Huntley Dixie, Giménez Estela, Pascual María Jesús, Hernández-Boluda Juan Carlos, Gago Beatriz, Vázquez Lourdes, Piñana José Luis, García Magdalena, Pérez Ariadna, Serrano David, Hernández Marta, Albert Eliseo, Solano Carlos, Navarro David
Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA ResearchInstitute, Valencia, Spain.
Hematology Service, Hospital Regional Universitario, Málaga, Spain.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;22(1):e13206. doi: 10.1111/tid.13206. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
Conflicting data have been published as to the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and CMV disease in patients undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including 118 patients subjected to unmanipulated haplo-HSCT to further clarify this issue. An historic cohort comprising 165 patients undergoing other transplant modalities (HLA-matched related, matched unrelated or mismatched) was built for comparison purposes. Plasma CMV DNA monitoring was performed using two highly sensitive real-time PCR assays.
Overall, the cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia, recurrent CMV DNAemia, and CMV DNAemia requiring preemptive antiviral therapy in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT was 63.9%, 34.9%, and 50.1%, respectively. These figures were rather comparable for other transplant modalities (P = .22, P = .13 and P = .72, respectively). A trend toward longer duration of episodes and shorter CMV DNA doubling times was observed in haplo-HSCT patients in comparison with other transplant modalities. Furthermore, median CMV DNA peak load was significantly higher in haplo-HSCTs (P = .008), yet overall mortality by day 180 and 365 was the same across comparison groups. There were five cases of CMV disease, and all occurred in haplo-HSCT patients. This latter observation is worrying and merits further investigation.
The incidence of initial and recurrent episodes of CMV DNAemia either requiring or not antiviral therapy in unmanipulated haplo-HSCT was comparable to other transplant modalities in our cohort.
关于接受单倍体相合造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)并使用移植后环磷酰胺治疗的患者发生巨细胞病毒(CMV)血症和CMV疾病的风险,已发表了相互矛盾的数据。
我们进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,纳入了118例接受非处理单倍体相合造血干细胞移植的患者,以进一步阐明这一问题。构建了一个由165例接受其他移植方式(HLA匹配的亲属、匹配的非亲属或不匹配)的患者组成的历史队列用于比较。使用两种高灵敏度实时PCR检测法进行血浆CMV DNA监测。
总体而言,接受单倍体相合造血干细胞移植的患者中,CMV血症、复发性CMV血症以及需要抢先抗病毒治疗的CMV血症的累积发生率分别为63.9%、34.9%和50.1%。其他移植方式的这些数字与之相当(分别为P = 0.22、P = 0.13和P = 0.72)。与其他移植方式相比,单倍体相合造血干细胞移植患者中观察到发作持续时间更长和CMV DNA加倍时间更短的趋势。此外,单倍体相合造血干细胞移植中CMV DNA峰值负荷中位数显著更高(P = 0.008),但各比较组在第180天和第365天的总体死亡率相同。有5例CMV疾病,均发生在单倍体相合造血干细胞移植患者中。后一观察结果令人担忧,值得进一步研究。
在我们的队列中,未处理的单倍体相合造血干细胞移植中,无论是否需要抗病毒治疗,CMV血症初次发作和复发发作的发生率与其他移植方式相当。