• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节翻修术中保留髋臼部件的命运:荟萃分析和系统评价。

Fate of the Retained Acetabular Component During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Akbar Niazi Teaching Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1130-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.041. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.041
PMID:31679977
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to estimate re-revision rates due to aseptic loosening of retained acetabular components after revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until June 11, 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent investigators and consensus was reached with the involvement of a third investigator. Rates of re-revision due to aseptic loosening from 6 studies were aggregated using random effects model after a logit transformation and were grouped by study and population level characteristics.

RESULTS

An assessment of the re-revision rates of retained acetabular components due to aseptic loosening in revision total hip arthroplasty was reported in 6 studies involving 669 cases. The pooled re-revision rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval 8.4-18.4) with a mean study follow-up of 8.6 years. The rate of re-revision due to aseptic loosening of retained acetabular components was 6.8% (95% confidence interval 3.4-13.3). In the univariate meta-regression analysis, mean age at index revision surgery was significantly associated with the rate of re-revision due to aseptic loosening (R = 99.98%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Based on this exploratory analysis, revision hip procedures with retentions of well-fixed acetabular components generally have a low risk of failure during mid-term to long-term follow-ups.

摘要

背景

本荟萃分析和系统评价旨在评估初次髋关节翻修术后因非感染性松动而导致保留髋臼部件再次翻修的翻修率。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science,截至 2018 年 6 月 11 日。由 2 位独立研究者提取数据,如有分歧则由第 3 位研究者达成共识。使用随机效应模型对 6 项研究中的数据进行转换后,汇总因非感染性松动而导致的再次翻修率,并按研究和人群水平特征进行分组。

结果

有 6 项研究报告了初次髋关节翻修术后因非感染性松动而保留髋臼部件再次翻修的翻修率,涉及 669 例患者。汇总的再次翻修率为 12.6%(95%置信区间 8.4%-18.4%),平均研究随访时间为 8.6 年。因非感染性松动而导致保留髋臼部件再次翻修的比率为 6.8%(95%置信区间 3.4%-13.3%)。在单变量meta 回归分析中,初次翻修手术时的平均年龄与因非感染性松动导致的再次翻修率显著相关(R=99.98%,P<.0001)。

结论

基于这项探索性分析,在中期至长期随访中,初次髋关节翻修手术保留固定良好的髋臼部件的翻修手术一般失败风险较低。

相似文献

1
Fate of the Retained Acetabular Component During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.髋关节翻修术中保留髋臼部件的命运:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1130-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.041. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.网眼金属与非网眼金属髋臼部件在翻修全髋关节置换术后再次翻修风险方面的比较:来自英国国家关节注册处的一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 5;100(13):1132-1140. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00718.
3
Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements.初次全髋关节置换术中高多孔髋臼组件无菌性松动的翻修:20993 例全髋关节置换术的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):312-315. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
The impact of retaining the femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.保留股骨柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中的影响:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):947-966. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05087-3. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Deep Profile Jumbo Component: A Ten to Sixteen Year Follow-Up Study.髋臼翻修采用非骨水泥型大直径假体:一项十至十六年随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):496-499. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.髋臼骨折手术治疗后的全髋关节置换术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Sep;80(9):1295-305. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199809000-00008.
7
Acetabular revision with bone grafting and cementation for aseptic loosening after primary Charnley low-friction hip arthroplasty with structural bulk autografts.采用结构性大块自体骨移植,对初次Charnley低摩擦髋关节置换术后无菌性松动进行髋臼翻修并植骨及骨水泥固定。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016 Dec;24(3):328-331. doi: 10.1177/1602400311.
8
Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components.非骨水泥型整体髋臼组件的早期无菌性松动
Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):715-722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3254-8. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
The diagnostic performance of radiographic criteria to detect aseptic acetabular component loosening after revision total hip arthroplasty.放射学标准在翻修全髋关节置换术后检测无菌性髋臼假体松动方面的诊断性能。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):458-464. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0804.R1.
10
Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.用于翻修全髋关节置换术的超大号非骨水泥型半球形髋臼组件。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Sep;83(9):1352-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Retention of the Acetabular Component at Revision Surgery a Long-Term Solution?髋臼组件在翻修手术中的保留是一种长期解决方案吗?
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Aug 26;23:101197. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101197. eCollection 2023 Oct.