RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1183-91. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.716804. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
The purpose was to quantify patient and parent preferences for administration attributes of immunoglobulin (IG) treatments; and determine which administration attributes were most important to users of IG treatment and whether patients and parents have similar preferences for administration attributes.
US adult patients and parents of children with a self-reported physician diagnosis of a primary immunodeficiency disorder completed a best-practice web-enabled choice-format conjoint survey that presented a series of 12 choice questions, each including a pair of hypothetical IG-treatment profiles. After reviewing current therapies, each profile was defined by mode of administration, frequency, location, number of needle sticks, and treatment duration. Before answering the choice questions, respondents were told to assume all treatments worked equally well. Choice questions were based on a D-efficient experimental design. Preference weights for attribute levels were estimated using random-parameters logit for each sample (adult patients and parents). Tests were performed to determine potential interactions among the administration attributes. All respondents provided online informed consent.
In total, 252 patients and 66 parents completed the choice questions appropriately. Overall, both groups preferred a home setting, monthly frequency, fewer needle sticks, and shorter treatment durations of IG treatment relative to alternative choices (p<0.05). Mode of administration was the least important attribute to both samples; however, parents strongly preferred self-administration to an appointment with a healthcare professional (p<0.05), whereas patients slightly preferred self-administration but were indifferent to the two modes.
Respondents evaluate hypothetical treatments and differences can arise between stated and actual choices.
Considering the hypothetical treatments evaluated, IG treatments that provide the option of a home setting, monthly frequency, fewer needle sticks, and shorter treatment durations may address the needs of both patients and parents. Patients and parents have different preferences for administration attributes of IG treatments.
定量患者和家长对免疫球蛋白(IG)治疗给药属性的偏好;并确定哪些给药属性对 IG 治疗使用者最重要,以及患者和家长对给药属性是否有相似的偏好。
美国成年患者和有医生诊断的原发性免疫缺陷疾病的儿童的家长完成了一项最佳实践网络启用选择格式联合调查,该调查提出了一系列 12 个选择题,每个题包括一对假设的 IG 治疗方案。在审查了现有疗法后,每个方案都通过给药方式、频率、地点、针数和治疗持续时间来定义。在回答选择题之前,告知受访者假设所有治疗都同样有效。选择题基于有效实验设计。使用随机参数对数为每个样本(成年患者和家长)估计属性水平的偏好权重。进行了测试以确定给药属性之间的潜在相互作用。所有受访者均在线提供了知情同意。
共有 252 名患者和 66 名家长正确完成了选择题。总体而言,两组都更倾向于在家中、每月一次、少针数和较短的 IG 治疗持续时间,而不是其他选择(p<0.05)。给药方式是两个样本中最不重要的属性;然而,家长强烈偏好自我给药而不是预约医疗保健专业人员(p<0.05),而患者略偏好自我给药,但对两种方式都无所谓。
受访者评估假设的治疗方法,并且陈述的选择和实际选择之间可能存在差异。
考虑到评估的假设治疗方法,提供在家中、每月一次、少针数和较短治疗持续时间的 IG 治疗方法可能满足患者和家长的需求。患者和家长对 IG 治疗的给药属性有不同的偏好。