Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Hematology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;26(5):972-977. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia occurs frequently in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (allo-HSCT). There is limited information about the incidence, features, and clinical impact of CMV DNAemia blips (episodes defined by an isolated positive PCR result) in this setting. In this retrospective study, 225 consecutive adult patients undergoing any modality of allo-HSCT at our center between May 2012 and July 2019 were included. Plasma CMV DNA load was monitored using a highly sensitive real-time PCR assay. In all, 187 of 225 patients had CMV DNAemia through day 365 after allo-HSCT (total number of episodes, n = 379). Eighty-three of the 187 patients had 1 or more blips (n = 104). Blips occurred as a first episode of CMV DNAemia as opposed to prolonged CMV DNAemia (≥2 consecutive positive PCR results) in 47 patients; in 20 of these patients, blips represented the only documented episode throughout the study period, and in 27 patients, blips preceded a prolonged CMV DNAemia episode. In the remaining 36 patients, blips developed as recurrences. Blips presenting as initial episodes occurred more frequently (P < .001) in patients receiving an allograft from a CMV-seropositive donor. The cumulative incidence of recurrent CMV DNAemia following initial blips, self-resolving prolonged CMV DNAemia episodes, or CMV DNAemia episodes treated preemptively with antivirals was not significantly different (P = .34). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that a CMV DNA load cutoff of 48 IU/mL yielded the highest combined sensitivity (66%) and specificity (70.2%) for predicting a prolonged CMV DNAemia episode. The practical implications of our data in the optimization of preemptive antiviral therapy strategies are discussed.
巨细胞病毒 (CMV) DNA 血症在异基因造血干细胞移植受者 (allo-HSCT) 中经常发生。关于这种情况下 CMV DNA 血症爆发 (通过单次阳性 PCR 结果定义的发作) 的发生率、特征和临床影响的信息有限。在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了 2012 年 5 月至 2019 年 7 月期间在我们中心接受任何方式 allo-HSCT 的 225 例连续成年患者。使用高度敏感的实时 PCR 检测法监测血浆 CMV DNA 载量。总共,在 allo-HSCT 后 365 天内,225 例患者中有 187 例出现 CMV DNA 血症 (总发作次数,n=379)。在 187 例患者中有 83 例发生 1 次或多次爆发 (n=104)。在 47 例患者中,爆发作为 CMV DNA 血症的首发发作,而不是持续性 CMV DNA 血症 (≥2 次连续阳性 PCR 结果);在这些患者中,20 例爆发是整个研究期间唯一有记录的发作,在 27 例患者中,爆发先于持续性 CMV DNA 血症发作。在其余 36 例患者中,爆发作为复发出现。首发发作的爆发更常见 (P<.001) 于接受 CMV 血清阳性供体同种异体移植物的患者。在最初的爆发后,复发性 CMV DNA 血症、自行缓解的持续性 CMV DNA 血症发作或用抗病毒药物预防性治疗的 CMV DNA 血症发作的累积发生率无显著差异 (P=.34)。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,CMV DNA 载量截断值为 48 IU/mL 时,对预测持续性 CMV DNA 血症发作的综合敏感性 (66%) 和特异性 (70.2%) 最高。讨论了我们的数据在优化预防性抗病毒治疗策略中的实际意义。