激酶抑制剂乐伐替尼在生存期方面被证明不劣于索拉非尼,而此前测试的所有其他药物与索拉非尼相比均未能证明不劣于(或优于)索拉非尼。同样,在二线治疗中,大多数研究药物未能提供比安慰剂更好的生存结果。然而,在过去两年中,在这一治疗领域已发表了三项阳性的III期试验。RESORCE试验是一项III期研究,评估瑞戈非尼用于一线接受索拉非尼治疗后疾病进展的HCC患者,结果显示瑞戈非尼比安慰剂有更好的疗效。最近,III期CELESTIAL试验证明,卡博替尼(一种靶向血管内皮生长因子受体、MET和AXL的多激酶抑制剂)在索拉非尼治疗后进展或不耐受的二线和三线治疗中优于安慰剂。在先前接受索拉非尼治疗且基线甲胎蛋白水平高的患者中进行的III期REACH-2试验中,雷莫西尤单抗也证明了持续抗血管生成抑制的生存获益。总体而言,这些试验中报告的不良事件与受试药物已知的安全性特征一致。在经历了近十年的一定程度的停滞之后,我们现在正见证着一个多激酶抑制剂和单克隆抗体取得新治疗进展的时期,这可能会改变HCC的治疗格局。