School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia.
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):440-447. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
Little emphasis has been given to the standardised measurement of midwifery students' perceptions of their clinical learning experiences.
To develop a tool that evaluates students' perceptions of their clinical learning experiences according to environment and impact of preceptors on professional development.
A cross-sectional design was used. Tool development had three phases: item generation; expert review to assess clarity, apparent internal consistency and content validity; and psychometric testing. All Bachelor of Midwifery students at one university in Australia were invited to complete the online survey. Psychometric testing included dimensionality, internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
A 74% (n=279) response rate was achieved. Factor analysis revealed the Clinical Learning Environment Scale and Impact of the Midwifery Preceptor Scale accounting for 53.6% and 71.5% of variance respectively. Both scales were reliable (Cronbach's alpha=.92 and .94) and valid. Overall, students positively rated the clinical learning environment and preceptors' abilities to foster their sense of identity as a midwife. Students were less satisfied with preceptors' understanding of the academic program.
The new tool consists of two scales that reliably measure midwifery students' perceptions of how the clinical learning environment develops their skills and reflects a midwifery philosophy. Preceptors had a positive influence on students' skills and professional development.
The Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice tool is the first valid and reliable measure of students' perceptions of their clinical learning experiences. Students' feedback provides valuable information to educators and preceptors on how best to optimise clinical learning.
人们对助产士学生对临床学习体验的看法的标准化衡量重视不够。
开发一种工具,根据环境和导师对专业发展的影响来评估学生对临床学习体验的看法。
采用横断面设计。工具开发分为三个阶段:项目生成;专家审查,以评估清晰度、明显的内部一致性和内容有效性;以及心理测量测试。澳大利亚一所大学的所有助产士学士学生都被邀请完成在线调查。心理测量测试包括维度、内部一致性和重测信度。
达到了 74%(n=279)的回复率。因子分析显示,临床学习环境量表和助产士导师影响量表分别占 53.6%和 71.5%的方差。两个量表都是可靠的(Cronbach 的 alpha=.92 和.94)和有效的。总的来说,学生对临床学习环境和导师培养他们作为助产士的身份感的能力给予了积极评价。学生对导师对学术课程的理解不太满意。
新工具由两个量表组成,可靠地衡量助产士学生对临床学习环境如何发展他们的技能的看法,并反映助产士的理念。导师对学生的技能和专业发展有积极的影响。
助产士学生实践评估工具是第一个测量学生对临床学习体验看法的有效且可靠的工具。学生的反馈为教育者和导师提供了有关如何最好地优化临床学习的有价值的信息。