• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rapid detection of biofilm by wound blotting following sharp debridement of chronic pressure ulcers predicts wound healing: A preliminary study.锐性清创后伤口拭子快速检测慢性压力性溃疡生物膜与创面愈合的相关性:一项初步研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):191-196. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13256. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
2
Effectiveness of biofilm-based wound care system on wound healing in chronic wounds.基于生物膜的伤口护理系统对慢性伤口愈合的效果。
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Sep;27(5):540-547. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12738. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Concurrent validity of biofilm detection by wound blotting on hard-to-heal wounds.难愈性伤口拭子法检测生物膜的同时效度。
J Wound Care. 2021 Apr 1;30(Sup4):S4-S13. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup4.S4.
4
Biofilm detection by wound blotting can predict slough development in pressure ulcers: A prospective observational study.通过伤口印迹法检测生物膜可预测压疮中的腐肉形成:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):131-138. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12505. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
5
Clinical experience with surgical debridement and simultaneous meshed skin grafts in treating biofilm-associated infection: an exploratory retrospective pilot study.手术清创联合网状皮肤移植治疗生物膜相关感染的临床经验:一项探索性回顾性试点研究。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020 Feb;54(1):47-54. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1673170. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Biofilm management using monofilament fibre debridement technology: outcomes and clinician and patient satisfaction.使用单丝纤维清创技术进行生物膜管理:结果以及临床医生和患者的满意度。
J Wound Care. 2019 Sep 2;28(9):608-622. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.9.608.
7
Clinical Assessment of a Biofilm-disrupting Agent for the Management of Chronic Wounds Compared With Standard of Care: A Therapeutic Approach.与标准护理相比,用于慢性伤口管理的生物膜破坏剂的临床评估:一种治疗方法。
Wounds. 2018 May;30(5):120-130. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
8
Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window.生物膜成熟度研究表明,锐利清创术开启了一个时间依赖性的治疗窗口。
J Wound Care. 2010 Aug;19(8):320-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.8.77709.
9
Recommendations for the management of biofilm: a consensus document.生物膜管理建议:一份共识文件。
J Wound Care. 2016 Jun;25(6):305-17. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.6.305.
10
Anti-biofilm strategies and the need for innovations in wound care.抗生物膜策略与伤口护理创新的必要性。
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2010 Jan;5(1):10-7. doi: 10.2174/157489110790112581.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review to Identify Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Biomarkers Reported in the Literature to Be Indicative of Biofilm in Chronic Wounds.一项范围综述,旨在确定文献中报道的可指示慢性伤口生物膜的临床体征、症状和生物标志物。
Int Wound J. 2025 May;22(5):e70181. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70181.
2
How Nanoparticles Help in Combating Chronic Wound Biofilms Infection?纳米颗粒如何帮助对抗慢性伤口生物膜感染?
Int J Nanomedicine. 2024 Nov 15;19:11883-11921. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S484473. eCollection 2024.
3
Association of biofilm and microbial metrics with healing rate in older adults with chronic venous leg ulcers.生物膜和微生物指标与老年慢性静脉性腿部溃疡愈合率的关系。
Wound Repair Regen. 2024 Nov-Dec;32(6):858-871. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13230. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
4
Assessing Biofilm at the Bedside: Exploring Reliable Accessible Biofilm Detection Methods.床边生物膜评估:探索可靠易用的生物膜检测方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 24;14(19):2116. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192116.
5
The role of the skin microbiome in wound healing.皮肤微生物群在伤口愈合中的作用。
Burns Trauma. 2024 Mar 4;12:tkad059. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad059. eCollection 2024.
6
Emerging Issues and Initial Insights into Bacterial Biofilms: From Orthopedic Infection to Metabolomics.细菌生物膜的新问题与初步见解:从骨科感染到代谢组学
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Feb 13;13(2):184. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020184.
7
Selective Optical Imaging for Detection of Bacterial Biofilms in Tissues.用于检测组织中细菌生物膜的选择性光学成像
J Imaging. 2023 Aug 15;9(8):160. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9080160.
8
Novel Diagnostic Technologies and Therapeutic Approaches Targeting Chronic Wound Biofilms and Microbiota.针对慢性伤口生物膜和微生物群的新型诊断技术与治疗方法
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022 Jun;11(2):60-72. doi: 10.1007/s13671-022-00354-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
9
Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis.采样皮肤表面化学物质用于诊断和预后。
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jul;30(4):509-525. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13030. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
10
Point-of-Care Wound Blotting with Alcian Blue Grading versus Fluorescence Imaging for Biofilm Detection and Predicting 90-Day Healing Outcomes.用于生物膜检测和预测90天愈合结果的阿尔新蓝分级即时伤口印迹法与荧光成像法的比较
Biomedicines. 2022 May 22;10(5):1200. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051200.

