• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Use of Direct-Acting Antivirals Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Hepatitis C, 2014-2016.2014-2016 年,医疗保险受益人群中慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用存在种族/民族和社会经济差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1236.
2
Disparities in Initiation of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in an Insured Population.保险人群中丙型肝炎病毒感染直接作用抗病毒药物起始治疗的差异。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):452-460. doi: 10.1177/0033354918772059. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Uptake of New Hepatitis C Drugs in Medicare.医疗保险中新型丙型肝炎药物使用的种族-民族差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1147-1158. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0320-2. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
4
Discontinuation of new hepatitis C drugs among Medicare patients.医疗保险患者中新型丙型肝炎药物的停药。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Feb;26(2):84-88. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42397.
5
Health care utilization and costs associated with direct-acting antivirals for patients with substance use disorders and chronic hepatitis C.与物质使用障碍和慢性丙型肝炎患者直接作用抗病毒药物相关的医疗保健利用和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Oct;27(10):1388-1402. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1388.
6
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Meeting MTM Eligibility Criteria Based on Star Ratings Compared with the Medicare Modernization Act.基于星级评定与《医疗保险现代化法案》相比,在符合 MTM 资格标准方面的种族和民族差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):97-107. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.97.
7
Understanding the Socioeconomic and Geographical Characteristics of Beneficiaries Receiving a Comprehensive Medication Review.了解接受全面药物评估的受益人的社会经济和地理特征。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1276-1281. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1276.
8
Uptake of and Factors Associated With Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy Among Patients in the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study, 2014 to 2015.2014 年至 2015 年慢性丙型肝炎队列研究中直接作用抗病毒治疗的患者接受情况及其相关因素。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;52(7):641-647. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000857.
9
Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Use Remains Low Among Florida Medicaid Beneficiaries With Chronic Hepatitis C.直接作用抗病毒治疗在佛罗里达州医疗补助计划慢性丙型肝炎受益者中的使用率仍然较低。
Hepatol Commun. 2020 Nov 17;5(2):203-216. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1634. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Race/ethnicity and insurance status disparities in access to direct acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus treatment.种族/民族和保险状况差异对丙型肝炎病毒治疗直接作用抗病毒药物的获取的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;113(9):1329-1338. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0033-8. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Sociodemographic Disparities in Hepatitis C Treatment at an Urban Academic Medical Center, 2018-2023.2018 - 2023年城市学术医疗中心丙型肝炎治疗中的种族和社会人口学差异
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 13;12(6):ofaf312. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf312. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Race, Healthcare, and Health Disparities: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Advancing Health Equity.种族、医疗保健和健康差距:批判性评价及推进健康公平的建议。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;24(5):906-918. doi: 10.5811/westjem.58408.
3
Impact of removing prescription co-payments on the use of costly health services: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.取消处方药共付额对昂贵医疗服务使用的影响:一项实用随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 14;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09011-0.
4
Reduction in Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Survival Following Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era.直接作用抗病毒药物时代肝移植治疗肝细胞癌后生存的种族和民族差异减少。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2288-2297.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.11.038. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Current status of disparity in liver disease.肝病差异的现状
World J Hepatol. 2022 Nov 27;14(11):1940-1952. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i11.1940.
6
Disparities in the quality of care for chronic hepatitis C among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群慢性丙型肝炎护理质量的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0263913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263913. eCollection 2022.
7
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, Part 1: National Cancer Statistics.《全国癌症状况年度报告》第 1 部分:国家癌症统计。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1648-1669. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab131.
8
Association of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Project With Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Among US Adults With Hepatitis C.社区医疗保健结果项目扩展与美国丙型肝炎成人直接抗病毒治疗使用率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15523.
9
Delays and Gaps in Progressing Through the Hepatitis C Virus Cascade of Care: An Underserved Safety-net Hospital Experience.丙型肝炎病毒治疗流程中的延误与差距:一家服务欠缺的安全网医院的经历
J Transl Int Med. 2020 Dec 31;8(4):261-267. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2020-0039. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Changing Urban-Rural Disparities in the Utilization of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C in U.S. Medicare Patients, 2014-2017.2014 - 2017年美国医疗保险患者中丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物使用方面城乡差距的变化
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis C in a Well-Insured U.S. Population: Patient Characteristics, Treatment Adherence, Effectiveness, and Health Care Costs, 2013-2015.基于索非布韦的方案治疗美国高保险人群中的慢性丙型肝炎:患者特征、治疗依从性、疗效和医疗保健费用,2013-2015 年。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Feb;25(2):195-210. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.195.
2
Disparities in Initiation of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in an Insured Population.保险人群中丙型肝炎病毒感染直接作用抗病毒药物起始治疗的差异。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):452-460. doi: 10.1177/0033354918772059. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
Innovative technologies and social inequalities in health: A scoping review of the literature.创新技术与健康中的社会不平等:文献综述
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 3;13(4):e0195447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195447. eCollection 2018.
4
Race/ethnicity and insurance status disparities in access to direct acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus treatment.种族/民族和保险状况差异对丙型肝炎病毒治疗直接作用抗病毒药物的获取的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;113(9):1329-1338. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0033-8. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
5
Eight-Week Outcomes of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naive Patients with Hepatitis C: Analysis of Pharmacy-Based Data.非肝硬化初治丙型肝炎患者应用雷迪帕韦/索磷布韦 8 周的结局:基于药房数据的分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jan;24(1):23-28. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.1.23.
6
Uptake of and Factors Associated With Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy Among Patients in the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study, 2014 to 2015.2014 年至 2015 年慢性丙型肝炎队列研究中直接作用抗病毒治疗的患者接受情况及其相关因素。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;52(7):641-647. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000857.
7
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Uptake of New Hepatitis C Drugs in Medicare.医疗保险中新型丙型肝炎药物使用的种族-民族差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1147-1158. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0320-2. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Coverage for hepatitis C drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药计划(Medicare Part D)中丙型肝炎药物的覆盖范围。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(6 Spec No.):SP220-6.
9
Race and Gender Differences in the Use of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus.丙型肝炎病毒直接作用抗病毒药物使用中的种族和性别差异
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 1;63(3):291-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw249. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
10
Prevalence and burden of HCV co-infection in people living with HIV: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.HIV 感染者中 HCV 合并感染的流行率和负担:一项全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;16(7):797-808. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00485-5. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

