J Nurs Educ. 2019 Nov 1;58(11):669-673. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20191021-11.
Various minorities in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status experience poorer health outcomes than those in the majority. Evidence indicates that provider diversity is associated with improved access to care for minorities, increased patient satisfaction, improved outcomes, and better educational experiences for health professions students.
The holistic admissions review is a flexible, individualized way of assessing an applicant's capabilities through consideration of experiences, attributes, and metrics (EAMs) that can serve as an important tool in diversifying the nursing workforce.
This article discusses (a) critical elements that must be addressed during the development and implementation of a holistic admissions review and (b) the creation and use of a scoring rubric based on the EAMs identified.
The implementation of a rubric was found to be a helpful tool to create a more thoughtful review of noncognitive factors and greater diversity in the student body. [J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(11):669-673.].
在种族、民族、性别、性认同和社会经济地位方面，各种少数群体的健康状况不如多数群体。有证据表明，提供者的多样性与少数民族获得更好的医疗服务、提高患者满意度、改善结果以及为卫生专业学生提供更好的教育体验有关。
整体招生审查是一种灵活的、个性化的评估申请人能力的方法，通过考虑可以作为多元化护理劳动力的重要工具的经验、属性和指标 (EAMs)。
本文讨论了（a）在制定和实施整体招生审查过程中必须解决的关键要素，以及（b）根据确定的 EAMs 创建和使用评分表。
实施评分表被发现是一种有用的工具，可以更深入地审查非认知因素，并使学生群体更加多样化。[J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(11):669-673.]。
