• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非骨水泥型整体髋臼组件的早期无菌性松动

Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components.

作者信息

Miettinen Simo S A, Mäkinen Tatu J, Laaksonen Inari, Mäkelä Keijo, Huhtala Heini, Kettunen Jukka, Remes Ville

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Sairaalakatu 1, 01400, Vantaa, Finland.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):715-722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3254-8. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-016-3254-8
PMID:27506571
Abstract

PURPOSE

Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for early aseptic loosening of the cementless monoblock acetabular components.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis consisted of 4,043 cementless hip devices (3,209 THAs and 834 HRAs). We identified 41 patients with early aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. A control group of 123 patients without acetabular component loosening was randomly selected. The demographic data and risk factors for loosening of the acetabular component were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 4.6 years (range, 1.7-7.8). The end-point was acetabular revision.

RESULTS

The incidence of early acetabular component loosening was 1.0 %. Mean time to revision was 1.2 years (SD 1.6, range 0.0-5.4). There was significantly more Dorr type A and C acetabular morphology in patients with early loosening (P = 0.014). The loosened components were implanted to more vertical (P < 0.001) and less anteverted (P = 0.001) position than those of the control group. Presence of acetabular dysplasia or acetabular component type did not associate to early loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetabular morphology (Dorr type A and C) and component positioning vertically and less anteverted were more common in patients with early aseptic loosening of cementless acetabular components. Suboptimal cup position most likely reflects challenges to obtain sufficient stability during surgery. We hypothesize that errors in surgical technique are the main reason for early loosening of monoblock acetabular components.

摘要

目的

非骨水泥型整体髋臼组件的早期无菌性松动是全髋关节置换术(THA)和髋关节表面置换术(HRA)的一种罕见并发症。本研究的目的是评估非骨水泥型整体髋臼组件早期无菌性松动的发生率及危险因素。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入了4043例非骨水泥型髋关节假体(3209例THA和834例HRA)。我们确定了41例髋臼组件早期无菌性松动的患者。随机选取123例无髋臼组件松动的患者作为对照组。评估髋臼组件松动的人口统计学数据和危险因素。平均随访时间为4.6年(范围1.7 - 7.8年)。终点为髋臼翻修术。

结果

髋臼组件早期松动的发生率为1.0%。翻修的平均时间为1.2年(标准差1.6,范围0.0 - 5.4年)。早期松动患者中Dorr A型和C型髋臼形态明显更多(P = 0.014)。与对照组相比,松动组件植入的位置更垂直(P < 0.001)且前倾角更小(P = 0.001)。髋臼发育不良或髋臼组件类型与早期松动无关。

