Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
Diplomat Pharmacy, Flint, MI, 48507, USA.
J Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;39(8):814-822. doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00705-5. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
Patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) and antibody deficiency require lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy. While both subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement therapy are effective in preventing infection, patients with PIDD still experience worse health-related quality of life (hrQOL) outcomes.
Assess differences in hrQOL for PIDD patients receiving home SCIG versus IVIG.
SF-36 surveys were administered by a specialty pharmacy to 630 PIDD patients receiving home SCIG and IVIG at baseline and then every 3 months between 2014 and 2016. Results were analyzed using two-sample t tests and linear mixed effects model. Analysis was repeated for different age categories and trended over time.
Patients receiving SCIG reported statistically significant higher energy fatigue scores (+ 9 points, p < 0.001) but lower perceived role limitations due to physical health scores (- 14 points, p < 0.001). These differences were only observed in patients > 36 years of age. There were no differences in the composite SF-36 score for patients receiving SCIG versus IVIG (+ 1, p = 0.66). Immunoglobulin-naïve patients all improved their hrQOL, but a larger improvement was seen in those initiating SCIG versus IVIG.
Patients with PIDD on home IVIG versus SCIG have similar composite hrQOL scores as measured by the SF-36. In the adult population, initiating immunoglobulin replacement with SCIG may result in more hrQOL improvement compared with IVIG, although personal preferences should also be considered.
Patients with PIDD on home IVIG versus SCIG have similar composite health-related quality of life scores as measured by the SF-36. Patients with primary immune-deficiency on home IVIG versus SCIG have similar composite health-related quality of life scores as measured by the SF-36. Personal preferences are important in deciding whether to treat with IVIG or SCIG.
原发性免疫缺陷病(PIDD)和抗体缺陷患者需要终生接受免疫球蛋白替代疗法。虽然皮下免疫球蛋白(SCIG)和静脉免疫球蛋白(IVIG)替代疗法都能有效预防感染,但 PIDD 患者的健康相关生活质量(hrQOL)仍较差。
评估接受家庭 SCIG 与 IVIG 替代治疗的 PIDD 患者的 hrQOL 差异。
在 2014 年至 2016 年期间,一家专业药房通过 SF-36 调查对 630 名接受家庭 SCIG 和 IVIG 治疗的 PIDD 患者进行了基线调查,然后每 3 个月进行一次。采用两样本 t 检验和线性混合效应模型进行结果分析。分析按不同年龄组进行重复,并随时间进行趋势分析。
接受 SCIG 治疗的患者报告称,能量疲劳评分显著升高(+9 分,p<0.001),而身体健康导致的感知角色限制评分则显著降低(-14 分,p<0.001)。这些差异仅在年龄大于 36 岁的患者中观察到。接受 SCIG 与 IVIG 治疗的患者的 SF-36 综合评分无差异(+1,p=0.66)。免疫球蛋白初治患者的 HRQOL 均有所改善,但起始 SCIG 治疗的患者改善幅度更大。
接受家庭 IVIG 与 SCIG 治疗的 PIDD 患者的 SF-36 综合 HRQOL 评分相似。在成年人群中,与 IVIG 相比,起始 SCIG 治疗可能会导致更大的 HRQOL 改善,尽管个人偏好也应考虑在内。
接受家庭 IVIG 与 SCIG 治疗的 PIDD 患者的 SF-36 综合 HRQOL 评分相似。接受家庭 IVIG 与 SCIG 治疗的 PIDD 患者的 SF-36 综合 HRQOL 评分相似。个人偏好在决定采用 IVIG 或 SCIG 治疗时很重要。