• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向护理学生和护士讲授掠夺性出版。

Teaching Nursing Students and Nurses About Predatory Publishing.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2019 Nov 1;58(11):627-631. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20191021-03.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20191021-03
PMID:31665526
Abstract

BACKGROUND

All nurses, not just nurse authors, must be aware of the problems and concerns of predatory publishing practices. This is an important topic for nurse educators.

METHOD

Nurse educators must teach nursing students and nurses about the differences between reputable nursing journals and those produced by predatory publishers. Although there are several differences between reputable and predatory nursing journals, the lack of adequate peer review is an important problem. An active teaching strategy is provided that nurse educators may use to facilitate learning about reputable and predatory nursing journals.

RESULTS

Nursing students and nurses will be able to assess a journal for features that suggest the publication is reputable or one that may be produced by a predatory publisher.

CONCLUSION

Nurse educators should teach nursing students and nurses about predatory publishing practices so they can begin to use appropriate discretion when searching for evidence that informs patient care. [J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(11):627-631.].

摘要

背景

所有护士,而不仅仅是护士作者,都必须意识到掠夺性出版行为的问题和关注点。这是护士教育者的一个重要话题。

方法

护士教育者必须教导护理学生和护士,了解信誉良好的护理期刊和掠夺性出版商出版的期刊之间的区别。尽管信誉良好和掠夺性护理期刊之间有几个区别,但缺乏充分的同行评审是一个重要的问题。提供了一种积极的教学策略,护士教育者可以使用该策略来促进对信誉良好和掠夺性护理期刊的学习。

结果

护理学生和护士将能够评估期刊的特征,以确定该出版物是信誉良好的,还是可能由掠夺性出版商出版的。

结论

护士教育者应该教导护理学生和护士有关掠夺性出版行为,以便他们在寻找告知患者护理的证据时,可以开始谨慎使用。[J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(11):627-631.]。

相似文献

1
Teaching Nursing Students and Nurses About Predatory Publishing.向护理学生和护士讲授掠夺性出版。
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Nov 1;58(11):627-631. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20191021-03.
2
Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.区分掠夺性出版与正当出版行为。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):956-960. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.956.
3
Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals.掠夺性开放获取护理期刊研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 Nov;48(6):624-632. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12248. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
4
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication.开放获取蓬勃发展时代的尽职调查:选择声誉良好的期刊进行发表
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Nov 15;364(21). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx206.
6
Characteristics of E-Mail Solicitations From Predatory Nursing Journals and Publishers.掠夺性护理期刊和出版商的电子邮件征稿特征。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2018 Apr 1;49(4):171-177. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20180320-07.
7
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
8
Predatory Journals: A Cautionary Tale and a Lesson in Copyright Transfer.掠夺性期刊:一个警示故事及版权转让方面的教训。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Mar;95(3):441-444. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.001.
9
Predatory Journals: What Nurse Educators Need to Know.掠夺性期刊:护理教育工作者需要了解的内容。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Jan/Feb;36(1):7.
10
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊的问题与挑战。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15039. Epub 2018 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review.掠夺性出版在医学教育中的应用:快速范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05024-x.