2014-2016 年,医疗保险受益人群中慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的使用存在种族/民族和社会经济差异。

Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Use of Direct-Acting Antivirals Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Hepatitis C, 2014-2016.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1236-1242. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1236.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1236
PMID:31663464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6823635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New hepatitis C virus (HCV) drugs-direct-acting antivirals (DAAs)-are highly effective but costly, which raises a concern about limited access to DAAs by vulnerable populations. Previous studies of disparities in DAA use across patient groups showed mixed results, but their generalizability was limited due to using data from commercial insurers or from 2014 only-the first year DAAs were available. Disparities in DAA use in a national cohort in the years when more DAAs were available is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether disparities in DAA use by patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status in Medicare changed between 2014 and 2016.

METHODS

The study population was made up of chronic hepatitis C patients in fee-for-service Medicare with Part D between 2014 and 2016. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of using DAAs by patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. We estimated the model separately for 2014 and 2014-2016.

RESULTS

Of 281,810 Medicare patients who were followed to the end of 2016, a total of 90,419 (32.1%) filled prescriptions for DAAs. In the 2014 analysis, blacks were less likely to use DAAs than whites (aOR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.91-0.99). However, in the 2014-2016 analysis, blacks had higher odds of using DAAs than whites (aOR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.22-1.27). No significant Hispanic-white gap existed during the study period. Income was positively associated with DAA use in both periods. Between 2014 and 2016, patients who received a Part D low-income subsidy had lower odds of using DAAs than patients who did not (aOR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.88-0.92), and patients in areas with the higher income tertiles were more likely to initiate DAAs than those in areas with the lowest income tertile.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA use among Medicare patients remained far below the level needed to eradicate HCV. The black-white gap in HCV treatment was closed by 2016, but disparities by patient socioeconomic status remained. DAA use also varied by patient age and health risk, as well as across geographic regions. Continued efforts to improve DAA uptake in all HCV patients are needed to eradicate HCV.

DISCLOSURES

This study was supported by the National Institute on Aging (1 R01 AG055636-01A1) and National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (R24 HD04025). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Feldman owns stock in Gilead Sciences and Abbvie. No other potential competing interest exists.

摘要

背景

新型丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)药物——直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)——具有高效性,但价格昂贵,这引发了人们对弱势群体获得 DAA 的机会有限的担忧。先前对不同患者群体使用 DAA 方面的差异的研究结果喜忧参半,但由于使用了商业保险公司或仅 2014 年的数据(即 DAA 首次可用的那一年),其普遍性受到限制。在更多 DAA 可用的情况下,全国队列中 DAA 使用的差异尚不清楚。

目的

研究 2014 年至 2016 年间医疗保险中患者种族/族裔和社会经济地位的 DAA 使用差异是否发生变化。

方法

研究人群由 2014 年至 2016 年期间有医疗保险和部分 D 部分的慢性丙型肝炎患者组成。我们使用多项逻辑回归来估计患者种族/族裔和社会经济地位使用 DAA 的调整后优势比(aOR)。我们分别为 2014 年和 2014-2016 年估计了模型。

结果

在 2016 年底被跟踪的 281810 名医疗保险患者中,共有 90419 人(32.1%)开了 DAA 处方。在 2014 年的分析中,黑人使用 DAA 的可能性低于白人(aOR=0.95;95%CI=0.91-0.99)。然而,在 2014-2016 年的分析中,黑人使用 DAA 的几率高于白人(aOR=1.24;95%CI=1.22-1.27)。在此期间,西班牙裔人与白人之间没有明显的差距。收入在两个时期都与 DAA 的使用呈正相关。在 2014 年至 2016 年期间,获得部分 D 低收入补贴的患者使用 DAA 的几率低于未获得补贴的患者(aOR=0.90;95%CI=0.88-0.92),收入较高 tertile 地区的患者比收入最低 tertile 地区的患者更有可能开始使用 DAA。

结论

医疗保险患者中 DAA 的使用仍远低于消除 HCV 所需的水平。到 2016 年,HCV 治疗中的黑白差距已经缩小,但患者社会经济地位的差异仍然存在。DAA 的使用还因患者年龄和健康风险以及地理位置而异。需要继续努力提高所有 HCV 患者对 DAA 的接受程度,以消除 HCV。

披露

这项研究得到了美国国家老龄化研究所(1 R01 AG055636-01A1)和美国国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所(R24 HD04025)的支持。资助者在研究的设计和实施、数据的收集、管理、分析和解释、手稿的准备、审查或批准、以及提交手稿出版的决定方面没有任何作用。费尔德曼拥有吉利德科学公司和 Abbvie 的股票。没有其他潜在的竞争利益存在。