结论

髋臼形态(Dorr A型和C型)以及组件垂直且前倾角较小的位置在非骨水泥髋臼组件早期无菌性松动患者中更为常见。髋臼杯位置欠佳很可能反映了手术过程中获得足够稳定性的挑战。我们推测手术技术失误是整体髋臼组件早期松动的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components.非骨水泥型整体髋臼组件的早期无菌性松动
Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):715-722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3254-8. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
2
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].[采用非骨水泥髋臼杯及打压植骨异体碎骨块进行全髋关节置换术中无菌性松动的髋臼翻修术]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
3
Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.巨型髋臼组件在髋关节翻修术中的固定、存活和脱位。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20;95(6):543-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00758.
4
Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?在中期随访的翻修全髋关节置换术中,模块化双动髋臼组件是否存在问题?
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2015.R1.
5
[Mid-term results of cementless ultima cups in primary total hip replacement].[初次全髋关节置换术中非骨水泥Ultima髋臼杯的中期结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Jun;75(3):205-11.
6
Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.初次全髋关节置换术中用于脱位高危患者的双动髋臼杯
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:251-258.
7
Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中非骨水泥髋臼固定的影像学与临床分析
Chin J Traumatol. 2005 Oct;8(5):263-8.
8
Proximal translation of > 1 mm within the first two years of revision total hip arthroplasty correctly predicts whether or not an acetabular component is loose in 80% of cases: a case-control study with confirmed intra-operative outcomes.翻修全髋关节置换术后头两年内髋臼假体近端移位超过1毫米,在80%的病例中可准确预测髋臼假体是否松动:一项术中结果得到确认的病例对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):465-474. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0805.R1.
9
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.经全国英格兰和威尔士关节注册中心的倾向评分匹配研究发现,使用小梁金属髋臼组件可降低初次全髋关节置换术后翻修的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.036. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.采用扁平压配髋臼组件的初次全髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎和炎性关节炎:416例髋关节的前瞻性研究,随访6至10年。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Dec;128(12):1379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0731-6. Epub 2008 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival outcomes of hybrid total hip replacement following failed proximal femoral nail antirotation: a retrospective study with a median 10-year follow-up.股骨近端防旋髓内钉失败后行杂交全髋关节置换术的生存结果:一项中位随访10年的回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 May 13;12:1562738. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1562738. eCollection 2025.
2
Morphological features of the acetabulum with coxa profunda in women: a retrospective observational study.女性髋臼深型股骨髋臼撞击症的形态学特征:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 31;25(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07540-9.
3
Total hip arthroplasty with monobloc press-fit acetabular components and large-diameter bearings for atypical acetabula is safe: a consecutive case series of 125 hips with mean follow-up of 9 years.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term results with the Atlas IIIp elastic cementless acetabular component in total hip replacement.全髋关节置换术中使用阿特拉斯IIIp型弹性非骨水泥髋臼组件的长期效果。
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3088-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
2
Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?全髋关节置换术后髋臼杯在二维或三维模型上的方向是否准确?
Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10):2009-15. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2336-8. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
3
Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations.
采用一体式压配髋臼组件和大直径轴承进行非典型髋臼全髋关节置换术是安全的:一项连续病例系列研究,共 125 例髋关节,平均随访 9 年。
Can J Surg. 2024 Feb 6;67(1):E40-E48. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014022. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
4
Primary total hip arthroplasty failure: aseptic loosening remains the most common cause of revision.初次全髋关节置换术失败:无菌性松动仍是翻修的最常见原因。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):7080-7089. eCollection 2022.
5
Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve in preoperative planning of the acetabular cup size in primary total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节初次置换术髋臼杯型号术前规划学习曲线的量化和个体化评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Sep;141(9):1601-1608. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03848-6. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital prosthesis-related complications following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study.全髋关节置换术后院内假体相关并发症的发生率及危险因素:一项基于全国住院患者样本数据库的回顾性研究
Int Orthop. 2020 Nov;44(11):2243-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04682-y. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
7
Laser Resonance Frequency Analysis: A Novel Measurement Approach to Evaluate Acetabular Cup Stability During Surgery.激光共振频率分析:一种评估手术中髋臼杯稳定性的新测量方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 8;19(22):4876. doi: 10.3390/s19224876.
8
Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.定制组件治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ B 型髋臼缺损:早期结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):117-122. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4203-5. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Pelvic pitch and roll during total hip arthroplasty performed through a posterolateral approach. A potential source of error in free-hand cup positioning.全髋关节置换术经后外侧入路时骨盆的倾斜和旋转。徒手杯定位的潜在误差源。
Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1823-1829. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4141-2. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning.关于髋臼原生角度改变与垂直种植体位置不当之间关系的回顾性研究。
Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):769-775. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3584-1. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
水泥固定和非水泥固定全髋关节置换的失败率:四个国家联合北欧数据库的注册研究。
BMJ. 2014 Jan 13;348:f7592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7592.
4
Press-fit cementless acetabular fixation with and without screws.压配式非骨水泥髋臼固定,带或不带螺钉。
Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2075-2. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
5
Early migration characteristics of a 180° porous-coated cup with 1-mm press fit.1 毫米压配 180°多孔涂层杯的早期迁移特征。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 May;133(5):707-12. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1713-x. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
6
Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure.金属对金属全髋关节置换术:早期失败的原因及高发生率
Orthopedics. 2012 Jul 1;35(7):e1009-16. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120621-12.
7
Cup press fit in uncemented THA depends on sex, acetabular shape, and surgical technique.在非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中,臼杯压配取决于性别、髋臼形态和手术技术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3014-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2381-9.
8
Hip resurfacing in patients under thirty years old: an attractive option for young and active patients.髋关节表面置换术在 30 岁以下患者中的应用:一种针对年轻、活跃患者极具吸引力的选择。
Int Orthop. 2012 Sep;36(9):1789-94. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1555-0. Epub 2012 May 11.
9
Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.髋关节置换术中 socket 固定方法是否存在更优方法的证据?系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1109-18. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1234-6. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
10
The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.髋关节表面置换与全髋关节置换的临床和影像学结果:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):684-95. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.533933. Epub 2010 Nov 11.