Suppr超能文献

术前抗生素预防时机与手术部位感染:TAPAS,一项观察性队列研究。

Timing of Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection: TAPAS, An Observational Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Gynaecology, Tergooi Hospital, Location Blaricum, Blaricum, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e308-e314. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003634.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that surgical site infection (SSI) risk differs, after administration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) within 60-30 or 30-0 minutes before incision.

BACKGROUND

The importance of appropriate timing of SAP before surgery has long been recognized. However, available evidence is contradictive on the best timing within a 60-0 minutes time interval before incision. Here, we aim to evaluate previous contradictions with a carefully designed observational cohort.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted in a Dutch tertiary referral center. For 2 years, consecutive patients with SAP indication undergoing general, orthopedic, or gynecologic surgery were followed for the occurrence of superficial and deep SSI as defined by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention. The association between timing of SAP and SSI was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

After 3001 surgical procedures, 161 SSIs were detected. In 87% of the procedures, SAP was administered within 60 minutes before incision. Only antibiotics with short infusion time were used. Multivariable logistic regression indicated there was no conclusive evidence of a difference in SSI risk after SAP administration 60-30 minutes or 30-0 minutes before incision [odds ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval (0.57-1.19)].

CONCLUSIONS

For SAP with short infusion time no clear superior timing interval within the 60-minute interval before incision could be identified in this cohort. We were unable to reproduce differences in SSI risk found in earlier studies.

摘要

目的

验证在切口前 60-30 分钟或 30-0 分钟内给予手术抗生素预防(SAP)后,手术部位感染(SSI)风险不同的假设。

背景

适当的 SAP 时机在手术前的重要性早已被认识到。然而,现有的证据在切口前 60-0 分钟时间间隔内最佳时机方面存在矛盾。在这里,我们旨在通过精心设计的观察性队列来评估以前的矛盾。

方法

在荷兰的一个三级转诊中心进行了一项观察性队列研究。在 2 年的时间里,对有 SAP 指征的连续接受普通、骨科或妇科手术的患者进行随访,以确定浅层和深层 SSI 的发生情况,这些 SSI 是由疾病控制和预防中心定义的。使用多变量逻辑回归评估 SAP 时机与 SSI 之间的关联。

结果

在 3001 例手术中,检测到 161 例 SSI。在 87%的手术中,SAP 在切口前 60 分钟内给予。仅使用输注时间短的抗生素。多变量逻辑回归表明,在 SAP 给药 60-30 分钟或 30-0 分钟前切口时,SSI 风险没有明显的差异[比值比:0.82;95%置信区间(0.57-1.19)]。

结论

对于输注时间短的 SAP,在该队列中,在切口前 60 分钟的时间间隔内无法确定明确的优势间隔时间。我们无法重现以前研究中发现的 SSI 风险差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验