本文引用的文献

1
Shotgun sequencing of clinical biofilm following scanning electron microscopy identifies bacterial community composition.扫描电子显微镜检查后对临床生物膜进行鸟枪法测序可鉴定细菌群落组成。
Pathog Dis. 2019 Feb 1;77(1). doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftz013.
2
Biofilms in Chronic Wounds: Pathogenesis and Diagnosis.慢性伤口中的生物膜:发病机制与诊断。
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 May;37(5):505-517. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
3
Biofilm-based wound care: the importance of debridement in biofilm treatment strategies.基于生物膜的伤口护理:清创术在生物膜治疗策略中的重要性。
Br J Community Nurs. 2017 Jun 2;22(Sup6):S20-S25. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.Sup6.S20.
4
The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data.慢性伤口中生物膜的患病率:已发表数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):20-25. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20.
5
Biofilm detection by wound blotting can predict slough development in pressure ulcers: A prospective observational study.通过伤口印迹法检测生物膜可预测压疮中的腐肉形成:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):131-138. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12505. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Prediction of healing progress of pressure ulcers by distribution analysis of protein markers on necrotic tissue: A retrospective cohort study.
Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Sep;23(5):772-7. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12316. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
The visualization of biofilms in chronic diabetic foot wounds using routine diagnostic microscopy methods.使用常规诊断显微镜方法对慢性糖尿病足伤口中的生物膜进行可视化观察。
J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014:153586. doi: 10.1155/2014/153586. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
8
Exploring the prevalence of skin tears and skin properties related to skin tears in elderly patients at a long-term medical facility in Japan.在日本一家长期医疗机构中,探究老年患者皮肤撕裂的发生率以及与皮肤撕裂相关的皮肤特性。
Int Wound J. 2016 Apr;13(2):189-97. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12251. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
9
Frequency of debridements and time to heal: a retrospective cohort study of 312 744 wounds.清创频率和愈合时间:312744 例伤口的回顾性队列研究。
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Sep;149(9):1050-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4960.
10
Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?(*).扩展 TIME 概念:在过去 10 年中我们学到了什么?(*)
Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01097.x.

锐性清创后伤口拭子快速检测慢性压力性溃疡生物膜与创面愈合的相关性:一项初步研究。

Rapid detection of biofilm by wound blotting following sharp debridement of chronic pressure ulcers predicts wound healing: A preliminary study.

机构信息

Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Care Innovation, Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):191-196. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13256. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.13256
PMID:31680469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7948602/
Abstract

For optimal wound bed preparation, wound debridement is essential to eliminate bacterial biofilms. However, it is challenging for clinicians to determine whether the biofilm is completely removed. A newly developed biofilm detection method based on wound blotting technology may be useful. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of biofilm elimination on wound area decrease in pressure ulcers, as confirmed using the wound blotting method. In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled patients with pressure ulcers who underwent sharp debridement with pre- and post-debridement wound blotting. Biofilm was detected on the nitrocellulose membrane using ruthenium red or alcian blue staining. Patients were included if the test was positive for biofilm before wound debridement. Percent decrease in wound area after 1 week was calculated as an outcome measure. We classified the wounds into a biofilm-eliminated group and a biofilm-remaining group based on the post-debridement wound blotting result. Sixteen wound blotting samples from nine pressure ulcers were collected. The percent decrease in wound area was significantly higher in the biofilm-eliminated group (median: 14.4%, interquartile range: 4.6%-20.1%) than in the biofilm-remaining group (median: -14.5%, interquartile range: -25.3%-9.6%; P = .040). The presence of remaining biofilms was an independent predictor for reduced percent decrease in wound area (coefficient = -22.84, P = .040). Biofilm-based wound care guided by wound blotting is a promising measure to help clinicians eliminate bacterial bioburden more effectively for wound area reduction.

摘要

为了达到最佳的伤口床准备,清除细菌生物膜对于伤口清创至关重要。然而,临床医生很难确定生物膜是否已完全清除。一种新开发的基于伤口擦拭技术的生物膜检测方法可能会有所帮助。因此,我们旨在研究使用伤口擦拭法确认的生物膜消除对压疮伤口面积减少的影响。在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们招募了接受锐性清创术且在清创前后进行伤口擦拭的压疮患者。使用钌红或阿利新蓝染色在硝酸纤维素膜上检测生物膜。如果在伤口清创前生物膜检测为阳性,则纳入患者。将 1 周后伤口面积减少的百分比作为观察指标。我们根据清创后的伤口擦拭结果将伤口分为生物膜消除组和生物膜残留组。从 9 个压疮中收集了 16 个伤口擦拭样本。生物膜消除组(中位数:14.4%,四分位距:4.6%-20.1%)的伤口面积减少百分比明显高于生物膜残留组(中位数:-14.5%,四分位距:-25.3%-9.6%;P =.040)。生物膜残留的存在是伤口面积减少百分比降低的独立预测因子(系数=-22.84,P =.040)。基于生物膜的伤口护理,由伤口擦拭指导,有望帮助临床医生更有效地消除细菌生物负荷,以减少伤口面积。